Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To say my DS cant keep missing school because the school “cant cope”??

660 replies

Jacobator · 11/09/2026 13:19

Sorry this is long and probably doesnt make much sense but i am so fed up and dont really know if im being unreasonable anymore.

I have 2 boys, 12 and 9, both have additional needs although they are very different. DS2 has always been harder in school but usually he manages and we have never had anything like this before. Since going back this September he has apparently been having what they call explosive behaviour and he has now been sent home several times. One day they rang me before lunch and said i needed to collect him because he wasnt able to calm down and they didnt have the staff to keep him safe.

I did collect him because what else can i do, but then its happening again and again. Yesterday they rang and said basically they cant meet his needs at the moment. I said well what does that actually mean because he is supposed to be in school and not sitting at home with me because you dont have enough staff.

They keep saying they are not excluding him and that its a “temporary arrangement” while they look at what support he needs. Sorry but if my child is being told to stay at home because school cant cope with him, what exactly do they think an exclusion is??

I have asked about his support plan and whether they have actually done everything that is in it and i get lots of meetings and people saying they are concerned but nobody seems to actually have an answer. I dont want to keep having arguments with the school because obviously DS has to go there and i dont want things getting worse for him, but i also cant just accept him being kept home every time he has a meltdown.

DH thinks im making this harder than it needs to be and says we should look at specialist provision. I know he might be right but i dont want DS2 being put somewhere just because his current school doesnt want the bother. His brother is at the same school and they are very close, and DS2 already feels different enough without being taken away and told he needs a special school.

And before anyone says we should just pay for extra help, we actually do. Between therapy, assessments, things for school, transport and other bits we are spending over £2,000 a month at the moment. Yes i know thats a lot. We arent sitting on a pile of money, it is coming out of our savings and some of the things are because we have been told to get them privately because waiting lists are ridiculous. Im not saying that means the school owes us anything, just that its frustrating to constantly be told to get more support when we are already trying everything we can.

I am not pretending DS is easy. He can be very difficult when he is overwhelmed and i know the other children need to be safe too. But surely the answer cant just be send him home until he behaves normally? He cant learn how to manage school if he isnt actually allowed to be at school.

DH says im refusing to accept that he needs specialist help and maybe i am. I just feel like once we go down that road thats it, he gets labelled and everyone gives up trying to make mainstream work.

So AIBU to be pushing back on this and saying they cant keep sending him home because they “cant cope”? Or am i the one refusing to accept reality here?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Heronwatcher · 11/09/2026 16:23

EarthaKittsVoice · 11/09/2026 16:14

You are going through what a lot of parents across England are going through. It is on the school to accomodate your child as it is their legal requirement. If they cannot they must then find an appropiate option.

A child can't be off from school because the school is unable to do their job. Please research for other cases similar to yours as there are many. Contact your council and MP as the school is failing your child at this point

Sorry but this is over simplifying it. It sounds as though the school was meeting need, but that the child list isn’t coping this year for some reason. The school may well be trying their best, but if a child doesn’t have a 1-1 and is exhibiting dangerous behaviour like throwing chairs what is the school meant to do? Yes if there is a staff member who can help, great, but what if it’s not working?

My daughter was in a class with a child who threw chairs and they regularly had to evacuate the entire classroom for safety reasons. They spent lots of lessons on edge and many children found it really upsetting and had a whole year of school really disrupted. So I think there’s a balance- with the best will in the world state schools can’t work miracles (they don’t have unlimited staff, lots of staff dont have specialist training, no resources and premises are often really small) and the best solution is one that looks at the needs of everyone, including the teachers and the other kids.

littlemousebigcheese · 11/09/2026 16:25

You can’t compare your sons because they are different. My daughter is autistic and has adhd and spd and struggled so much in primary school. I was called in at least 3 times a week. Minimum. It was so hard and I wish I had thought less about the stigma of a specialist setting and long term concerns over her future and more about the now. Ultimately he’s not settling and therefore not accessing the curriculum and by the sounds of it, neither are the rest of the class when he is unsettled. I fought hard to keep my daughter in mainstream and I often wish I hadn’t as I don’t think it was in her best interests overall. She’s in a specialist setting now and so much happier, I could kick myself for not trying earlier. It took a while as some settings are very extreme and she’s not in the same school as her sibling anymore plus I have to drive her but it’s honestly wonderful for her and I can actually think about the future now as she’s finally learning rather than in fight or flight mode 24/7

dustabsorber · 11/09/2026 16:25

Once he is 10, he is criminally liable for his actions.

Ansjovis · 11/09/2026 16:26

Daisychains26 · 11/09/2026 16:13

DD was in a class with a boy who threw chairs and scissors when upset due to unmet special needs. I felt for the child and his parents but to be honest it was a relief when he was removed. She talked about it a lot.

Specialist provision (of which there definitely isn’t enough) is there for a reason. Please try and get a place for your son.

I think this is an important viewpoint. A few years ago we had a child at Beavers who sounded very similar to the OP's son. Despite never having laid a finger on any of the other children, the behaviour most definitely had an impact on them. We couldn't meet this child's needs either and the parents refused to engage with any of our concerns in any way. On both of those points we really tried but were limited on what we could reasonably do.

I would ask for a meeting with the school to establish what they intend to do. Because if the funding they have is not sufficient to meet the child's needs then they need to be doing more than just sending him home. I think the school are in a difficult situation here as they've got to balance the needs of all children but if the system isn't working then sweeping it under the carpet will definitely benefit no-one.

Sinuhe · 11/09/2026 16:27

In the nicest possible way: the school has a duty of care towards all staff & children, not just your son. Having regular meltdowns with the the possibility of violence isn't something a class of 9yo should be exposed to on a regular basis.

Maybe specialist school is the right place for your son or at least a specialist 1:1 TA to help him regulate.

EarthaKittsVoice · 11/09/2026 16:28

Heronwatcher · 11/09/2026 16:23

Sorry but this is over simplifying it. It sounds as though the school was meeting need, but that the child list isn’t coping this year for some reason. The school may well be trying their best, but if a child doesn’t have a 1-1 and is exhibiting dangerous behaviour like throwing chairs what is the school meant to do? Yes if there is a staff member who can help, great, but what if it’s not working?

My daughter was in a class with a child who threw chairs and they regularly had to evacuate the entire classroom for safety reasons. They spent lots of lessons on edge and many children found it really upsetting and had a whole year of school really disrupted. So I think there’s a balance- with the best will in the world state schools can’t work miracles (they don’t have unlimited staff, lots of staff dont have specialist training, no resources and premises are often really small) and the best solution is one that looks at the needs of everyone, including the teachers and the other kids.

There have been cases of children with disbilities being managed out of schools. There has been cases where councils have had to pay compensation to the child/family due to not providing education to the child. A child cannot be off school because the school cannot facilitate them, they have to action a plan on where the child will go, if neccesary.

There is a legal requirement, from the school and council to educate the OP's child.

Carouselfish · 11/09/2026 16:29

I feel for you and for the school and other children. As a teacher, Im honestly in favour of cctv in schools so parents can be made aware of how their children are behaving and how teachers are working. Schools I know wouldnt call a parent in unless it was absolutely necessary.

brunettemic · 11/09/2026 16:29

Surely he just needs to go to a more appropriate setting?

Phineyj · 11/09/2026 16:32

EarthaKittsVoice · 11/09/2026 16:28

There have been cases of children with disbilities being managed out of schools. There has been cases where councils have had to pay compensation to the child/family due to not providing education to the child. A child cannot be off school because the school cannot facilitate them, they have to action a plan on where the child will go, if neccesary.

There is a legal requirement, from the school and council to educate the OP's child.

It is also terribly awkward because THIS IS THE GOVERNMENT'S PUBLISHED FUTURE STRATEGY.

Apologies for shouting but us SEN parents all feel like Cassandra at the moment.

NiftyKoala · 11/09/2026 16:32

For your son's sake I hope you listen to your husband.vYes it's hard to have to admit you need more help but it is ultimately going to help him. It's hard when our children struggle. It's hard to give up your ideas of how it would go, but your child needs more help. I hope you get it for him.

Phineyj · 11/09/2026 16:34

brunettemic · 11/09/2026 16:29

Surely he just needs to go to a more appropriate setting?

Yes, it is the school's job to work with the LA to get them to find one (on the generous assumption they can evidence they are compliant with the EHCP).

Instead they seem to be trying to make it OP's problem.

PickNMixwe · 11/09/2026 16:34

Home school him? Doesn't sound like it's working for anyone atm.

Kirbert2 · 11/09/2026 16:36

PickNMixwe · 11/09/2026 16:34

Home school him? Doesn't sound like it's working for anyone atm.

Homeschooling doesn't automatically work either, especially when the parent has to work.

If mainstream isn't appropriate, the school need to work with the LA to find him an appropriate setting.

Phineyj · 11/09/2026 16:36

The husband is probably a bit delusional tbh if he thinks a new school setting can be found so easily. If he were serious HE would be doing the legwork, the meetings, the phone calls and the research...

myfourbubbas1 · 11/09/2026 16:36

Jacobator · 11/09/2026 13:19

Sorry this is long and probably doesnt make much sense but i am so fed up and dont really know if im being unreasonable anymore.

I have 2 boys, 12 and 9, both have additional needs although they are very different. DS2 has always been harder in school but usually he manages and we have never had anything like this before. Since going back this September he has apparently been having what they call explosive behaviour and he has now been sent home several times. One day they rang me before lunch and said i needed to collect him because he wasnt able to calm down and they didnt have the staff to keep him safe.

I did collect him because what else can i do, but then its happening again and again. Yesterday they rang and said basically they cant meet his needs at the moment. I said well what does that actually mean because he is supposed to be in school and not sitting at home with me because you dont have enough staff.

They keep saying they are not excluding him and that its a “temporary arrangement” while they look at what support he needs. Sorry but if my child is being told to stay at home because school cant cope with him, what exactly do they think an exclusion is??

I have asked about his support plan and whether they have actually done everything that is in it and i get lots of meetings and people saying they are concerned but nobody seems to actually have an answer. I dont want to keep having arguments with the school because obviously DS has to go there and i dont want things getting worse for him, but i also cant just accept him being kept home every time he has a meltdown.

DH thinks im making this harder than it needs to be and says we should look at specialist provision. I know he might be right but i dont want DS2 being put somewhere just because his current school doesnt want the bother. His brother is at the same school and they are very close, and DS2 already feels different enough without being taken away and told he needs a special school.

And before anyone says we should just pay for extra help, we actually do. Between therapy, assessments, things for school, transport and other bits we are spending over £2,000 a month at the moment. Yes i know thats a lot. We arent sitting on a pile of money, it is coming out of our savings and some of the things are because we have been told to get them privately because waiting lists are ridiculous. Im not saying that means the school owes us anything, just that its frustrating to constantly be told to get more support when we are already trying everything we can.

I am not pretending DS is easy. He can be very difficult when he is overwhelmed and i know the other children need to be safe too. But surely the answer cant just be send him home until he behaves normally? He cant learn how to manage school if he isnt actually allowed to be at school.

DH says im refusing to accept that he needs specialist help and maybe i am. I just feel like once we go down that road thats it, he gets labelled and everyone gives up trying to make mainstream work.

So AIBU to be pushing back on this and saying they cant keep sending him home because they “cant cope”? Or am i the one refusing to accept reality here?

There is no shame in 'labels'... Labels mean that your child can get the help and support that he needs.

The fact that your son is having these meltdowns is proof in itself that the environment isn't the right place for him. Please don't underestimate the damage that this is causing both mentally and to his education, how can a child learn in an environment that doesn't make them feel safe?

If school are staying that they are unable to meet his needs then get that in writing, if they feel they can't then they should be applying for an EHCP, if they're not then you can do it yourself.

An EHCP isn't just for now, that will see him through until he leaves education and beyond so it's vital you get this in place if that's what he needs. If he's not coping now then how on earth will he manage when he gets to secondary age? I realise it's hard but you're nit just thinking about now, you need to think about the future too.

Take it from someone who should have pushed harder.

Join the Not Fine in School facebook page they are an amazing support for anyone with children struggling.

Phineyj · 11/09/2026 16:37

Kirbert2 · 11/09/2026 16:36

Homeschooling doesn't automatically work either, especially when the parent has to work.

If mainstream isn't appropriate, the school need to work with the LA to find him an appropriate setting.

Edited

If forced on the parent that's off rolling.

Phineyj · 11/09/2026 16:37

myfourbubbas1 · 11/09/2026 16:36

There is no shame in 'labels'... Labels mean that your child can get the help and support that he needs.

The fact that your son is having these meltdowns is proof in itself that the environment isn't the right place for him. Please don't underestimate the damage that this is causing both mentally and to his education, how can a child learn in an environment that doesn't make them feel safe?

If school are staying that they are unable to meet his needs then get that in writing, if they feel they can't then they should be applying for an EHCP, if they're not then you can do it yourself.

An EHCP isn't just for now, that will see him through until he leaves education and beyond so it's vital you get this in place if that's what he needs. If he's not coping now then how on earth will he manage when he gets to secondary age? I realise it's hard but you're nit just thinking about now, you need to think about the future too.

Take it from someone who should have pushed harder.

Join the Not Fine in School facebook page they are an amazing support for anyone with children struggling.

The child has an EHCP.

Kirbert2 · 11/09/2026 16:38

Phineyj · 11/09/2026 16:37

If forced on the parent that's off rolling.

Yep.

If school really think mainstream isn't suitable, they need to inform the LA.

Heronwatcher · 11/09/2026 16:40

EarthaKittsVoice · 11/09/2026 16:28

There have been cases of children with disbilities being managed out of schools. There has been cases where councils have had to pay compensation to the child/family due to not providing education to the child. A child cannot be off school because the school cannot facilitate them, they have to action a plan on where the child will go, if neccesary.

There is a legal requirement, from the school and council to educate the OP's child.

Yes absolutely, but if the school is trying but can’t meet need then the LA need to find a new place. Which can take many months/ years and also is incredibly difficult if the parent is not on board and, frankly, on the LA’s case 24/7. In the meantime the school has a child who isn’t coping and has to deal with this, often to the detriment of the other kids and teachers.

In this situation it’s just not fair for the parent to say “no keep him he’s entitled to an education” and refuse to work with the school if they can.

And yes some schools do get it wrong, 💯 but in the examples I have seen the school hasn’t tried to get a child out vindictively, they’ve just been put in an impossible situation between a crap LA, upset child and angry parent.

Jacobator · 11/09/2026 16:40

If i was at work i would obviously have to leave work, what else am i supposed to do if the school ring and say they cant keep him safe? Luckily i can usually get there but it isnt ideal and ive already had to cancel things because of it.

And i dont expect the teacher to sit with him 1 to 1 for an hour while everyone else does nothing. Thats not realistic. What i have been asking is why there isnt a plan for when they can see hes starting to get overwhelmed, because it doesnt normally go from completely fine to throwing a chair in 2 seconds.

I have asked DS why he does it. He says he gets angry when things are too noisy and when he doesnt understand what hes meant to be doing. He also says he hates being told off in front of everyone because then he gets embarrassed and it makes him more angry.

I dont think he thinks throwing things is acceptable. We have talked about it loads and he knows its not. But knowing something is wrong doesnt always mean he can stop himself once hes got to that point, thats the whole issue.

The before lunch thing is interesting because most of the calls have been late morning. I hadnt really noticed that until someone pointed it out. He does eat breakfast but he is quite fussy and sometimes barely eats his school snack. I will ask him about that.

I also dont know what lessons they have been happening in but i can ask. Last year he was sitting near the back with a quieter group and this year he is apparently nearer the door. I dont know if that is making a difference but it could be.

I havent actually been inside the new classroom properly. I have seen it from the doorway but thats about it. I might ask if i can have a look because maybe there is something obvious that none of us have thought about.

The idea of giving him a little job before he gets to that point might actually work because he likes being useful and he used to help his old teacher with things. His old teacher would sometimes send him to get something and he would come back much calmer.

I am not against trying these things at all. This is why im frustrated that the answer seems to be either keep sending him home or move him to specialist provision. Surely there can be something in between while we work out what is actually going on.

OP posts:
roaringdragon · 11/09/2026 16:41

Pixiedust49 · 11/09/2026 16:01

Having worked in education for many years now funding is woefully inadequate. As is retention of staff. Especially staff expected to work with violent and disruptive pupils.

As LAs have been shown time and again, lacking of funding, resources and/or staffing is not a lawful excuse for acting unlawfully. The same applies to schools.

Autumnleaveandthegrass · 11/09/2026 16:41

You need support from a send advocate or SENDIAS.

Each time they send him home it’s an ilegal exclusion. You need to say that you will only collect him if they provide the exclusion paperwork.

You also need to ask for an earl review of ECHP as school clearly can’t meet his needs.

Binnyforthewin · 11/09/2026 16:42

Phineyj · 11/09/2026 16:37

If forced on the parent that's off rolling.

And it masks the failings of the local authority who have a statutory responsibility to provide education to all children.

You need to push for changes to the EHCP to get an appropriate setting allocated and funded. Sadly in my experience local authorities seem to prefer wasting council tax money losing cases at tribunal than making the right decisions in the first place.

Manthide · 11/09/2026 16:42

Ds23 had a one to one and a IEP at primary school and it was a real help. As he got older the support became less (his original one to one died suddenly and they never really replaced her). He started getting very overwhelmed, holding it in at school and then having huge meltdowns at home. I knew our local secondary school would have been a nightmare for him so we looked at private schools. He really liked the feel of them but I told him he'd have to get a full bursary to get in so he needed to put in a lot of effort. He was quite behind in reading and compression so we worked on it everyday. He was eventually awarded bursaries at two private schools and he chose the single sex one. They were amazing with him, knew when he was overwhelmed and just got him. He graduated last year with a first class MEng and was headhunted from university for his dream job. He still has issues but moving school was the best decision we ever made.

roaringdragon · 11/09/2026 16:43

Be careful with SENDIASS. Some are good but too many repeat the LA’s unlawful policies.

Similarly, advocates are unregulated business. While some are good, there are some who do more harm than good.