Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Letting newborn cry for a little while - dealing with other children?

179 replies

JulMay6 · 05/08/2026 17:07

I have a beautiful 1 month old DD who I adore but (like most babies) she likes to be held and is in her cluster feeding phase. I am seriously struggling mentally with keeping up with her cues and needs whilst looking after my 3 year old DS who also is clingy and likes to be with me and needs my attention.

Although I do have her in the carrier sometimes, I can’t do this all day plus we are in a heatwave.

I have read it is absolutely OK to leave a newborn to cry for 5-10 mins as long as they are in a safe space. I honestly feel like if I did this a few times a day it would save my mentally. Hearing her cry breaks my heart but I’m finding things difficult

OP posts:
Blueseudeshoes · 06/08/2026 08:36

A couple of minutes is fine, not ten minutes though that’s abit much in my opinion! I’ve been there myself I have 3 children and sometimes it can’t be avoided

GreenChameleon · 06/08/2026 08:31

MumTumForReal · 05/08/2026 20:25

My 3 year old (twice over) did too, but surely sometimes you had to leave the baby to, for example:

  • Use the toilet.
  • Assist older child toileting (or change nappy if your 2yo was still in nappies).
  • Clean up/bath/shower older child.
  • Attend to older child when they were unwell - which happened pretty frequently to my kids as preschoolers. They would often need their temperatures taking, medication given, comfort, sick cleaning up, etc.
  • Help older child with bits of dressing.
  • Brush older children's teeth.
  • Put elder children to bed with a cuddle.

I'm sure there were loads of other things too.

Agree. I can think of many situations where I didn't have a choice, the baby had to wait while I tended to my other children. There are situations where the older siblings have to come first, it's the reality of having more than one child. And that's nothing to feel bad about, because a baby isn't permanently traumatised by crying for ten minutes if its needs are ultimately attended to!

Parker231 · 06/08/2026 08:26

Mooselander · 05/08/2026 20:47

Oh bless. You’ve convinced yourself you’re unhygienic if you don’t shower daily 🤣

I breastfed two children continuously for 5 years. A shower everyday was never necessary 🤣

I have a shower every day - more than one if I’ve been for a run or to the gym - why - because I want to - new baby or not - a shower was a part of my morning routine.

Cherrytree86 · 06/08/2026 08:21

Mooselander · 05/08/2026 20:33

Firstly, you didn’t have to shower every day, and secondly, surely you had a partner doing his fair share?

@Mooselander

of course she had to shower daily! Even prisoners are able to shower daily. It’s basic personal hygiene.

MrsMuggin · 06/08/2026 07:54

I think its fine, and inevitable that baby will be left to cry for a few minutes at times. I did co-sleep, extended breastfeeding etc, but you can't instantly attend every need of both children 24/7.
A great tip I got given which I haven't seen mentioned is, whenever you do have to let baby cry for a few minutes is to call "sorry baby you'll have to wait as older child needs me first". Baby hasn't got a clue what you're saying, but it reassures the older child (who will regularly be told to wait while you look after baby) that they are equal ranking to baby with you.

Crumpetring · 06/08/2026 07:38

Mooselander · 05/08/2026 20:47

Oh bless. You’ve convinced yourself you’re unhygienic if you don’t shower daily 🤣

I breastfed two children continuously for 5 years. A shower everyday was never necessary 🤣

When I had a very little baby I was also pumping milk for the local NICU milk bank. Part of their protocol was that the breast were washed with soapy water every day.

Before that I was showering to keep stitches clean along side all the post baby bleeding.

I’d say both of the above were times when a daily shower was necessary.

My children aren’t babies now and I absolutely don’t shower every day but I don’t feel the need to belittle people who do.

gamerchick · 06/08/2026 00:41

AgentPidge · 05/08/2026 21:02

If you look back at how our distant ancestors parented, and how non- Westernised tribes in eg the Brazilian rainforest parent today, you will find that they keep their babies close all the time and the babies' needs are met immediately and they rarely cry. Their older children learn to be independent a lot earlier than ours do. It's instinctive parenting. What you're talking about makes us put aside our instincts. I recommend reading The Continuum Concept rather than Gina Ford.

I don't really think we have to worry about wild animals bigger than us taking our babies away to eat.

SouthLondonMum22 · 05/08/2026 23:26

Timeforachange26 · 05/08/2026 21:08

But yet the current generation don't let the older kids be more ndependent, at least in the western world. So that's just picking one bit on ancestors habits

So if it's the " right" way for babies then why isn't it the right way for older kids to be more independent??

I'm no fan of gina Ford as I think it's even more bloody restricted to parents lives as well ( id go insane being so bound to a routine) but I do know people who used it and their kids grew up fine

I read Gina Ford's book and found it more useful that some of the more modern ones but I love routine and I feel like it's made me a better parent.

But that's exactly why parents need to do what they feel is best because different things will work for different people.

SouthLondonMum22 · 05/08/2026 23:20

Mooselander · 05/08/2026 20:33

Firstly, you didn’t have to shower every day, and secondly, surely you had a partner doing his fair share?

God forbid a mother shower daily. How dare she.

EconomyClassRockstar · 05/08/2026 23:16

You have my absolute sympathy OP. Those first few weeks going from one to two can be really hard because a lot of the things you learned with No1 don't always translate when you have 2. But, trust me, the baby will be absolutely fine if they have to cry it out a few minutes long term because they have the most crucial part, a Mum who really cares. You've got this!

JennyChawleigh · 05/08/2026 22:31

I had one of those womb music tapes for my 3rd and it was a godsend.. He'd lie in the pram awake but content while I got the other 2 ready for school.

SP2024 · 05/08/2026 22:13

I think a few minutes is fine and necessary sometimes. Also a difference between leaving them alone in a room to cry and having them in a bouncer/on the floor where they can still see you and you can speak to them. I’d never have had a shower if I didn’t let mine cry sometimes

C8H10N4O2 · 05/08/2026 22:05

JulMay6 · 05/08/2026 18:46

Thank you. My son absolutely hated his carrier too! It’s also overwhelming when they are attached to you constantly too, I know I’ll get told off for saying that but when my toddler is having a tantrum and baby is crying whilst strapped to me in the 30 degrees heat , my head spins

My eldest also hated the sling and was a non stop cryer when put down. I disagree entirely that its damaging to a new baby to wait a few minutes but not damaging to a 2 year old, only just starting to gain a sense of “other” to be told they have to wait constantly when you have a crying baby. Its a great recipe for creating resentment. If you have twins, as PP say - which baby do you expect to learn they are not the only one?

My newest DGC was born just before this heatwave started and is apparently the reincarnation of my first born. Honestly my heart goes out to you - do what you need to survive and keep all of you going until the weather breaks. In another week or two you will hit the 6 week mark which tends to be a point of improvement.
Your DC have a mother sufficiently concerned about doing the best for them that she is willing to brave AIBU at a difficult time - they have already won the life lottery.

Illbethereinaminute · 05/08/2026 22:05

I remember a time when child #1 was a baby and I was in the car stuck in traffic with him wailing because he was hungry. There was nothing I could do until I got to the supermarket further down the road, I couldn't stop, I couldn't touch him because I was driving so just had to try talk to him.

It felt like forever but can't have been more than 5 minutes really.

Yes it was horrible for him and for me but sometimes there is no alternative, it is what it is. There are times when a baby just has to wait, you could be having a really difficult poo!!

Incidentally my firstborn hated all carriers and being held with a passion, I could never snuggle him after a feed, he would squirm and be desperate to be free. The youngest was happy to be carried/snuggled but now they are 9 and 11 it's child #1 that wants the contact and child #2 isn't all that bothered.

batt3nb3rg · 05/08/2026 21:55

Peonies12 · 05/08/2026 20:44

Gina Ford is cruel. We are mammals, it’s natural to have our babies physically attached to us.

I think you might be thinking of marsupials. We absolutely are mammals, and it's actually not at all common for mammal babies to be exclusively carried by their mothers for extended periods. Monkeys are frequently seen to be carrying their babies, most notably while travelling, which is an entirely separate situation than just lounging around with your baby suctioned onto you.

Abra1t · 05/08/2026 21:42

Pretty well every single person currently alive on the planet would have cried for a few minutes as an infant occasionally.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 05/08/2026 21:34

Minasama · 05/08/2026 17:26

I would read Gina Ford and base your thoughts on that. There’s a lot of emphasis on putting them down to sleep which worked well with my two. A good routine means they don’t cry that much because they are fed and have had enough sleep, if they do cry it will indicate reflux which you can sort out separately.

There is no need to keep them in a carrier all day, we aren’t chimpanzees or kangaroos! That is just the weirdest thing that has come in since I had my kids and makes your life much harder than it needs to be. Not a problem if that’s what you want to do but from your post it sounds as if you may not. Generations of us didn’t and our kids are fine!!

Edited

I know lots of grandparents who advocate Gina Ford and say that all their kids turned out fine.

I also know their kids, and know that they are absolutely not "just fine"! That's just one of those phrases all older generations use to justify what they did. It doesn't mean anything.

Leaving your baby for a couple of minutes is ok, but let's not go down the route of pretending GF was all fine and dandy.

FattyMallow · 05/08/2026 21:27

You're doing everything correctly! You don't need to explain yourself to anyone. Up to 6 months she'll be like that because she's adjusting to everthing new. Make sure she's dry, feed, burped and leave her in her safe cot. Btw, you'll know what cry is a real danger and which one is just "carry me around I love your smell" and when you leave her to cope with her "I'm bored" cry she'll grow up as an incredibly independent,strong and intelligent child.

Timeforachange26 · 05/08/2026 21:08

AgentPidge · 05/08/2026 21:02

If you look back at how our distant ancestors parented, and how non- Westernised tribes in eg the Brazilian rainforest parent today, you will find that they keep their babies close all the time and the babies' needs are met immediately and they rarely cry. Their older children learn to be independent a lot earlier than ours do. It's instinctive parenting. What you're talking about makes us put aside our instincts. I recommend reading The Continuum Concept rather than Gina Ford.

But yet the current generation don't let the older kids be more ndependent, at least in the western world. So that's just picking one bit on ancestors habits

So if it's the " right" way for babies then why isn't it the right way for older kids to be more independent??

I'm no fan of gina Ford as I think it's even more bloody restricted to parents lives as well ( id go insane being so bound to a routine) but I do know people who used it and their kids grew up fine

lifehappens12 · 05/08/2026 21:06

When I had two at a similar age I used to work out who could settle first? So if the toddler needed a couple of minutes to help/get snack etc while baby needed a feed (40 min etc). I would let the baby cry while sorting out the toddler then I could feed the baby.

its tough when there are two small people and you have to choose. You won’t be able to make both happy all of the time. There will be times when they both cry and then you cry too. Once I accepted that I had to choose - I cried a lot less. Plus it will get easier!

AgentPidge · 05/08/2026 21:02

Minasama · 05/08/2026 17:26

I would read Gina Ford and base your thoughts on that. There’s a lot of emphasis on putting them down to sleep which worked well with my two. A good routine means they don’t cry that much because they are fed and have had enough sleep, if they do cry it will indicate reflux which you can sort out separately.

There is no need to keep them in a carrier all day, we aren’t chimpanzees or kangaroos! That is just the weirdest thing that has come in since I had my kids and makes your life much harder than it needs to be. Not a problem if that’s what you want to do but from your post it sounds as if you may not. Generations of us didn’t and our kids are fine!!

Edited

If you look back at how our distant ancestors parented, and how non- Westernised tribes in eg the Brazilian rainforest parent today, you will find that they keep their babies close all the time and the babies' needs are met immediately and they rarely cry. Their older children learn to be independent a lot earlier than ours do. It's instinctive parenting. What you're talking about makes us put aside our instincts. I recommend reading The Continuum Concept rather than Gina Ford.

gamerchick · 05/08/2026 20:52

Sleepytimepleaseee · 05/08/2026 20:11

Are you being sarcastic?
Because yes, it's their only way of communicating and also yes, it's not the same as me crying for ten mins. I can rationalise my situation - a tiny baby left to cry only experiences overwhelming panic.

You are aware that babies cry to block.out the world as well aren't you? Not all crying is distress.

Some of these posts are nuts. Get a grip.

ObsidianTree · 05/08/2026 20:51

When my daughter was newborn there would be this time early evening where she just wanted to breastfeed constantly for hours. it wasn't possible when I had to cook dinner for my 5 year old son. So I had to put her in the bouncer while cooking in kitchen. She could see me so wasn't like I was leaving her alone. But sometimes it's just not possible to hold your baby all the time. Especially if you have other children that have needs that need to be met also. Shes perfectly fine! A little crying hasn't damaged her!

Your baby will be fine being left to crying for a few minutes.

MyEasterBonnet · 05/08/2026 20:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Of course people shower every day, even when they’re not dealing with babies throwing up milk, shitty nappies and breastfeeding. It’s absolutely not selfish to allow yourself a few minutes of self care. The baby is safe and can cope with being alone for a few minutes without anything terrible happening.

Mooselander · 05/08/2026 20:47

Hankunamatata · 05/08/2026 20:45

Give over

Dh worked away for long periods

And yes shower daily as I have basic levels of hygiene while breastfeeding.

Oh bless. You’ve convinced yourself you’re unhygienic if you don’t shower daily 🤣

I breastfed two children continuously for 5 years. A shower everyday was never necessary 🤣

Swipe left for the next trending thread