Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread gallery
11
DiscontentedPig · 15/10/2024 09:10

LivelyMauveHedgehog · 15/10/2024 08:11

Can you clarify what you mean by opening a floodgate?

Fat people masquerading as thin people, presumably.

Geranen · 15/10/2024 09:10

MillyMollyMandHey · 15/10/2024 08:12

Wish you could opt out of your taxes paying for things like this.

I wish I could opt my taxes out of the health care available to narrow-minded people like you, and the education of their children.

StMarieforme · 15/10/2024 09:10

Cerialkiller · 15/10/2024 08:16

Wow. I'm staggered at how fast this trail haa been implemented. Usually these things take so long to respond to medical tech changes. I think it can only be a good thing. It will establish the effectiveness of the drug for a number of purposes. I one who thinks they could be an amazing benefit and more research is good. I forsee being able to get the drug in multiple forms (pills, implants etc) within a few years.

So this largely unrest in non diabetics being rolled out quickly is a good thing?!
At least they may have health monitoring, unlike the people lying online to get it.

Apolloneuro · 15/10/2024 09:11

TopshopCropTop · 15/10/2024 09:07

The only person responsible for someone being fat is that individual but now all of a sudden it’s a state responsibility to make them not fat. It makes absolutely no sense. People need to take personal responsibility for their own actions.

That’s fine as long as you extrapolate this theory to people who break their legs skiing or playing rugby or choose to live near a busy road and get respiratory problems.

TopshopCropTop · 15/10/2024 09:11

Geranen · 15/10/2024 09:10

I wish I could opt my taxes out of the health care available to narrow-minded people like you, and the education of their children.

It’s not being narrow minded though is it. Are the obese people considering the cost of their obesity to the NHS? No, so why should everybody else be taking consideration and responsibility for it.

User37482 · 15/10/2024 09:11

I think if people want to access work but can’t because their weight gives them health complications but they are stuck because they aren’t in work so have limited means to obtain healthy food (cost, mobility issues walking to the shops or whatever, self esteem problems) then go for it.

It may help break a cycle for some people to live better more fulfilling lives.

NerdWhoEatsMedlar · 15/10/2024 09:11

Semaglutide is a fecking wonder drug, for some people. It is fairly useless for others. The average weight loss over about a year is 6.5kg, not that impressive. Obesity is complex, one solution does not suit all.

Ethically is this just a way to do a large scale trial reasonably cheaply?

Cheesecakecookie · 15/10/2024 09:11

soupfiend · 15/10/2024 09:05

We are obese because we eat so much, it really is as simple as that

Some people naturally have no off switch
Some people have developed a massive appetite
Foods make us crave more food and therefore overeat

But the bottom line is we eat too much as a society, its easy, its cheap, its plentiful, its accessible, its socially acceptable, its 'fun', its expected

The medication supports that you eat less. You have to eat less to lose weight, so yes they are 'working' to eat less and therefore will be successful

Its not the same as antibiotics silently treating a condition, you have to eat less. LIke if you have physical intervention for drugs, fags or booze, you have to stop using those in order for the treatment to be considered a success

No doubt you wouldnt be po faced about someone stopping the fags would you, you would say 'well done on giving up' even if they had patches and other help

Or perhaps you wouldnt

Someone upthread actually did suggest these drugs are similar to nicotine patches and anti smoking medicine. I thought that was an excellent analogy.

You are ofcourse still working - but it is much much less effort. Thats the point - the medication makes it easier.

Again they help people quit individually (but once off them many went back to smoking)

but things did not change as a society until we started to really target smoking - and it took years. Initially it was banned indoors. Warnings and changed to types of cigarettes that could be legally sold so as to not encourage smoking.

Lots of gruesome warnings on packets. Then cigarettes had to be behind a screen in the store.

What wasn’t forseen was the popularity of vapes and these were not regulated and allowed to replace cigarettes.

So while smoking is much much less common now a lot of people still vape.

We need to take a similar approach to obesity and medicine is only a small part of that.

soupfiend · 15/10/2024 09:12

allaboutthat · 15/10/2024 09:07

@soupfiend I know you seem determined for us all to agree with you though it's unclear why it matters so much to you.
Yes I absolutely do also wonder (not worry) the same for those given gym and/or slimming world memberships as well. Not because I grudge them it at all. Just because it seems to be a sticking plaster rather than a long term helpful lifestyle change. Whether we like it or not, no the injections have not been used for weight loss for long enough that any of us can say there won't be negative long term effects. Regardless of our personal feelings on it either way.

I couldnt care less if people agree with me or not, it makes no difference to my life, what are you talking about

This is another goady fat bashing thread and people are talking utter bullshit. Including you. You're not worried about peoples MH if they have been referred to slimming world and then it doesnt work out for them! What rubbish, well done for all the tropes, 'MH', 'sticking plaster' 'dont know enough about the long term effects' 'lifestyle changes'

Just like you're not concerned about peoples MH if the jabs dont work or they put weight back on, its just fat bashing, or weight loss bashing actually

PandoraSox · 15/10/2024 09:12

itwasnevermine · 15/10/2024 09:07

Nobody will sell it ffs.

I genuinely do not understand the pure hatred towards fat people on this site

Fat people + benefit claimants = lots of poisonous frothing on MN, it seems.

TopshopCropTop · 15/10/2024 09:12

Apolloneuro · 15/10/2024 09:11

That’s fine as long as you extrapolate this theory to people who break their legs skiing or playing rugby or choose to live near a busy road and get respiratory problems.

Except there’s no other way to solve a broken leg or pneumonia than medical treatment. There are lots of other ways to lose weight than state sponsored injections.

Apollo365 · 15/10/2024 09:12

Great news, better for the country to get people back into work where possible. It’s about time the government started being proactive rather than reactive. Might help the NHS out.

CoverMeInMarmalade · 15/10/2024 09:13

The only person responsible for someone being fat is that individual

There is not a top nutrional/obesity scientist working today that would say that line (or that would have in the last 20 years or so).

So, on balance, who is more likely to be correct? Someone who has studied the topic for several years in a professional scientific capacity? Or some anonomous mn poster?

It's so hard to tell.... Grin

LadyKenya · 15/10/2024 09:13

itwasnevermine · 15/10/2024 08:55

It does nothing.

Instead of taxing people in poverty why not support them and help them make better choices?

And what does that help entail? The Sure Start centres which educated mothers on what to feed their young children, have all but closed. Food education at school, and cooking lessons are woeful. There needs to be a huge cultural change in the way that food is consumed in this Country. Countless fast food adverts on tv, Just Eat rubbish constantly available, around the clock. The problem is massive.

Frankensteinian · 15/10/2024 09:13

Everyone says that mumsnet is full of threads about mounjauro and ozempic etc but I can’t find them, can anyone help me?

Whatisthisifound · 15/10/2024 09:14

TopshopCropTop · 15/10/2024 09:07

The only person responsible for someone being fat is that individual but now all of a sudden it’s a state responsibility to make them not fat. It makes absolutely no sense. People need to take personal responsibility for their own actions.

I bet you wouldn't say this about poverty. I've edited your post, substituting fat for poor:

The only person responsible for someone being POOR is that individual but now all of a sudden it’s a state responsibility to make them not POOR. It makes absolutely no sense. People need to take personal responsibility for their own actions.

Plenty of people have grown up in households were no meals are cooked from scratch etc. Plenty of people are so busy that they grab shit food in a stress/hurry. Plenty of people have suffered health problems that have contributed significantly to them getting fat. Also, when you go into a supermarket, aside from the meat/fruit/veg aisles, there is so much shit and unhealthy food for sale.

In addition, if I was unemployed with BMI>40, I'm not sure that I'd even want the weight loss injections. They can have nasty side effects and don't address the root cause of the problem.

TopshopCropTop · 15/10/2024 09:14

CoverMeInMarmalade · 15/10/2024 09:13

The only person responsible for someone being fat is that individual

There is not a top nutrional/obesity scientist working today that would say that line (or that would have in the last 20 years or so).

So, on balance, who is more likely to be correct? Someone who has studied the topic for several years in a professional scientific capacity? Or some anonomous mn poster?

It's so hard to tell.... Grin

Who else is responsible for someone eating 5 kebabs a week other than that individual then?

WideFootWelly · 15/10/2024 09:14

There seems to be a misconception that this drug causes weight loss. It doesn't.

For those of us that have tried and struggled to lose weight for years, this drug reduces the appetite and the urge to eat. You still have to diet and exercise, it still takes time and effort and a massive change in behaviours. It assists with those changes.

People can feel superior because they already have that impulse control, or not understand why it's hard for others to have that same control. I already feel shit about it, someone telling me I'm shit for not being able to do what they can doesn't make me eat less - the drug does that.

Dealing with the causes of obesity rather than the effects would be better. But we are where we are, and that also needs addressing.

allaboutthat · 15/10/2024 09:14

@soupfiend perhaps I've touched a nerve. As already stated, due to my line of work I do have concerns that this will impact further down the line and I have those concerns for very good reason. Your defensiveness and faux amusement speaks volumes.

CoverMeInMarmalade · 15/10/2024 09:15

Who else is responsible for someone eating 5 kebabs a week other than that individual then?

Leptin
Ghrelin
Insulin resistance
Survival of the fittest actually meaning survival of the fattest in human society

Just as a starter for ten...

Rummly · 15/10/2024 09:17

Frankensteinian · 15/10/2024 09:13

Everyone says that mumsnet is full of threads about mounjauro and ozempic etc but I can’t find them, can anyone help me?

Find an anti-VAT on school fees thread, turn right, then left, go past the MIL and OLD threads and they’ll all be in front of you.

itwasnevermine · 15/10/2024 09:18

allaboutthat · 15/10/2024 09:14

@soupfiend perhaps I've touched a nerve. As already stated, due to my line of work I do have concerns that this will impact further down the line and I have those concerns for very good reason. Your defensiveness and faux amusement speaks volumes.

Care to share those concerns?

These drugs have been in use for so long

Apollo365 · 15/10/2024 09:19

I’m guessing that it doesn’t deal with the underlying cause of the obesity. So when you stop taking them you go back to square one? (I’m for the jabs btw; but I do see this as an issue)

soupfiend · 15/10/2024 09:20

Cheesecakecookie · 15/10/2024 09:11

Someone upthread actually did suggest these drugs are similar to nicotine patches and anti smoking medicine. I thought that was an excellent analogy.

You are ofcourse still working - but it is much much less effort. Thats the point - the medication makes it easier.

Again they help people quit individually (but once off them many went back to smoking)

but things did not change as a society until we started to really target smoking - and it took years. Initially it was banned indoors. Warnings and changed to types of cigarettes that could be legally sold so as to not encourage smoking.

Lots of gruesome warnings on packets. Then cigarettes had to be behind a screen in the store.

What wasn’t forseen was the popularity of vapes and these were not regulated and allowed to replace cigarettes.

So while smoking is much much less common now a lot of people still vape.

We need to take a similar approach to obesity and medicine is only a small part of that.

I agree and you'll see that portion control is something I suggested as well, the reality is, unpleasant reality is that we really do just need to eat less

Stop making it socially acceptable to eat on the move, buses, trains, walking down the street, millions of chickens shops near kids schools, massive portions in restaurants, plates overflowing with food. Its conditioning, enjoyable but conditioning.

If you have the right hormonal make up, you can portion control yourself, but a mixture of no off switch for many people (Im one), foods that make you crave more food, the socialability of it, the stress of life, means we all eat far too much

Anything that can support a person eat what they should eat, is to be celebrated, if the first step is medication, so be it

And Ive said on a million threads, food manufacturers and supermarkets wont like it if we all eat what we're meant to eat, they want us to overbuy and over eat, its their business model remember.