Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Whole families on UC, PIP, DLA and carers' allowance for each other?

1000 replies

Hutinthemiddleofnowhere · 05/09/2026 23:03

This isn't a bashing, rather a genuine observation and we're privileged in the UK to have support with benefits and disabilities.

Having adopted 2 siblings with special needs over a decade ago it opened me up to a whole new world to me. With DC in specialist schools and needing a lot of intervention from agencies and medical support I've met so many parents and children. As a teacher this was so insightful and, while having always been extra devoted to students who had difficulties, my own experience as a parent took it to another level.

Teaching, I was always aware and sympathetic to those who barely made it to lesson, almost fell asleep but professionally had to adhere to the 'not participating' and when told to 'fuck off' it was call out. I knew there would be further investigation as to why they act like this by more able and senior colleagues. Didn't take it personally but, as you can imagine, it's difficult when you have several students like this while under the pressure of teaching a tricky maths part of the syllabus.

So as a parent of ND DC I experienced it from the other side. It was very difficult because our DC were causing disruptions due to their severe diagnosis.

Throughout our journey and specialist schools I saw a lot of reality. This comes (finally) back to my point. Year after year it became blatantly obvious that the vast majority of children have parents with their own issues, whether hereditary or learnt behaviour.

I got a job at the primary school as a liason officer so met most parents. All lovely and care about their DC but sadly struggled with managing themselves, their homes etc. Those few who weren't eligible for taxis and escorts (walkable distance) relied heavily on GPs to take and pick up from school. There were some parents who did drive and drop off, like me, but it was about 5%.

So mostly the parents were on UC, claimed PIp for anxiety and MH, got DLA for all DC and also carers' allowance for looking after DC. While i visited it was clear they were were reclusive, their days were spent watching TV, gaming, DC picked up in a taxi and they had struggled to get out of bed, knew they are provided breakfast at school, went back to bed. Yes I've seen this on an early morning visit multiple times.

I understand but also a part of me felt frustrated that they had fallen into a rut, able bodied, could have long conversations, but have had so much support that has enabled this.

As a school we reached out to parents to come and integrate, provided workshops, held informal educational classes how we can help our DC. As a parent and before being employed there I attended these and it so nice to meet other parents. The reality... they just sat there, being served coffee by an already busy TA, talked all the way through the presentations then left, after already leaving several times for a smoke during an hour and half get together. Still as an attending parent at this point I could see TA was struggling so stepped in to help serve the refreshments, set up equipment and clear up afterwards. One Mum asked me to open a window, another asked to give her some biscuits...I was the same as them, a parent, but they were just totally oblivious to the situation.

Then walking out, having cleaned up and they were chatting outside, all I heard was that was so boring, I know how to bring up my kids, waste of time coming out, so what you doing now, probably Netflix.

Then getting the role and seeing deeper into their lifestyles it confirmed that actually so many of these parents had come from a generational cycle with low aspirations and no encouragement within modern education, social workers or support from us all could change their mindsets of behaviour. Sadly it really is a case of we get money, DC have their consoles, school provides meals and exercise, bags of amazing stuff at Christmas and end of year which we don't even say thank you for, we can complain online if we don't like something etc.

This is just the basic circumstances, delve deeper and you would be shocked at how some of these poor kids live. A whole different thread would have to be made about drug dealing, violence, not allowing DC in the house so they have to become one of the balaclava gangs and so much more.

As parents, even if we have our own issues, we all need to put our DC first, not rely on others to do it for us.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
x2boys · 11/09/2026 07:41

Anon501178 · 11/09/2026 03:01

No these people were buying them from JD sports etc, for about £100 a time....then moaned that they couldn't afford to buy their son a birthday cake :(
They had the latest mobiles, fancy bikes, Home entertainment system etc etc.Both had never worked a day in their life and didn't intend to.The dad inparticular was more than capable of doing so, but why would he when the state was bank rolling his luxury lifestyle...

Nobody has a luxury lifestyle on universal credit .

FirmSnake · 11/09/2026 08:31

x2boys · 11/09/2026 07:41

Nobody has a luxury lifestyle on universal credit .

Edited

Relative to most of the world and most of history they do... if it was really that awful to live on, we wouldn't have increasing numbers doing it.

x2boys · 11/09/2026 08:35

FirmSnake · 11/09/2026 08:31

Relative to most of the world and most of history they do... if it was really that awful to live on, we wouldn't have increasing numbers doing it.

Well its all relative
But its not enough the latest phones ,
Gadgets
£100 pair of trainers.

Owninterpreter · 11/09/2026 08:38

Busybeemumm · 11/09/2026 07:29

I think you misinterpreted what I said about India. People who don't have a safety net (or benefits) have to find work whatever that might be to eat. I think that it's great we have a safety net so the most vulnerable don't suffer. However it's open to abuse and doesn't make people have to work in order to eat. There are people who abuse the system, present as homeless at 16/18 get themselves into the system of council housing and benefits and find themselves trapped in that cycle. In other countries the poorest are still aspirational as they know they will have to work whatever happens.

It might keep people aspiring to work but India has one of the lowest rankings in the world for upwards mobility. (UK is 21, India 76 - out of 82 countries evaluated)

There are also millions of children doing things like selling pens or flowers on the streets to support thier parents who dont make enough to feed them.

I know you said that you are glad there is a safety net so you arent suggesting we have street children but I don't really believe the poorest in India are aspiring to do the type of work they do, they are wanting to not starve. Its a funny turn of phrase. Really its poor people have to do unpleasant work and rely on child labour not to starve and the majority will remain in that lifestyle. I think they aspire to break out of that.

FirmSnake · 11/09/2026 08:48

x2boys · 11/09/2026 08:35

Well its all relative
But its not enough the latest phones ,
Gadgets
£100 pair of trainers.

Isn't it? If you say so.

FirmSnake · 11/09/2026 08:51

Owninterpreter · 11/09/2026 08:38

It might keep people aspiring to work but India has one of the lowest rankings in the world for upwards mobility. (UK is 21, India 76 - out of 82 countries evaluated)

There are also millions of children doing things like selling pens or flowers on the streets to support thier parents who dont make enough to feed them.

I know you said that you are glad there is a safety net so you arent suggesting we have street children but I don't really believe the poorest in India are aspiring to do the type of work they do, they are wanting to not starve. Its a funny turn of phrase. Really its poor people have to do unpleasant work and rely on child labour not to starve and the majority will remain in that lifestyle. I think they aspire to break out of that.

But where did OP say that we should be like India? Looking at other ways of doing things and finding a middle ground isnt the same as saying "I wish we had street kids"... this sort of hyperbole is really unnecessary.

x2boys · 11/09/2026 08:56

FirmSnake · 11/09/2026 08:48

Isn't it? If you say so.

I know as i get it
And having a severly disabled child
We get more than most
Ww can afford to live
But im not swanning around in designer gear none of us are.
My phone was £69.99 from samsung
So not the latest I phone or whatever

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:05

Busybeemumm · 11/09/2026 07:29

I think you misinterpreted what I said about India. People who don't have a safety net (or benefits) have to find work whatever that might be to eat. I think that it's great we have a safety net so the most vulnerable don't suffer. However it's open to abuse and doesn't make people have to work in order to eat. There are people who abuse the system, present as homeless at 16/18 get themselves into the system of council housing and benefits and find themselves trapped in that cycle. In other countries the poorest are still aspirational as they know they will have to work whatever happens.

A single person on UC gets just over 434 pounds a month. in my area being pregnant doesn't give you any more priority for a council house. At the moment where I live there are 14k people waiting for a council flat or house. Some have been waiting decades which is why so many people end up in private rented accommodation

Im not suggesting that no one abuses the benefits system but the majority of people do not. As I said earlier in the thread if they think getting LCWRA or Pip is easy they should go through the process of trying to get it.

You seem to be suggesting that having no safety net is a good thing. There are people in India who live in abject poverty. They do jobs for peanuts that have been outsourced by companies who make millions because it's cheaper to hire them than hire UK staff. I don't see that as much to celebrate. If someone presented as homeless in my area they would be placed into a B and B. Not given the keys to a council house

x2boys · 11/09/2026 09:08

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:05

A single person on UC gets just over 434 pounds a month. in my area being pregnant doesn't give you any more priority for a council house. At the moment where I live there are 14k people waiting for a council flat or house. Some have been waiting decades which is why so many people end up in private rented accommodation

Im not suggesting that no one abuses the benefits system but the majority of people do not. As I said earlier in the thread if they think getting LCWRA or Pip is easy they should go through the process of trying to get it.

You seem to be suggesting that having no safety net is a good thing. There are people in India who live in abject poverty. They do jobs for peanuts that have been outsourced by companies who make millions because it's cheaper to hire them than hire UK staff. I don't see that as much to celebrate. If someone presented as homeless in my area they would be placed into a B and B. Not given the keys to a council house

Agreed
And even a B and B is 100 times better than how the most impoverished are living in india

Owninterpreter · 11/09/2026 09:09

FirmSnake · 11/09/2026 08:51

But where did OP say that we should be like India? Looking at other ways of doing things and finding a middle ground isnt the same as saying "I wish we had street kids"... this sort of hyperbole is really unnecessary.

The person is responded to mentioned India?

I felt I was pretty clear that I understood they werent advocating for street children and they were glad of a safety net. But I will repeat that. Noone is advocating for that situation.

I was pointing out I didnt think that there example was very good as india has worse social mobility than us, and i didnt think people having to work to not starve was the same creating an aspiration to work its creating a necessity.

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 09:10

Getting ESA is not difficult.

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:11

x2boys · 11/09/2026 08:56

I know as i get it
And having a severly disabled child
We get more than most
Ww can afford to live
But im not swanning around in designer gear none of us are.
My phone was £69.99 from samsung
So not the latest I phone or whatever

I'm on UC as well and my phone is an android on a contract. I pay 21 quid a month for it. I don't have luxury trainers. I buy my trainers from eBay. The last pair cost me something like 7 quid. The pair before that cost 7 quid front a charity shop. I currently get ADP and LCWRA. Both are due to be reviewed soon and I'm expecting most to come to an end. I don't live a luxury lifestyle. I know people on UC and who get LCWRA who still struggle financially but that's not the kind of person people want to talk about

Everyone has to have the latest iPhone and go on several holidays a year and be milking the system and conning the DWP.

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 09:15

I am working full time and have a cracked ancient phone and my trainers were from the bargain bin in decathlon.

None of that is unusual. Many of us don't have much money and work.

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:16

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 09:10

Getting ESA is not difficult.

That's if you qualify for new style ESA. I don't.

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:18

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 09:15

I am working full time and have a cracked ancient phone and my trainers were from the bargain bin in decathlon.

None of that is unusual. Many of us don't have much money and work.

I don't think anyone is disputing that. The issue is that a lot of people look at people on UC and disability benefits as people with the latest iPhones and who live luxury lifestyles. It's been stated in this thread that that's the lifestyle you live if you are on benefits and get Pip.

Owninterpreter · 11/09/2026 09:21

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:18

I don't think anyone is disputing that. The issue is that a lot of people look at people on UC and disability benefits as people with the latest iPhones and who live luxury lifestyles. It's been stated in this thread that that's the lifestyle you live if you are on benefits and get Pip.

Exactly. People know workers have a range of lifestyles some very poor.

People believe people on universal credit with DLA/PIP and Carers are living luxury lifestyles.

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 09:23

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:16

That's if you qualify for new style ESA. I don't.

Then you get UC

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 09:23

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:18

I don't think anyone is disputing that. The issue is that a lot of people look at people on UC and disability benefits as people with the latest iPhones and who live luxury lifestyles. It's been stated in this thread that that's the lifestyle you live if you are on benefits and get Pip.

People can be very poor on benefits, but not everyone

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:24

Owninterpreter · 11/09/2026 09:21

Exactly. People know workers have a range of lifestyles some very poor.

People believe people on universal credit with DLA/PIP and Carers are living luxury lifestyles.

The issue is that some people see people on benefits as scroungers. I've certainly been called a scrounger far more often since I had an accident and ended up on disability benefits.

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:26

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 09:23

People can be very poor on benefits, but not everyone

I didn't say everyone. Until 18 months ago I was running a home on 396 pounds a month. I was poor. A single person on UC is not going to be living in luxury.

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:33

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 09:23

Then you get UC

Yes I get UC. I think I've said this more than once on the thread.

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:47

Hutinthemiddleofnowhere · 05/09/2026 23:03

This isn't a bashing, rather a genuine observation and we're privileged in the UK to have support with benefits and disabilities.

Having adopted 2 siblings with special needs over a decade ago it opened me up to a whole new world to me. With DC in specialist schools and needing a lot of intervention from agencies and medical support I've met so many parents and children. As a teacher this was so insightful and, while having always been extra devoted to students who had difficulties, my own experience as a parent took it to another level.

Teaching, I was always aware and sympathetic to those who barely made it to lesson, almost fell asleep but professionally had to adhere to the 'not participating' and when told to 'fuck off' it was call out. I knew there would be further investigation as to why they act like this by more able and senior colleagues. Didn't take it personally but, as you can imagine, it's difficult when you have several students like this while under the pressure of teaching a tricky maths part of the syllabus.

So as a parent of ND DC I experienced it from the other side. It was very difficult because our DC were causing disruptions due to their severe diagnosis.

Throughout our journey and specialist schools I saw a lot of reality. This comes (finally) back to my point. Year after year it became blatantly obvious that the vast majority of children have parents with their own issues, whether hereditary or learnt behaviour.

I got a job at the primary school as a liason officer so met most parents. All lovely and care about their DC but sadly struggled with managing themselves, their homes etc. Those few who weren't eligible for taxis and escorts (walkable distance) relied heavily on GPs to take and pick up from school. There were some parents who did drive and drop off, like me, but it was about 5%.

So mostly the parents were on UC, claimed PIp for anxiety and MH, got DLA for all DC and also carers' allowance for looking after DC. While i visited it was clear they were were reclusive, their days were spent watching TV, gaming, DC picked up in a taxi and they had struggled to get out of bed, knew they are provided breakfast at school, went back to bed. Yes I've seen this on an early morning visit multiple times.

I understand but also a part of me felt frustrated that they had fallen into a rut, able bodied, could have long conversations, but have had so much support that has enabled this.

As a school we reached out to parents to come and integrate, provided workshops, held informal educational classes how we can help our DC. As a parent and before being employed there I attended these and it so nice to meet other parents. The reality... they just sat there, being served coffee by an already busy TA, talked all the way through the presentations then left, after already leaving several times for a smoke during an hour and half get together. Still as an attending parent at this point I could see TA was struggling so stepped in to help serve the refreshments, set up equipment and clear up afterwards. One Mum asked me to open a window, another asked to give her some biscuits...I was the same as them, a parent, but they were just totally oblivious to the situation.

Then walking out, having cleaned up and they were chatting outside, all I heard was that was so boring, I know how to bring up my kids, waste of time coming out, so what you doing now, probably Netflix.

Then getting the role and seeing deeper into their lifestyles it confirmed that actually so many of these parents had come from a generational cycle with low aspirations and no encouragement within modern education, social workers or support from us all could change their mindsets of behaviour. Sadly it really is a case of we get money, DC have their consoles, school provides meals and exercise, bags of amazing stuff at Christmas and end of year which we don't even say thank you for, we can complain online if we don't like something etc.

This is just the basic circumstances, delve deeper and you would be shocked at how some of these poor kids live. A whole different thread would have to be made about drug dealing, violence, not allowing DC in the house so they have to become one of the balaclava gangs and so much more.

As parents, even if we have our own issues, we all need to put our DC first, not rely on others to do it for us.

The last line of this surprised me. You accepted a job as a school liaison officer and presumably the remit of your job was to support families. Then at the end of your post you say people need to put their DC first not rely on others to do it for us.

There are people who fall through every crack in the system. For reasons such as domestic violence. Being in relationships where they are co ercively controlled for example

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:56

Hutinthemiddleofnowhere · 05/09/2026 23:03

This isn't a bashing, rather a genuine observation and we're privileged in the UK to have support with benefits and disabilities.

Having adopted 2 siblings with special needs over a decade ago it opened me up to a whole new world to me. With DC in specialist schools and needing a lot of intervention from agencies and medical support I've met so many parents and children. As a teacher this was so insightful and, while having always been extra devoted to students who had difficulties, my own experience as a parent took it to another level.

Teaching, I was always aware and sympathetic to those who barely made it to lesson, almost fell asleep but professionally had to adhere to the 'not participating' and when told to 'fuck off' it was call out. I knew there would be further investigation as to why they act like this by more able and senior colleagues. Didn't take it personally but, as you can imagine, it's difficult when you have several students like this while under the pressure of teaching a tricky maths part of the syllabus.

So as a parent of ND DC I experienced it from the other side. It was very difficult because our DC were causing disruptions due to their severe diagnosis.

Throughout our journey and specialist schools I saw a lot of reality. This comes (finally) back to my point. Year after year it became blatantly obvious that the vast majority of children have parents with their own issues, whether hereditary or learnt behaviour.

I got a job at the primary school as a liason officer so met most parents. All lovely and care about their DC but sadly struggled with managing themselves, their homes etc. Those few who weren't eligible for taxis and escorts (walkable distance) relied heavily on GPs to take and pick up from school. There were some parents who did drive and drop off, like me, but it was about 5%.

So mostly the parents were on UC, claimed PIp for anxiety and MH, got DLA for all DC and also carers' allowance for looking after DC. While i visited it was clear they were were reclusive, their days were spent watching TV, gaming, DC picked up in a taxi and they had struggled to get out of bed, knew they are provided breakfast at school, went back to bed. Yes I've seen this on an early morning visit multiple times.

I understand but also a part of me felt frustrated that they had fallen into a rut, able bodied, could have long conversations, but have had so much support that has enabled this.

As a school we reached out to parents to come and integrate, provided workshops, held informal educational classes how we can help our DC. As a parent and before being employed there I attended these and it so nice to meet other parents. The reality... they just sat there, being served coffee by an already busy TA, talked all the way through the presentations then left, after already leaving several times for a smoke during an hour and half get together. Still as an attending parent at this point I could see TA was struggling so stepped in to help serve the refreshments, set up equipment and clear up afterwards. One Mum asked me to open a window, another asked to give her some biscuits...I was the same as them, a parent, but they were just totally oblivious to the situation.

Then walking out, having cleaned up and they were chatting outside, all I heard was that was so boring, I know how to bring up my kids, waste of time coming out, so what you doing now, probably Netflix.

Then getting the role and seeing deeper into their lifestyles it confirmed that actually so many of these parents had come from a generational cycle with low aspirations and no encouragement within modern education, social workers or support from us all could change their mindsets of behaviour. Sadly it really is a case of we get money, DC have their consoles, school provides meals and exercise, bags of amazing stuff at Christmas and end of year which we don't even say thank you for, we can complain online if we don't like something etc.

This is just the basic circumstances, delve deeper and you would be shocked at how some of these poor kids live. A whole different thread would have to be made about drug dealing, violence, not allowing DC in the house so they have to become one of the balaclava gangs and so much more.

As parents, even if we have our own issues, we all need to put our DC first, not rely on others to do it for us.

There are so many comments in this post where you are making value judgements on these people and comparing them to yourself. Talking about Netflix. Going outside for a smoke. Messy homes. Bags of Christmas presents that they don't say thank you for.

I live in an area that has huge pockets of deprivation. There's a baby bank in my area. I don't have much but for the last few years I've given presents to a charity that helps people who have very little. It helped over 10k people last year and they all need to be referred by agencies.

For every person living the lifestyle you seem to be describing there are other people who struggle badly. Women fleeing violence for example. And when you post a post like this you know people are going to come out saying that everyone on Pip lives a luxury lifestyle and it's so easy to get and everyone is on the take.

OneLilacHedgehog · 11/09/2026 10:39

YourGoldLurker · 11/09/2026 09:26

I didn't say everyone. Until 18 months ago I was running a home on 396 pounds a month. I was poor. A single person on UC is not going to be living in luxury.

No. But you can get £3000 a month or more on benefits. It's having kids and disability benefits that pushes it up.

roaringdragon · 11/09/2026 10:39

DontBuyAnotherBook · 11/09/2026 00:58

Been very depressing not having the first days of school because your child is doing a reduced timetable whilst all the other kids have fun.

If you want DS to attend full time, he can unless the school is formally suspending DS.

Then you get UC

It is possible to not be eligible for NS-ESA or UC. Not everyone is eligible for UC.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread