Dear LoisxMum
Thank you for your query. I am sorry to hear that you are finding your employer to be so difficult, especially at a time when you must be anxious about your daughter.
To answer your last question first, you would unfortunately not be covered by the changes to the law in April 2024. This applied to individuals whose statutory maternity leave period ended on or after 6 April 2024. It sounds as if yours would have ended before this date (in March 2023). Accrued holidays taken prior to returning to work would not extend this period. In any event, the changes in April 2024 simply extended the protected period during which you would have a right of priority to alternative vacancies. This would therefore only have been helpful to you in circumstances where there are alternative vacancies available (and I note that your employer has not been forthcoming about this so it’s not clear whether this would apply).
From your post, it sounds like both redundancy situations have been poorly managed by your employer. For the purposes of this response, it would be sensible to focus on the current exercise (albeit the earlier exercise provides some helpful context as to how you have ended up in the role you are in). As you may be aware, in order to carry out a fair redundancy process, there are three broad requirements for an employer:
Employees are warned about the redundancy and are consulted with about the proposed redundancy in a meaningful way; and
Your employer adopts a fair basis on which to select for redundancy (i.e. they identify an appropriate pool from which to select potentially redundant employees, and select against proper and objective criteria (where selection is required)).
Your employer searches for and, if it is available, offers you suitable alternative employment.
Based on your post, it sounds as if you have concerns about all three areas. I note that your final meeting was due to take place on 6 November. If this went ahead as planned, have you now been given an outcome/notice of termination? Assuming your redundancy has been confirmed, I would recommend that you utilise any right to appeal against that decision. That will give you a further opportunity to formally put forward the reasons why you believe the process is unfair (i.e. the reasons from your post). Your employer will then be required to formally consider and respond to these points.
To address some specific points and questions from your post:
PILON versus garden leave
You are correct that PILON and garden leave are different things. With PILON, you receive a payment in lieu of all or some of your notice period and your employment ends at an earlier date than it otherwise would have. With garden leave, you remain employed during your notice period and receive payment and benefits as normal – however you are not required to attend work.
Generally, garden leave clauses in an employment contract are drafted in such a way that it the decision whether to place an employee on garden leave at the discretion of your employer. From your post, it sounds like that is the case. This means that, whilst you are free to request that your employer puts you on garden leave if there is a benefit to you in this, there would be no obligation for them to do so and they could opt to make a payment to you in lieu of notice instead if they so wished. Although I would flag that this is assuming that they have the right to make a payment in lieu of notice to you under your employment contract. It is worth checking this point because – if they don’t – that will give you a stronger argument that you should remain employed for your notice period as otherwise they would be breaching your contract.
I don’t think you can legitimately use the flexible working request procedure to request garden leave. This is because it does not fall within the category of things about which you can make a statutory request (i.e. hours, times and place of work). It is essentially a request to remain employed for a longer period which is not the purpose of the statutory regime.
I note you consider that their policy of not allowing garden leave is indirectly discriminatory against you on the basis that it puts you at a disadvantage as a working parent. That is an interesting argument, and I don’t believe this point has ever been tested in a court. Whilst I’m not convinced that the argument would necessarily succeed from a legal perspective, it may be helpful to seek to persuade your employer to reconsider their position.
MP
You mention that your MP has written to your employer and your employer has simply responded confirming that they are dealing with it internally. Would it be possible to ask your MP to follow-up on this if your redundancy has now been confirmed?
ACAS
I note that you have started the early conciliation process via ACAS. This is the precursor to being able to bring an employment tribunal claim so is an important step to protect your rights in this regard. I also note that your employer responded to ACAS in the same way as to your MP. Can you ask the ACAS conciliator to follow this up if things have now moved on? Whilst there is no obligation upon your employer to engage in conciliation, they may be more minded to do so if the process has been concluded.
I would also flag that, if you potentially wish to bring a claim for unfair dismissal or sex/pregnancy/maternity discrimination arising out of your dismissal (if that occurs), it is important that you raise a further early conciliation within three months of the date of your dismissal. The one you raised prior to that stage would not be sufficient to also cover that potential claim. You will have three months from the date of dismissal to do so.
Settlement Agreement
I note that you are concerned that your employer may insist upon a settlement agreement. I also note that they had previously asked for an “off the record” conversation. I would flag the following points:
Your employer cannot “insist” upon a settlement agreement. It is up to you whether you wish to enter into discussions regarding a settlement agreement. You cannot be compelled to do so.
If you decide you wish to engage in that process, there is an ACAS Code of Practice which applies (link: https://www.acas.org.uk/acas-code-of-practice-settlement-agreements/html). Whilst this is not binding, it is taken into account by employment tribunals when considering relevant cases.
A settlement agreement is a legal document under which you would waive specific rights to make a claim to an employment tribunal or court. If your employer wishes for you to sign one, they should compensate you appropriately for this (i.e. you should be offered something in excess of your contractual/statutory redundancy entitlement that reflects the value of the rights to bring a tribunal claim that you are waiving)
A settlement agreement can be entered into either whilst you are still employed or after your employment has ended.
Under the Code of Practice, you should be given a reasonable period of time to consider the proposed settlement agreement. As a general rule, this would tend to be a minimum period of 10 calendar days to consider the agreement and receive advice upon it.
You are required to take independent legal advice prior to signing a settlement agreement. Whilst not mandatory, it is common practice for an employer to make a contribution towards, or cover, the cost of this advice.
Given the situation you have described, a negotiated settlement agreement may actually be a helpful way to resolve matters without the need for protracted litigation. It can currently take several years for an employment tribunal claim to be heard so often an alternative means of resolution that enables you to draw a line under matters on terms you believe to be fair may be preferable. This route would allow you the benefit of independent legal advice which would mean that you would have a solicitor who can advise you on your rights/potential remedies and can negotiate on your behalf with your employer. This may provide the best pathway towards a resolution here.
If your employer asks if you are prepared to have a “without prejudice” or “off the record” conversation, it may be worth listening to what they have to say (and what they are prepared to offer). You would be free to walk away from those discussions at any point if you decide you do not wish to go down that route. Unfortunately there are limited options for free representation for tribunal claims. You may be eligible for legal aid: https://www.gov.uk/legal-aid or you should speak to your union, if you are a member, or check whether you have any legal expenses cover on any home or car insurance.
I wish you all the best.