Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

What is this ‘You might also like’ clutter?

790 replies

PalatineHill · 15/11/2022 14:07

Hi MNHQ. Please just take it out. Or let me opt out of it? It looks a mess.

If here’s something that I might also like to read, I’ll find it by using the search function.
These suggestions are just encouraging the posting of the same points on multiple similar threads, and that will discourage healthy normal thread death.

It’s really distracting to look at visually, I really liked the uncluttered ‘clean’ MN format compared to other forums.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
BoreOfWhabylon · 22/11/2022 00:17

Hear hear @ShirleyPhallus ! Appalling way to address anyone.
And I hate the new feature.

BruceAndNosh · 21/11/2022 21:25

@JustineMumsnet We'll will also introduce two new setting in Customise
One to turn off seeing Similar Threads at all and one which ensures you only see threads in Active that have been started within the last 30 days. We're aiming to release both of these changes in the next week or so. Thanks for your input and for your patience.

Is that before or after the Edit Function which you said was under development and on its way last year...?

ThatshallotBaby · 21/11/2022 21:08

I find the suggestions quite funny tbh.
Peps things up a bit.

ShirleyPhallus · 21/11/2022 20:40

HereComeTheGrannies · 21/11/2022 20:34

A flounce? 😂😂 how did you ever get MN as big as it is with this attitude?

Genuine question to any other @mnhq person watching this thread since Justine has spat her dummy out and ran away, why are these new features pushed when they’re CLEARLY not functional? It took fucking ages for the new and shiny website to work properly. Now creating an algorithm that gets it right every time is tricky is certainly true, but it appears that it’s not getting it right at all. Why are you refusing to answer what UX dev/testing has been done? You refused to answer this when you rolled the website out too… is it because the answer is fuck all?

Where do people get off speaking like this. No one owes you any answers. If I was a mod I certainly wouldn’t respond to rude, demanding posts like this fgs.

daisychain01 · 21/11/2022 20:39

@HereComeTheGrannies OMG, cringe!

HereComeTheGrannies · 21/11/2022 20:36

oh and the whole “algorithm” thing taking context into the equation? Yeah, you might need to work on that as there is no way the circled thread should be recommended when viewing a thread about racism …

What is this ‘You might also like’ clutter?
HereComeTheGrannies · 21/11/2022 20:34

JustineMumsnet · 21/11/2022 19:21

Ok that wasn't meant to be sarcastic - it was meant to be factual. So I'm going to leave the thread now as it's clear that I'm not helping. We'll make the improvements as promised and check in after that.

A flounce? 😂😂 how did you ever get MN as big as it is with this attitude?

Genuine question to any other @mnhq person watching this thread since Justine has spat her dummy out and ran away, why are these new features pushed when they’re CLEARLY not functional? It took fucking ages for the new and shiny website to work properly. Now creating an algorithm that gets it right every time is tricky is certainly true, but it appears that it’s not getting it right at all. Why are you refusing to answer what UX dev/testing has been done? You refused to answer this when you rolled the website out too… is it because the answer is fuck all?

saraclara · 21/11/2022 20:33

Thanks for moving it below the reply box at least, MMHQ. Less scrolling and fewer accidental clicks is a start.

JaneJeffer · 21/11/2022 20:17

@ArcaneWireless stop it 🤣

Travis1 · 21/11/2022 20:16

00100001 · 21/11/2022 19:45

It will be because they've spent a significant amount of money on it. It's not going anywhere.

If they have they should be asking for a refund PDQ!

ArcaneWireless · 21/11/2022 20:12

I think I have the solution. I’ve asked how to make this better in Chat and checked what came up in the popular and helpful suggested threads

Take your pick…

Boiling a ham for 3 days in cola.

Inflating a burst tyre with a straw.

Using chuddy to hang a mirror.

A pea - the new MN chicken?

1993 - only 6 more years til I can dance like it is 1999 - can’t wait.

Problem solved. Probably….

00100001 · 21/11/2022 20:10

BusgyMalone · 21/11/2022 20:05

I don’t think they have spent a significant amount of money on it… but it’s an easy way to bump up numbers when telling sponsors of what a successful site it is in terms of page views and reach

Even the crappy implementation will have cost them a good amount to either develop in-house or purchase.

Either way they're not going to chuck it.

BusgyMalone · 21/11/2022 20:05

00100001 · 21/11/2022 19:45

It will be because they've spent a significant amount of money on it. It's not going anywhere.

I don’t think they have spent a significant amount of money on it… but it’s an easy way to bump up numbers when telling sponsors of what a successful site it is in terms of page views and reach

CorporateBull · 21/11/2022 20:04

Never got an answer on what UX has been done. I do find it interesting how many companies don’t do it and then find they’ve introduced something that, um, just doesn’t work for users.

00100001 · 21/11/2022 19:45

Whinge · 21/11/2022 19:33

Ok that wasn't meant to be sarcastic - it was meant to be factual.

It's difficult to conveny tone in posts, but it definitely read as a sarcastic reply to me, and i'm sure others.

So I'm going to leave the thread now as it's clear that I'm not helping. We'll make the improvements as promised and check in after that.

@JustineMumsnet You still haven't answered why you think the feature should stay. There are a lot of unhappy posters (for good reason), and it's clear the majority of users dislike the new feature.

You have the benefit on a ready made focus group giving you their feedback. Why not discuss why you think it's worth keeping the new feature, with significant tweaks and modifications, rather than the obvious solution of just getting rid of it?

It will be because they've spent a significant amount of money on it. It's not going anywhere.

kindlyensure · 21/11/2022 19:43

Ouch. That was pretty brutal. Now I'm grabbing the popcorn.

Whinge · 21/11/2022 19:33

Ok that wasn't meant to be sarcastic - it was meant to be factual.

It's difficult to conveny tone in posts, but it definitely read as a sarcastic reply to me, and i'm sure others.

So I'm going to leave the thread now as it's clear that I'm not helping. We'll make the improvements as promised and check in after that.

@JustineMumsnet You still haven't answered why you think the feature should stay. There are a lot of unhappy posters (for good reason), and it's clear the majority of users dislike the new feature.

You have the benefit on a ready made focus group giving you their feedback. Why not discuss why you think it's worth keeping the new feature, with significant tweaks and modifications, rather than the obvious solution of just getting rid of it?

Beees · 21/11/2022 19:27

Ok that wasn't meant to be sarcastic - it was meant to be factual.

Youre kidding right? If that's not sarcasm then I'd love to see you're sarcastic response!

JaneJeffer · 21/11/2022 19:25

Ok that wasn't meant to be sarcastic
Neither is this: yeah right

Hoppinggreen · 21/11/2022 19:24

92% want it to go!!!

JustineMumsnet · 21/11/2022 19:21

Beees · 21/11/2022 18:16

Well - there are around 150 people on this thread, so given that 33k users have clicked on it, I'd say not many!

Sarcastic replies like this just make you look childish to be honest and don't address some of the very reasonable issues with the new feature discussed on this thread.

Ok that wasn't meant to be sarcastic - it was meant to be factual. So I'm going to leave the thread now as it's clear that I'm not helping. We'll make the improvements as promised and check in after that.

JaneJeffer · 21/11/2022 19:12

164 people have voted so far 91% of whom don't want it.

Travis1 · 21/11/2022 19:08

JustineMumsnet · 21/11/2022 18:12

Well - there are around 150 people on this thread, so given that 33k users have clicked on it, I'd say not many!

Wow. Lovely bit of customer relations there

00100001 · 21/11/2022 18:54

Whinge · 21/11/2022 18:49

Something tells me it's going to be a heck of a lot less than the 33k users / 78k clicks since it was introduced.

Perhaps @JustineMumsnet will decide it's not worth keeping a feature no one uses when she can't use the dodgy figures to defend it? 🤷🏻‍♀️

I think they're probably just hoping we'll stop moaning and forget about it.

Whinge · 21/11/2022 18:49

00100001 · 21/11/2022 18:36

Will be interesting to see how engagement changes over the next few days.

Something tells me it's going to be a heck of a lot less than the 33k users / 78k clicks since it was introduced.

Perhaps @JustineMumsnet will decide it's not worth keeping a feature no one uses when she can't use the dodgy figures to defend it? 🤷🏻‍♀️

Swipe left for the next trending thread