Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Non-binary colleague using disabled toilet

1000 replies

DefendingPan · 22/12/2024 10:14

Where I work there’s employee male and female toilets, customer male and female toilets and one customer disabled toilet.

This colleague is non-binary, is not disabled, and uses the disabled toilet/ baby change (with their own Radar key) because they “don’t feel comfortable) using either the male or female toilets.

I mentioned to my boss that I didn’t think this was appropriate and got accused of transphobia and threatened with discipline. I was made to feel like I was being offensive and discriminatory for bringing it up.

We have many elderly customers and many young families who all also need to use it.

Was I being unreasonable?

OP posts:
RanchRat · 22/12/2024 12:07

I think you need to stop watching people go to the toilet.

ploffer789 · 22/12/2024 12:07

just let people use toilets. if there was a genuine issue specific to this situation that arose this could have been brought up then, but this was purely based on hypotheticals (and potentially transphobia). take this an an opportunity to become more empathetic and learn about different identities :) we all have a lot to learn here it would seem

WarmingClothesontheRadiator · 22/12/2024 12:07

MrsSkylerWhite · 22/12/2024 11:59

Many people have hidden disabilities that they would rather not disclose to all and sundry. Your colleague may be one of them. Would you be so outraged if this person was heterosexual?

What has their sexuality to do with this?

JoyousTern · 22/12/2024 12:08

Petty of you.

frenchnoodle · 22/12/2024 12:08

FourEyesGood · 22/12/2024 10:18

Until there is a unisex toilet or one dedicated to those who are non-binary, there is nowhere else for this person to go.

Really, how does it affect you? It’s not as if they’re in there all day, is it? (If they are, that’s a bigger issue.)

This person has a sex ...

Mrswhatsit40 · 22/12/2024 12:08

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 22/12/2024 12:02

Love that those who understand basic biology and know that humans can't change sex, and that people don't have to subscribe to an ideology they don't believe in - if they don't want to (like religion) are labelled the 'GC brigade' 🤣. Love it.

I know - I'm usually a bit of an oddity though so it's funny to be part of a club that I'm pretty sure includes 99% of the population. And just don't realise they're part of it!

Had to explain what gender critical meant to a couple of friends recently and their expressions were like "errr....well, yeah? Don't most people know that?"

LostInTheMoonlight · 22/12/2024 12:08

FourEyesGood · 22/12/2024 10:18

Until there is a unisex toilet or one dedicated to those who are non-binary, there is nowhere else for this person to go.

Really, how does it affect you? It’s not as if they’re in there all day, is it? (If they are, that’s a bigger issue.)

They can use the one for their sex so there is somewhere for them to go.

NotBadConsidering · 22/12/2024 12:09

WarmingClothesontheRadiator · 22/12/2024 12:04

Gender ideology enforces this as does the idea of ‘non-binary’ that suggests they are somehow special but everyone else must conform to binary gendered expectations.

Exactly. The only people who are enforcing rigid gender expectations are those who want to be defined by not fitting them or fitting the opposite of sexist stereotypes.

A non-binary person says “I don’t want to be defined by either the masculine or feminine roles of our society.”

The world says “no one is saying you have to be🤨, the rest of us aren’t.”

The non-binary person says “But, but, but…I need those stereotypes so I can’t not be them and be different.”

It’s regressive nonsense.

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:09

@IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle I literally used Crohn's as the example in my reply to you??? I have multiple good friends with the condition (some with stomas and some without) who need to use the disabled toilet. Also have friends with UC. I myself have intestinal failure among my other conditions which can cause some overlapping issues and has some similar treatment pathways. So believe me, I am very far from unfamiliar with this category.

I think the issue is that I view all chronic illness as falling within the general spectrum of "valid disability" and you see "disability" as a negative label which you want to reject. I don't think anything I said merited your extreme rudeness, frankly. We just have very different takes on disability as a concept.

WigglyVonWaggly · 22/12/2024 12:09

As much as I used to fully support people with gender dysphoria using the toilet they felt most comfortable with, the absolute piss taking from some men now that they can just walk in has made me seriously resent this expectation that we’ll now take in all of the perverts, flashers, camera hiders and gynophiles without questions.

For that reason, I’d be glad to have someone genuinely minding their own business by using a unisex space and quietly getting on with things. So yes, I’d support your colleague.

Better than seeing a man’s arse while he stands up pissing with the cubicle door open which is what I saw in the ladies’ a few months ago.

DaphneduMaureen · 22/12/2024 12:09

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:03

@DaphneduMaureen it's not your right because you're not disabled 👍 Keep abusing others' provisions! The fact you're defending it in such an awful way shows that at some level you do know how wrong your behaviour is.

I am not registered disabled but have a very real, physical reason for why an accessible toilet is more suitable for me. I don’t owe you an explanation, and thankfully, you’re not the keeper of all the accessible toilets in the land. Teehee

MrsSkylerWhite · 22/12/2024 12:09

WarmingClothesontheRadiator · Today 12:07

MrsSkylerWhite · Today 11:59
Many people have hidden disabilities that they would rather not disclose to all and sundry. Your colleague may be one of them. Would you be so outraged if this person was heterosexual?

What has their sexuality to do with this?

Absolutely nothing. OP highlighted it in her first post, describing her colleague as non binary.
Best ask OP what sexuality has to do with it.

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:10

ploffer789 · 22/12/2024 12:07

just let people use toilets. if there was a genuine issue specific to this situation that arose this could have been brought up then, but this was purely based on hypotheticals (and potentially transphobia). take this an an opportunity to become more empathetic and learn about different identities :) we all have a lot to learn here it would seem

This toilet is for disabled people. It's simple.

ChallahPlaiter · 22/12/2024 12:10

NotBadConsidering · 22/12/2024 12:00

Cross post. You haven’t defined it. You say it’s existed for ages, but in that extremely long time no one has come up with a definition?

Proof it’s nonsense.

I’ve just addressed this.
As I’ve said, I’m not taking a stance nor claiming to have all the answers. I just think it’s a complex and interesting issue and it’s a shame to try and sum it up in a sentence or two, or close off discussion by saying that gender identity is nonsense or purely an artificial construct.

Actually I think I’ve said all I want to now!

MrsSkylerWhite · 22/12/2024 12:10

Sorry, highlighted wrong bit. You get the gist.

frenchnoodle · 22/12/2024 12:10

There is no such thing as being "registered disabled"

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 22/12/2024 12:10

Disabled toilets are supposed to be for people who are physically disabled, aren’t they? Or who have medical conditions that mean they can’t wait?

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:10

@DaphneduMaureen If you had a disability you would know there is no such thing as "registered disabled". That is wildly offensive and archaic terminology. Your ableism is peeking out again!

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:11

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 22/12/2024 12:10

Disabled toilets are supposed to be for people who are physically disabled, aren’t they? Or who have medical conditions that mean they can’t wait?

Yes. Thank you.

Baileysfeverdream · 22/12/2024 12:11

I agree with the OP - people with mobility impairments and other disabilities need specially adapted toilets - they're adapted for a reason.

I have an autoimmune condition and sometimes need to use a walking stick, and need to use a grip bar to liftt myself off the seat, so I need the disabled toilet when I have a flare.

The disabled toilet where I work changed to 'universal access' this year, so anyone who doesn't want to use the womens or mens toilets can use it. I think it's wrong that this was done, it downgrades the needs of disabled people for an accessible toilet, equating them to people who don't want to use the gender based loos, but don't need the modifications.

In an ideal world there would simply be more toilets for different types of user, but for now, disabled people are suffering from loss of facilities - how is this fair?

happydappy2 · 22/12/2024 12:11

Identifying as non binary does not make a person disabled, therefore they should not use disabled toilets. It's really that simple!

IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle · 22/12/2024 12:12

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:09

@IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle I literally used Crohn's as the example in my reply to you??? I have multiple good friends with the condition (some with stomas and some without) who need to use the disabled toilet. Also have friends with UC. I myself have intestinal failure among my other conditions which can cause some overlapping issues and has some similar treatment pathways. So believe me, I am very far from unfamiliar with this category.

I think the issue is that I view all chronic illness as falling within the general spectrum of "valid disability" and you see "disability" as a negative label which you want to reject. I don't think anything I said merited your extreme rudeness, frankly. We just have very different takes on disability as a concept.

I'm not going to apoligise to some one who thinks I'm only permitted to use the accessible toilet if I say I'm disabled.

Oh and your attitude and the attitudes of other posters banging on about "disabled" toilets only being for the disabled isn't at all helpful for people like me who have no obvious physical issues.

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:12

ACynicalDad · 22/12/2024 12:06

I think it's the best place for them - are you disabled and unable to use the 'right' one for you? If someone in the workplace has a condition that means they have to use the disabled loo and can't hold it then I'd complain, if it's barely/not used that YABU.

It's also the customer toilet. This colleague is not disabled. Disabled toilets are for disabled people, it's really quite simple.

Bromptotoo · 22/12/2024 12:12

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:04

@Bromptotoo Sunflower lanyards are a literal laughing stock nowadays and seriously disabled people are encouraged not to wear them because of that.

I am well aware of invisible disability and that can be a valid reason sometimes to use a disabled toilet (eg Crohns). I don't question that at all. That doesn't mean a fleeting sense of discomfort is a disability.

You've no idea whether it's fleeting or not or how it affects the person concerned.

My Father had an anxiety issue that meant under some circumstances he could not release his bladder sphincter. He couldn't use a urinal in the gents and struggled in the cubicles. Nothing to do with sex/gender.

A Radar key and a place to himself would have helped.

verysmellyjelly · 22/12/2024 12:13

@IHaveNeverLivedintheCastle Believe me, based on your conduct I was expecting no apology. It must be terrifying to have to speak to a disgusting Disabled Person! Don't worry, you won't catch anything from me over the internet.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.