Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Jason Arday scandal

873 replies

Ilikesundays · 06/08/2026 21:55

To think that Cambridge University’s reputation has been shot to pieces by the revelations about ex-professor Jason Arday?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 22:57

LarkspurBlues · Yesterday 22:55

I’m doing puking emoji, @LuckyHazelFox

He even took the piss out of Stephen Hawking. I think most of us know at least one of his type. Butter wouldn't melt when the camera's on him.

LarkspurBlues · Yesterday 22:59

It’s quite the type. This week, all my friends have been texting ‘this should have been x’ and not all about the same person either. I’d love it if someone brought all those guys down.

thestudio · Yesterday 23:48

KatiePricesKnickers · Yesterday 20:36

He is the only person responsible for his predicament.

You think everything happens in a vacuum?

no. Literally the most cursory glance around your own personal environment would demonstrate that. Cause..dun dun DUN .. effect

He’s to blame at a personal level. But this has become an event at a societal level, and after that point things are much less clear.

how his personal failure/fraud is framed and by whom is probably more important than anything he’s actually done.

KatiePricesKnickers · Today 07:29

@thestudio ”He’s to blame at a personal level. But this has become an event at a societal level, and after that point things are much less clear.”

It’s a self inflicted spectacle, which is going to run and run, because Bullshit Jason is so conceited he’s written a fucking book, and hasn’t pulled it!!!!
You couldn’t make it up, except, he has!

In his book, I hear he explains how he invented the internet, and taught Bear Grylls how to survive in the wild.

AnonyMumAuDHD · Today 07:58

LarkspurBlues · Yesterday 22:18

I was t being satirical, there are several. Liars all round a bit like Arday is being billed as. The difference is they don’t get sacked. They can have lots of reviews by people who spot their work is bad, but once they’re already a prof they are too powerful to sack, it seems. They fail upwards and are often narcissistic types. Also, and this relates to the theme, they often work on ‘noble’ themes (which I suppose you’d call woke) and so frame everything as an attack on their values, when in fact they’re just bad individuals. Brazen individuals, who operate in plain sight.

Edited

He didn’t get sacked either? He resigned.

Takingtigermountainbystrategy · Today 10:03

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 07/08/2026 06:51

Bless him?

He’s a career liar and a fraud.

It’s not racist to have noticed this.

I agree. In fact I think it's racist to make allowances for it

LuckyHazelFox · Today 10:12

Takingtigermountainbystrategy · Today 10:03

I agree. In fact I think it's racist to make allowances for it

..yes references to old white men seem be perfectly acceptable.

Aluna · Today 10:16

Takingtigermountainbystrategy · Today 10:03

I agree. In fact I think it's racist to make allowances for it

There seems to be very little awareness on this thread of contemporary discourse around racism and definitions.

YourAmplePlumPoster · Today 10:26

Surely the most egregious incident is the police investigating a journalist for doing his job. We know they go after people for tweets. Now they're going after journalists.
Jack Grove: I was reported to police over the Jason Arday case. I was just doing my job https://share.google/ARKO9ngumvmN98OLS

I was reported to police over the Arday case. I was just doing my job

My investigation into alleged plagiarism was undertaken seriously – journalistic enquiries should not be a matter for Scotland Yard, writes THE reporter Jack Grove

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/i-was-reported-police-over-arday-case-i-was-just-doing-my-job

Takingtigermountainbystrategy · Today 10:44

Aluna · Today 10:16

There seems to be very little awareness on this thread of contemporary discourse around racism and definitions.

I think having different standards because of someone's race ( or sex) is inherently patronising. It assumes a lower ability,

notwavingbutdrowning1 · Today 10:48

Aluna · Today 10:16

There seems to be very little awareness on this thread of contemporary discourse around racism and definitions.

Completely agree. Also there is an ignorance of the structural nature of racism. Everything is seen in terms of individuals on one hand, gross generalisations on the other.

heartsinvisiblefury · Today 10:50

There are a lot of people who must have also enabled his behaviour. A lot of people are to blame. What a mess.

OonaStubbs · Today 10:51

Did none of the students who he lectured to not realise that something was amiss?

TidyRose · Today 11:04

OonaStubbs · Today 10:51

Did none of the students who he lectured to not realise that something was amiss?

I read that one complained and was ignored and criticised as being racist.

JudgeJ · Today 11:09

AInightingale · Yesterday 20:22

Wonder what S&S will do about his memoir. Surely he can't be seen to profit from it. Most of his claims seem to be lies, his doctorate was obtained fraudulently, and his students have had their prospects damaged as he wouldn't or couldn't supervise them properly, or to the required standard. It would be immoral if he was allowed to keep his advance or pocket royalties from his book.

Maybe put it in the fiction section as a good Christmas laugh?

LuckyHazelFox · Today 11:10

notwavingbutdrowning1 · Today 10:48

Completely agree. Also there is an ignorance of the structural nature of racism. Everything is seen in terms of individuals on one hand, gross generalisations on the other.

Racism is not the theme
here, academic cheating and fabricating tall stories is.

JudgeJ · Today 11:16

Aluna · Yesterday 21:27

So - help me with this, the fact of the historic slave trade makes you feel so defensive that you feel the need to mention that black people were involved too. And other cultures/empires.

What’s the purpose of this?

Edited

To add in intelligent comment to the polarised discussion maybe? Because one recognises that the history of the slave trade is not as simplistic as many seem to think doesn't make one 'defensive', just better informed.

FOJN · Today 11:18

OonaStubbs · Today 10:51

Did none of the students who he lectured to not realise that something was amiss?

There were multiple complaints made about the supervision he provided. As a PP mentioned the students were dismissed as racists. I believe some students are asking for their grades to be re-examined and there is debate on "law tube" about whether former students have grounds for suing the university.

LuckyHazelFox · Today 11:19

Are you returning @Ilikesundays as your thread will soon be full.

notwavingbutdrowning1 · Today 11:19

LuckyHazelFox · Today 11:10

Racism is not the theme
here, academic cheating and fabricating tall stories is.

Racism has been the theme for many posters on this thread. The ones who use the abhorrent expression 'playing the race card', for example.

LuckyHazelFox · Today 11:21

notwavingbutdrowning1 · Today 11:19

Racism has been the theme for many posters on this thread. The ones who use the abhorrent expression 'playing the race card', for example.

Arday introduced race when he wanted to silence people getting closer to his lies.

notwavingbutdrowning1 · Today 11:23

LuckyHazelFox · Today 11:21

Arday introduced race when he wanted to silence people getting closer to his lies.

Two things can be true at once. He can be a victim of racism but also guilty of lying about his achievements.

OonaStubbs · Today 11:23

Would this be possible in a STEM subject? Surely University professors should actually have to understand what they are talking about in order to get and keep their job?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread