She sent her husband out on a fool's errand-an errand that she had earlier timed by looking it up on her phone.
She then led her her three children down into the basement.
Were they frightened at this stage or had she told them they were going to play a game or look for something?
She took the first child, while the other two looked on and strangled the child with an exercise band.
The child must have been terrified, begging and she carried on while the cries of the two children who were waiting their turn to be murdered, cried and screamed .
When she had finished and knew the child was dead, she moved on to the second child and, with an exercise band, strangled the child.
She then took the terrified third child and strangled them with an exercise band.
All this shit about about whether she was evil or mad. She may have been both.
It doesn't matter a shit and, if it is found to matter a shit, then a lot more women and children will die at the hands of men who offer up the same defence.
I find it interesting that she is in court trying to defend herself.
I, and I imagine many many mothers who, if they had done this evil act, would have no interest in defending themselves; would just want to either die or wouldn't care about the rest of their life.
She does.
She is a cunt. An evil cunt. She may be a mad, evil cunt but cunt is what she is and I wouldn't give a toss if her arse was introduced to the electric chair and, if she is repentant, nor should she!