Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Jason Arday scandal

586 replies

Ilikesundays · 06/08/2026 21:55

To think that Cambridge University’s reputation has been shot to pieces by the revelations about ex-professor Jason Arday?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
DuchessDandelion · Yesterday 19:11

Angeruish · Yesterday 18:41

Exactly.

I don't think most British people born before 1990 (?) had even heard of Rosa Parks growing up. But everyone born since has been force fed stories of her, almost as if she were one of our own.

George Floyd was American. The BLM movement came from him.

American footballer Colin Kaepernick was the first to take the knee before a match. For a time it looked as if it was compulsory in Premier League matches.

Even the dreaded n-word is American, whereas forty years ago it was only known as something from Huckleberry Finn.

Nearly all the rap songs that use the n-word, and call for attacks on the police, are American.

British society has swallowed American views on all of this. Whole and undigested.

I wonder how many current British schoolchildren realise that there were never black slaves in the UK? That there were effectively no black people here until the 1950s? That the 1960s may have been characterised by the civil rights movement across the Atlantic, where there was still massive discrimination, but here we were swinging and it was all about mini skirts, Profumo, the Beatles and the end of the Chatterly ban.

History is being rewritten before our eyes, and we are being forced to sign up to American guilt.

Your statements are objectively wrong, to pull out just two: there may not have been massive plantations, but there were black slaves in the UK and black people have been present in these lands throughout history.

FOJN · Yesterday 19:17

Chenecinquantecinq · Yesterday 17:28

For anyone arguing in favour of him read some of the actual shit that they believed, even my elderly parents in their 80's would not have fallen for it 😂

Utter rot has set in at most of our Universities Cambridge leading the way!

One of his biggest supporters at Cambridge was Simon Baron Cohen who happens to be Sasha's cousin. The absurdity of it all is very Sasha Baron Cohen.

His memoir is released on the 11th.

🤔

Noodledog · Yesterday 19:18

My favourite claim by Jason Arday is that soon after his doctorate, he lost all memory of it due to a medical issue (I think it might be a brain tumour?)

I mean, it's a fantastic way of getting out of defending it, provided of course you can find people gullible enough to believe it 😁

Angeruish · Yesterday 19:19

DuchessDandelion · Yesterday 19:11

Your statements are objectively wrong, to pull out just two: there may not have been massive plantations, but there were black slaves in the UK and black people have been present in these lands throughout history.

That's just not true. Any such numbers were vanishingly small.

But the media and others have decided they are going to convince you otherwise, to justify the current situation.

I can't imagine I am going to convince you otherwise, and shall not bother trying.

Talkinpeace · Yesterday 19:19

Friday night entertainment for the wonderful Mumsnet hive mind

https://x.com/GrumpyOW/status/2085743542291296679
Class photo time .... More details of which Sunday school he was chatty at ...

Also
When DID he buy his dreads
https://x.com/AjaTheEmpress/status/2085716564884562417

Sidsy (@GrumpyOW) on X

Tik Tok account says he was at Heathbrook Primary School with Jason Arday who was far from mute...

https://x.com/GrumpyOW/status/2085743542291296679

DuchessDandelion · Yesterday 19:21

Angeruish · Yesterday 19:19

That's just not true. Any such numbers were vanishingly small.

But the media and others have decided they are going to convince you otherwise, to justify the current situation.

I can't imagine I am going to convince you otherwise, and shall not bother trying.

Not the media, contemporary evidence dating back through Georgian, early modern and medieval periods.

Dutch1e · Yesterday 19:26

LifeBeginsToday · Yesterday 07:32

This is really sad. I am an autistic academic and looked up to him to what can be achieved. To see that it was all lies has shaken me.

The achievements stand regardless.

Say what you like about the man, he aimed high. I quite like the entire story, it's like a real-time version of the story behind the movie Catch Me If You Can, and really shows how many flaws there are in academia as a whole.

(Not the intelligence or the dedication of academics, I mean the system as a shaky whole).

Jane379 · Yesterday 19:27

snurtifier · Yesterday 18:29

A fuller quote from the blog post in question reads:

Under a colorblind system that judged applicants only by academic qualifications, blacks would make up 0.7% of Harvard students. (Even that might be an overestimate, since high-school credentials are sometimes given a boost by affirmative action.) In a meritocracy, Harvard faculty would be recruited from the best of the best students, which means the number of black professors would approach 0%. Blacks would disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment.

I don't think he's making a moral claim there. He's pointing out the consequences of abolishing affirmative action and DEI, given the current levels of educational attainment among different ethnic groups in the US. (He goes on to suggest that this is a reason not to do it, because it would lead to too great a backlash.)

Having said that, his politics clearly are very right-wing.

Like I say, it's a troubling case. Is it an example of fearless truth-centred inquiry to analyse the scientific literature around race and IQ, as he has, and conclude that there's a hereditary link? Or is it an academic fig leaf for racism? I don't know, but I like to think that if the latter is the case it ought to be possible to refute his position intellectually rather than just dismissing it because it's poitically unacceptable.

'if the latter is the case it ought to be possible to refute his position intellectually'

  • I think it is. I'm not an expert but a lot of Cofnas' points seem similar to The Bell Curve which has been critiqued by Thomas Sowell among others. More generally, from what I've seen on Substack (where there are a lot of these types) a lot of them rely on data collected by Richard Lynn on IQ which has quite a few flaws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynn

Richard Lynn - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynn

noblegiraffe · Yesterday 19:43

snurtifier · Yesterday 18:29

A fuller quote from the blog post in question reads:

Under a colorblind system that judged applicants only by academic qualifications, blacks would make up 0.7% of Harvard students. (Even that might be an overestimate, since high-school credentials are sometimes given a boost by affirmative action.) In a meritocracy, Harvard faculty would be recruited from the best of the best students, which means the number of black professors would approach 0%. Blacks would disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment.

I don't think he's making a moral claim there. He's pointing out the consequences of abolishing affirmative action and DEI, given the current levels of educational attainment among different ethnic groups in the US. (He goes on to suggest that this is a reason not to do it, because it would lead to too great a backlash.)

Having said that, his politics clearly are very right-wing.

Like I say, it's a troubling case. Is it an example of fearless truth-centred inquiry to analyse the scientific literature around race and IQ, as he has, and conclude that there's a hereditary link? Or is it an academic fig leaf for racism? I don't know, but I like to think that if the latter is the case it ought to be possible to refute his position intellectually rather than just dismissing it because it's poitically unacceptable.

The fuller quote isn't context that justifies the claim though.

Under a colorblind system that judged applicants only by academic qualifications, blacks would make up 0.7% of Harvard students. (Even that might be an overestimate, since high-school credentials are sometimes given a boost by affirmative action.) In a meritocracy, Harvard faculty would be recruited from the best of the best students, which means the number of black professors would approach 0%.

Why is the 'meritocracy' standard assumed to be academic success alone? The link shows that Harvard recruits based also on a six-point personal rating, a six-point athletics rating, and a six-point extracurricular one. Is a person who scores perfectly in exams but who is just hothoused with no outside interests who can't relate to other people better suited to being a Harvard student or professor? In his blog post he doesn't even mention the other criteria and leaves it to the reader to assume that the other ways of measuring the suitability of a Harvard candidate are merely 'woke' and not at all valid.

Blacks would disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment.

So he neatly segues from his assertion about a meritocracy at Harvard into a general assertion about all high profile positions, as if Harvard is a microcosm of society and as if extreme academic success ought to be the only requirement to attain any high profile position in a meritocracy (outside of sports and entertainment which I assume he begrudgingly admits require athleticism or performance skills more than good SATs). But that's clearly not true.

I mean, you're saying that the context makes it less racist, but imo it makes it not only racist, but also stupid. If this dildo were working in a meritocracy, he certainly wouldn't have any academic appointment, and not just because he is expressing difficult ideas, but because his arguments are terrible.

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 19:44

SevenYellowHammers · Yesterday 18:29

Ok, I read the Guardian article last night and felt it was more about questioning what could have happened than being particularly accusatory. The way I read it was that the young man was built up perhaps promoted before his time because Cambridge desperately wanted to smoke screen their woeful diversity record. Which smacks of racism.

But we all experience being a bit out of our depth sometimes, no?

The reason I feel that JA has treated unfairly is that he’s been subject to more scrutiny than his white middle class peers.

I also watched Krishna Guru-Murthy’s longish interview with JA and I thought it was impressive. He’s articulate but uses accessible language; much like Professor Brian Cox who makes complicated physics easy to understand.

You could argue it’s dumbing down but on other hand it could encourage people to go on to more high brow reading.

Nathan Cofnas who is JA’s main adversary said: [black people would] disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment" in a true NeroHe’s clearly using Jason (I did cut and paste that quote just to be clear. 😜 It sounds like he’s worked hard at getting this case to fit his hypothesis.

In essence, having read around case as much as I’ve time for (not a lot), I do believe Jason has been victim of a witch hunt. I also believe that plagiarism needs a proper sort out because using AI to say something was likely plagiarism doesn’t cut it for me. Remember AI is unreliable and tries to give the answers it wants in order to keep you consuming.

Finally, truth seems to be an increasingly intangible commodity these days. It seemed obvious that Lucy Letby was guilty once didn’t it? Now people are not so sure. I admit my reasoning is based on hunch as well as reading around case. But it wouldn’t be the first time that a young black man was set up, would it?

I have heard it all now - a young black man has been set up. Absolutely unreal.

DuchessDandelion · Yesterday 19:49

@LifeBeginsToday don't be discouraged, academia brims with the neurodivergent.

Jane379 · Yesterday 19:52

Angeruish · Yesterday 18:41

Exactly.

I don't think most British people born before 1990 (?) had even heard of Rosa Parks growing up. But everyone born since has been force fed stories of her, almost as if she were one of our own.

George Floyd was American. The BLM movement came from him.

American footballer Colin Kaepernick was the first to take the knee before a match. For a time it looked as if it was compulsory in Premier League matches.

Even the dreaded n-word is American, whereas forty years ago it was only known as something from Huckleberry Finn.

Nearly all the rap songs that use the n-word, and call for attacks on the police, are American.

British society has swallowed American views on all of this. Whole and undigested.

I wonder how many current British schoolchildren realise that there were never black slaves in the UK? That there were effectively no black people here until the 1950s? That the 1960s may have been characterised by the civil rights movement across the Atlantic, where there was still massive discrimination, but here we were swinging and it was all about mini skirts, Profumo, the Beatles and the end of the Chatterly ban.

History is being rewritten before our eyes, and we are being forced to sign up to American guilt.

Which do you mean? Do you mean there were no black slaves in the UK, and black people on general have been absent totally throughout history?

Very small numbers are not the same as zero.

There certainly were slaves in London, otherwise how would these historic cases have happened?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Strong_(slave)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somerset_v_Stewart

I agree numbers were small until Windrush era but they were not zero. They were in the low hundreds in the Tudor era and the low thousands in the 18th century. Examples include John Blanke, (Tudor era) Dido Belle, Ignatius Sancho, Francis Barber, Olaudah Equiano, Ottobah Cuogano (18th century), Fanny Eaton, Pablo Fanque, Sarah Forbes Bonetta, Samuel Coleridge-Taylor (19th century).

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Black-Tudors-Untold-Miranda-Kaufmann/dp/1786071843

https://www.historyextra.com/period/victorian/black-victorians-britons-famous-who/

Somerset v Stewart - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somerset_v_Stewart

Womanofcustard · Yesterday 19:55

In case not mentioned already, today a letter defending him has been sent, signed by, among others, Zack Polanski, John McDonnell and Clive Lewis.

Jane379 · Yesterday 19:58

noblegiraffe · Yesterday 19:43

The fuller quote isn't context that justifies the claim though.

Under a colorblind system that judged applicants only by academic qualifications, blacks would make up 0.7% of Harvard students. (Even that might be an overestimate, since high-school credentials are sometimes given a boost by affirmative action.) In a meritocracy, Harvard faculty would be recruited from the best of the best students, which means the number of black professors would approach 0%.

Why is the 'meritocracy' standard assumed to be academic success alone? The link shows that Harvard recruits based also on a six-point personal rating, a six-point athletics rating, and a six-point extracurricular one. Is a person who scores perfectly in exams but who is just hothoused with no outside interests who can't relate to other people better suited to being a Harvard student or professor? In his blog post he doesn't even mention the other criteria and leaves it to the reader to assume that the other ways of measuring the suitability of a Harvard candidate are merely 'woke' and not at all valid.

Blacks would disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment.

So he neatly segues from his assertion about a meritocracy at Harvard into a general assertion about all high profile positions, as if Harvard is a microcosm of society and as if extreme academic success ought to be the only requirement to attain any high profile position in a meritocracy (outside of sports and entertainment which I assume he begrudgingly admits require athleticism or performance skills more than good SATs). But that's clearly not true.

I mean, you're saying that the context makes it less racist, but imo it makes it not only racist, but also stupid. If this dildo were working in a meritocracy, he certainly wouldn't have any academic appointment, and not just because he is expressing difficult ideas, but because his arguments are terrible.

Yes, I've read Cofnas' Substack and it's not even as if he thinks very few or zero black people could reach the standard now but things could change in future (Ie. Environmental factors). He believes in the 'human biodiversity' theory (which asserts that black people evolved to be less intelligent as a group because Africa was a less challenging environment) .

Noodledog · Yesterday 20:15

DuchessDandelion · Yesterday 19:49

@LifeBeginsToday don't be discouraged, academia brims with the neurodivergent.

In my field I think non NDs are in the minority 😁

Temporal · Yesterday 20:16

DuchessDandelion · Yesterday 19:11

Your statements are objectively wrong, to pull out just two: there may not have been massive plantations, but there were black slaves in the UK and black people have been present in these lands throughout history.

There was some slavery here, but there were no appreciable numbers of blacks in the general UK population until after 1945. Many people had never even seen a black person, other than African American GIs and Caribbean troops stationed here during WW2.

SevenYellowHammers · Yesterday 20:20

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 19:44

I have heard it all now - a young black man has been set up. Absolutely unreal.

Just to clarify I mean he’s been conspired against.

SadSadTimes · Yesterday 20:29

SevenYellowHammers Ad a ND person he probably can repeat large swathes of text and this got mixed up with his own thoughts.

Oh, and the typos got mixed up with his own thoughts too? Give over

AInightingale · Yesterday 20:32

Talkinpeace · Yesterday 19:19

Friday night entertainment for the wonderful Mumsnet hive mind

https://x.com/GrumpyOW/status/2085743542291296679
Class photo time .... More details of which Sunday school he was chatty at ...

Also
When DID he buy his dreads
https://x.com/AjaTheEmpress/status/2085716564884562417

That's interesting - saw the same guy's first video yesterday and he has now named the school. And seems quite annoyed with Mr A, for good reason. Wonder if more classmates and acquaintances will now come forward.

DuchessDandelion · Yesterday 20:43

Temporal · Yesterday 20:16

There was some slavery here, but there were no appreciable numbers of blacks in the general UK population until after 1945. Many people had never even seen a black person, other than African American GIs and Caribbean troops stationed here during WW2.

Yes, I didn't argue that. What people don't realise is that black people both traded, visited and lived here throughout pre-modern history too. No one is saying they weren't a minority, but to deny their presence is inaccurate.

Noodledog · Yesterday 20:45

It's interesting because people with ND typically find it difficult to lie, whereas Arday seems to have based his entire career on it. The charming, manipulative grifter is also a very unusual presentation.

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 20:45

SevenYellowHammers · Yesterday 20:20

Just to clarify I mean he’s been conspired against.

By whom, exactly?

Sartre · Yesterday 20:46

Cambridge is too powerful to ever collapse. Not quite as mighty as Oxford but almost. I’m sure it will weather this storm.

I’m upset by the story because my DS is non verbal and I found his life story so inspiring. I’m now questioning everything about the guy and wondering whether he made his diagnosis up entirely.

Shedmistress · Yesterday 20:48

SevenYellowHammers · Yesterday 20:20

Just to clarify I mean he’s been conspired against.

What?

AInightingale · Yesterday 20:49

He's lied about everything else to do with his health, so it's looking likely. He may have had a diagnosis of ASD at some point but perhaps far, far more 'high functioning' than he claims.