Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The Jason Arday scandal

668 replies

Ilikesundays · 06/08/2026 21:55

To think that Cambridge University’s reputation has been shot to pieces by the revelations about ex-professor Jason Arday?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
EnidSpyton · Yesterday 14:16

noblegiraffe · Yesterday 13:23

And if he didn't train and qualify as a teacher, then what informed his PhD thesis about trainee PE teachers??

From what I have been able to find out, he has a degree in PE and Education or something along those lines, so he perhaps studied for a BA with QTS that used to be available for secondary school teachers (I think primary teachers can still train this way, but not secondary). That being said, he would still have presumably needed GCSEs or equivalent qualifications in Maths, English and Science to get QTS, as this is mandatory no matter your route into teaching and has been for years - I am a similar age to Arday, would have trained at around the same time as him, and a girl on my cohort had to study for a single Science GCSE alongside doing her PGCE in order to get QTS, as she had studied abroad and never gained an 'equivalent' Science qualification. So his claims of having only two GCSEs and being a qualified teacher don't wash. Both can't be true.

RoyalCorgi · Yesterday 14:16

Svelty · Yesterday 14:02

People wouldn’t have heard so much about it if he was an old white bloke. Probably wouldn’t be frothing about it on here anyway.

He wouldn't have got the job if he'd been an old white bloke.

Jane379 · Yesterday 14:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

He was a student not an academic. It was later revealed he had much lower grades than you'd usually expect to get in

nomas · Yesterday 14:19

GeneBelcher · Yesterday 14:06

"People wouldn’t have heard so much about it if he was an old white bloke. Probably wouldn’t be frothing about it on here anyway."

The old white bloke wouldn't have got the job in the first place - have you missed the point entirely? Or are you pretending?

edited to add that if said old bloke wore a dress and called himself Susan he may well have got the job- and we'd be "frothing" (god I hate that word) while noble folks like you fawned all over she/her

Edited

Most of those jobs are held by old white men though.

Noodledog · Yesterday 14:19

Gloriia · Yesterday 14:08

Oh how embarrassing.

What research did he do out of interest or was that made up too?

I've read some of his work that's been shared online. His "research" often seems to have literally consisted of asking a list of questions to a dozen or so friends of friends. And then reaching an obviously biased conclusion from them. I've honestly never read academic work of such poor quality (I have no experience of the social sciences though, maybe it's typical there 😁)

But the whole case has made me so cynical about parts of academia that when I saw the video clip of Hilary Cremin telling Arday that Cambridge were so lucky to have him because he was the best in his field, I just thought - maybe it's true, maybe everyone else is so appalling that he is the best in his field !

Orphlids · Yesterday 14:21

The real racism here is not the exposure of this man’s lies, but the motivation of the people who appointed him. Their failure to choose a person of colour who was genuinely qualified for the position suggests they didn’t believe such a person existed. His appointment seems like an insult to people of colour, because instead of selecting the very best, they’ve just accepted his claims without rigorous checks, and said, Yeah, he’ll do!” Did they not consider there was a better, more qualified candidate, who also came from a minority ethnic background?

Dontevenlookatme · Yesterday 14:23

beigeybeige · Yesterday 09:04

Lots to think about in this case. It’s very sad personally and institutionally.

Several worrying things about it are true at the same time as much as some people would like it to be a simple good vs evil tale. Arday is obviously a fantasist, but it’s also obviously the case that racism is at play.

Otherwise how could he be such a unicorn in the first place? He’s sounding like he’s been amplified in his over claiming by institutions for years. they have wanted to support these fantasies and have not spend the money and taken the time to do due diligence to check on things and that’s not OK either.

This kind of thing surely becomes inevitable when you make vast cuts to university budgets. Back office processes will get skipped. People change jobs a lot more as contracts are shortened and take home pay gets worse. Nobody wants to see the HR bill go up accordingly so things get skipped.

The risks of that worrying institutional behaviour way overshadows one person trying his luck as a chancer, yet the reporting of it is very skewed towards blaming Arday personally. Cambridge is just the most recent in a line of employers that haven’t checked claims. How many other less grandiose Ardays are there still there? This case rightly or wrongly is going to cause more burden on academics and institutions and back office processes because of this huge level of scrutiny the media have brought.

I also hate this media narrative of ‘everyone exaggerates their CV’ no I bloody don’t. I think a lot of women in fact women do the opposite. Underplay female achievement. So this will have a chilling effect on female promotion, which will be really depressing.

And I feel really sad for all the academics of colour who have struggled to get where they are now based on their merit and talents in a predominantly white academy, which will have been much much harder for them to do. They will feel singled out for skepticism of their appointments due to this case which is horrible.

I don’t know how you can fact check or challenge anyone’s claims of autism or if we should even try to do that ever… but I worry that the media presentation of autism as a big part of the picture when an individual has done something bad; will make other people feel autistic people are not genuine or autistic people are prone to lying about their achievements, or that people who say they’re autistic should not be believed, and they’re trying to make an excuse.

Not saying these are comparable acts at all but lately some prominent murderers or attackers have said they’re autistic when defending their case which I found really upsetting. The autistic people I know couldn’t countenance lying and in fact often get in trouble for being way too honest and direct, and obviously wouldn’t hurt a fly.

So this Arday case is confusing and upsetting because of what it uncovers. And I hope the one individual at the centre is OK because this is a lot. As well as all the other people hurt by this. As PP have said, there is a whole system of male over-promotion. Tale as old as time!

We don’t get this level of correction and interest normally so what is that saying about our employers and our society and its culture and value it places on individual or group achievement and/or barriers and struggle to achieve for individuals and groups?

I totally agree. This scandal has focused on one man. In reality the rot is deeper and more widespread.

An excellent post @beigeybeige👏👏

AnonyMumAuDHD · Yesterday 14:24

Svelty · Yesterday 14:02

People wouldn’t have heard so much about it if he was an old white bloke. Probably wouldn’t be frothing about it on here anyway.

Actually those of us with an interest in the perception, inclusion and advocacy for autistic/AuDHD/other NDs would absolutely be on here frothing. Couldn’t give a shit whether it was a white, black, hispanic or any ethnic origin. His main line of defence has been - but it was his autism; and his main line of attack is that we are picking on him because he is black.

Am pretty sure 99% of the posters here would be having the same issues with the lies, misrepresentation, the DEI benefits bestowed and lower standards expected if the only characteristics by which he had been elevated at the uni, lauded in the press and had leveraged his celebrity with, were a disadvantaged background and his remarkable (and increasingly questionable) claims of ND-based disability.

Angeruish · Yesterday 14:25

Jane379 · Yesterday 14:17

He was a student not an academic. It was later revealed he had much lower grades than you'd usually expect to get in

Indeed.

That guy, President of the Oxford Union no less, had some pretty impressive dreadlocks, but nothing in comparison to the former professor.

On the subject of Jasons, perhaps like the Dothraki ruled by Khal Drago (Jason Mamoa's character in Game of Thrones) he will feel compelled to cut them now he's been taken down.

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 14:25

Noodledog · Yesterday 14:19

I've read some of his work that's been shared online. His "research" often seems to have literally consisted of asking a list of questions to a dozen or so friends of friends. And then reaching an obviously biased conclusion from them. I've honestly never read academic work of such poor quality (I have no experience of the social sciences though, maybe it's typical there 😁)

But the whole case has made me so cynical about parts of academia that when I saw the video clip of Hilary Cremin telling Arday that Cambridge were so lucky to have him because he was the best in his field, I just thought - maybe it's true, maybe everyone else is so appalling that he is the best in his field !

Was that the clip where she was holding his hand? This fawning and condescending is so detrimental to black academics' achievements. Inviting disproportionate attention to Arday sums up the failure of DEI, because it's not being run properly.

Jane379 · Yesterday 14:25

Iwantanothergo · Yesterday 09:54

I have no idea what his A-level grades were, and neither do you.

I think he put them on his LinkedIn, if I recall correctly he had ABB while his course offer is AAA usually.

Manxexile · Yesterday 14:26

FullOfLemons · Yesterday 09:11

I doubt its reputation in disciplines such as natural sciences, law or English has been impacted.

It probably makes no difference to those who work in or are interested in Jason Arday’s field.

I suspect you are right that its reputation in "proper" disciplines such as natural sciences and law will not be affected as I suspect those Faculties and academics who follow them do not have much time for "weak" subjects such as the sociology of education.

I suspect you are also right that students and academics who are involved in the sociology of education won't see what the problem is - although they might be well advised to consider it a learning opportunity.

Perhaps the Head of Faculty might want to expand their research interests to cover it - what is peace with the planet or peace with non human species?

Hilary Cremin | Faculty of Education

Hilary Cremin | Faculty of Education

https://faculty.educ.cam.ac.uk/people/staff/cremin#

Manxexile · Yesterday 14:28

AChunkOfPurestGreenMilady · Yesterday 09:09

If he was a middle-aged white bloke from a provincial university who was found to have skimpt on his citations and juiced up his cv absolutely no-one in the wider world would give a monkey's, and there certainly wouldn't be a big fuss in the media when he resigned.
That said, Trinity should have looked harder at his credentials - this is an absolute open goal for the diversity critics.

A middle aged white bloke in that situation would not have been appointed in the first place.

that's the whole point...

tramtracks · Yesterday 14:28

DuchessDandelion · Yesterday 11:58

You might well be right but I'm mindful that a lack of holistic response/rebuttal from either Cambridge or Jason himself has left a vacuum which allows this discourse to grow unchecked.

It is unlikely that every claim is without foundation - I certainly hope his story hasn't been completely fabricated, but while there continues to be a failure to accurately clarify the points raised, the result is one of total reputational collapse.

The fact that journalists haven't been able to verify the claims is damning, but given that the person in question is autistic and that autistic people are at much higher risk of suicide, as are black men, I hope there are people looking out for Jason's wellbeing right now.

Social media, the tabloids and populism easily generate witch hunts and of their many failings in this case, Cambridge have massively failed in their duty of care.

Edited

I think if he had resigned much much earlier instead of doubling down and liaising with the goodlawproject etc then it would have died down much more quickly. Cambridge should had, as a mimimum, checked all of his credentials asap and when they were found wanting, suspended him quickly. They and he had to be dragged kicking and screaming into a resignation. Not a good look for the uni whatsoever.

beigeybeige · Yesterday 14:29

HollyhocksandPeons · Yesterday 14:01

Don't let's be silly! We all know the difference between real sciences and 'social sciences'. Cambridge reputation is intact as far as real sciences are concerned, and that is what Cambridge is all about.

CAmbridge is definitely not just about sciences. And what a silly comment about the social sciences. Most people understand that the world needs to understand people, culture, society.
and for example- to those posting in glass houses- Theres loads that is sorely wanting about scientific practice and culture for example, that could be studied helpfully to inform policy and regulation

Its really foolish to dismiss the social sciences- yes there’s a scandal here but we need these subjects.

nomas · Yesterday 14:30

Noodledog · Yesterday 14:19

I've read some of his work that's been shared online. His "research" often seems to have literally consisted of asking a list of questions to a dozen or so friends of friends. And then reaching an obviously biased conclusion from them. I've honestly never read academic work of such poor quality (I have no experience of the social sciences though, maybe it's typical there 😁)

But the whole case has made me so cynical about parts of academia that when I saw the video clip of Hilary Cremin telling Arday that Cambridge were so lucky to have him because he was the best in his field, I just thought - maybe it's true, maybe everyone else is so appalling that he is the best in his field !

I agree on the reputation of academia, but for me it predates Arday.

I’ve recently started structured learning after many years and the lack of regulation on the use of AI has been eye opening.

InterestedDad37 · Yesterday 14:30

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · Yesterday 14:06

Must say I’m sparing just a thought this morning for Professor Hilary Cremin, head of the faculty of education at Cambridge, who is reported on the front page of today’s Times - and I dare say in other papers - as having told Jason Arday, ‘We are so lucky to have you. You are the best in the world in terms of the research that you do.’ 😮

Yes, I saw an old BBC clip from around the time of his appointment. She was embarrassingly gushing in her praise of him ("you're the best in the world in your field of research") and the committee's enthusiasm to employ him.

But we shouldn't feel sorry for her either. Her work is, quite rightly, also up for scrutiny. This acceptance was part of her work.

TheGander · Yesterday 14:31

Hopefully the groupthink and wilful blindness that resulted in this man being given tenure will be questioned and discarded. It was a load of wishful thinking that elevated this man via a now literally unbelievable back story, into something he actually isn’t. Out simply, he never had the intellectual chops for the position and it’s now glaringly obvious.

Temporal · Yesterday 14:33

Jason Arday didn't lose his job because of racism; he got the job in the first place due to racism.

Seeingadistance · Yesterday 14:33

PinkFrogss · Yesterday 13:15

Why do you think I am Jason?

I simply said I don’t understand why this is getting so much media attention compared to some other cases. Which tbh I still don’t but clearly it has piqued people’s interests so fair enough to them.

But other misconduct cases don’t get as much media attention. I haven’t even defended the guy

It's getting so much attention because as a previous poster has pointed out, he has made claims about himself that are so wild, so numerous and so far-fetched that any reasonable toddler would have been suspicious!

So, it's about his claims and also, and increasingly, about the people in power and authority who not only accepted all of this nonsense, but also promoted, rewarded and lauded him for it!

Shedmistress · Yesterday 14:36

LuckyHazelFox · Yesterday 14:25

Was that the clip where she was holding his hand? This fawning and condescending is so detrimental to black academics' achievements. Inviting disproportionate attention to Arday sums up the failure of DEI, because it's not being run properly.

Like Drew Barrymore kneeling in front of Dylan Mulvaney eh?

Manxexile · Yesterday 14:38

13RidgmontRoad · Yesterday 09:26

The greatest impact will be felt by legitimate autistic and minority ethnic academics. And Arday wasn’t even smart enough or interested enough to reflect on that. What a pillock.

It is ironic that his PhD thesis was based at least in part on on the benefits of reflective practice

Huskysledging · Yesterday 14:39

nomas · 06/08/2026 22:00

No way. Cambridge is too big to be rocked by one guy.

Maybe but Cambridge in a large hole with the Vet School and other things even going so far as to saying it might be shut down (2025) they have now u turned on this and say they remain committed to turning the department around (2026) but I sign post you to this
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2024/nov/27/cambridge-university-veterinary-course-lose-accreditation-ethical-concerns?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

The vet school at Cambridge failed 50 / 77 accreditations in 2024 / putting animals down without a good enough reason, racism and improper disposal of clinical waste we just a few reasons why it failed. Meaning all vet students were not accredited vets upon graduation.

Thank god my daughter turned down her place and went somewhere else!

Cambridge University veterinary course could lose accreditation over ‘ethical concerns’

Worries about animal euthanasia and mishandling of complaints from students about racism among concerns

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2024/nov/27/cambridge-university-veterinary-course-lose-accreditation-ethical-concerns?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Shedmistress · Yesterday 14:47

Manxexile · Yesterday 14:38

It is ironic that his PhD thesis was based at least in part on on the benefits of reflective practice

He couldnt even resign without AI writing his letter.

The whole thing from start to finish is a clusterfuck. Shows them all up as gullible twats.

tramtracks · Yesterday 14:50

For anyone dealing with stats - here's link to Cambridge admissions 2023-2025

www.undergraduate.study.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2026-05/ug_admissions_statistics_2025_cycle.pdf