Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

DH workday annual leave underwent termination balance

111 replies

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 14:08

DH underwent a PIP and was told during a PIP review meeting that he had failed the PIP (no review, just told that it was based on feedback from 'stakeholders') and it was being moved to Performance management Panel who would decide the outcome. Yes he can be fired but that is one of the list of different outcomes i.e. no action, extend PIP, first warning, second warning, termination. He was not told he was going to be fired.

However he has logged into workday and it states that the balance has been adjusted- action is called termination adjusted balance. And its dated on the day of PIP review meeting

He has lost his job hasn't he. but why have they not told him formally.

DH thinks it is to frustrate his unfair dismissal claim as there is a 90 day period where you can file the claim.

OP posts:
terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 17:16

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

His usual HR advisor says that they will update re next steps from Performance management panel and they are having a hard time finding two independent members of HR to assess it during the summer holidays i.e. not the usual suspects.

he should continue working in line with PIP objectives in the mean time.

He has an interview with another company tmr.

OP posts:
MrsPinkCock · 29/07/2024 17:17

So have they now clarified that he isn’t fired?

Notice of termination has to be unequivocal and runs from the date he learns of the dismissal. So they can’t backdate it, and it would run from the date that he’s formally told he is being dismissed. That hasn’t happened (yet).

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 17:18

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

yep. his initial manager and then he kinda restructured everyone so my DH was under someone else and another of his direct reports went under another woman. This was in the new year.

OP posts:
terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 17:19

MrsPinkCock · 29/07/2024 17:17

So have they now clarified that he isn’t fired?

Notice of termination has to be unequivocal and runs from the date he learns of the dismissal. So they can’t backdate it, and it would run from the date that he’s formally told he is being dismissed. That hasn’t happened (yet).

yes they want him to continue working in line with his PIP objectives and they told him they are still looking for someone to review his case.

dunno why they are telling him such things.

They want him to work in line with his PIP objectives that he allegely failed.

OP posts:
CantHoldMeDown · 29/07/2024 17:21

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 17:21

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

his manager's manager.

OP posts:
terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 17:30

Mrsttcno1 · 29/07/2024 16:44

Honestly it will just be either a mistake or they haven’t told him yet/HR have jumped the gun. There is no malicious tactic from them to thwart an unfair dismissal claim because after 9 months unless he can prove it is due to a protected characteristic, he hasn’t got an unfair dismissal claim to make.

HR is now saying now that they can't find people to assess his case- when you fail a PIP it gets escalated to a panel and he should work in line with PIP objectives in the meantime.

Is it a mistake then?

OP posts:
StormingNorman · 29/07/2024 17:31

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 14:48

how can HR not know, they were in the same meeting as him. Unless it was some outsourced HR in india...

After the meeting there would have been another meeting, possibly multiple meetings, without your husband. These would have been with HR, his managers and anyone else with a say in the matter.

At some point, it is likely that the decision was made to terminate his employment. Now the decision is made everybody jumps into action to notify your husband and update any systems such as Workday.

Unfortunately, they’ve got the timing wrong and updated the system before he was notified.

Either way, his termination date should be the date he is notified and not before.

It’s a really shitty situation. Can he speak to anyone?

CantHoldMeDown · 29/07/2024 17:33

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 17:37

StormingNorman · 29/07/2024 17:31

After the meeting there would have been another meeting, possibly multiple meetings, without your husband. These would have been with HR, his managers and anyone else with a say in the matter.

At some point, it is likely that the decision was made to terminate his employment. Now the decision is made everybody jumps into action to notify your husband and update any systems such as Workday.

Unfortunately, they’ve got the timing wrong and updated the system before he was notified.

Either way, his termination date should be the date he is notified and not before.

It’s a really shitty situation. Can he speak to anyone?

i don't know if you saw my update.

HR are now claiming they haven't found anyone to assess his case due to summer holidays and he should continue working in line with his PIP objectives. Once they have found someone they would inform him on next steps.

So they have decided to terminate him and yet they are going on with the charade of searching for people to assess his case before a panel?

OP posts:
terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 17:42

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

yes he questioned this but didn't get an answer. Just the process is pending.

The framework does state this- when you fail a PIP it does go to a panel and the panel decides.

If they wanted to dismiss him without a PIP (which they can), it would have gone down another route. but since they picked the PIP route, it should go to panel if they follow the chart and the panel decides- there are different timelines including immediate dismissal but the suggested time frames are 6 weeks (rapid errors) to 20 weeks (PIP, then first warning, second warning, final warning etc).

OP posts:
CantHoldMeDown · 29/07/2024 18:12

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

ItsAlrightDarling · 29/07/2024 18:19

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 17:37

i don't know if you saw my update.

HR are now claiming they haven't found anyone to assess his case due to summer holidays and he should continue working in line with his PIP objectives. Once they have found someone they would inform him on next steps.

So they have decided to terminate him and yet they are going on with the charade of searching for people to assess his case before a panel?

How do you know they’ve decided to terminate?? They haven’t assessed the case yet!

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 18:22

ItsAlrightDarling · 29/07/2024 18:19

How do you know they’ve decided to terminate?? They haven’t assessed the case yet!

Why the termination proration then

OP posts:
ItsAlrightDarling · 29/07/2024 18:23

Proration?

YouveGotAFastCar · 29/07/2024 18:25

Surely he’ll know if the HR person is lying or not. Did his status mention termination before? Surely this isn’t the only time he’s ever logged in?

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 18:27

YouveGotAFastCar · 29/07/2024 18:25

Surely he’ll know if the HR person is lying or not. Did his status mention termination before? Surely this isn’t the only time he’s ever logged in?

This is your leave balance.. it's rhe same for my leave balance too, it gets manually adjusted every year. I don't check my leave days unless I want to apply for leave

So his leave days got adjusted and the action was called 'termination adjustment '.

OP posts:
terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 18:28

ItsAlrightDarling · 29/07/2024 18:23

Proration?

Number of accrued leave days getting adjusted.

Action is called termination proration

OP posts:
Doggymummar · 29/07/2024 18:30

Oof my partner's bank uses workday too for holiday and says that must be a mistake. You would only use that code for an immediate termination.

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 18:35

Doggymummar · 29/07/2024 18:30

Oof my partner's bank uses workday too for holiday and says that must be a mistake. You would only use that code for an immediate termination.

And it can't be an immediate termination cos he is still there and working...

OP posts:
CantHoldMeDown · 29/07/2024 18:39

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

CantHoldMeDown · 29/07/2024 18:40

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

SauviGone · 29/07/2024 18:41

There’s something really fishy going on, are you sure your DH is being honest with you.

terminated2024 · 29/07/2024 18:43

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

They tell him this is what everyone is seeing in the leave system

Tbh in his firm there was a similar incident where in his workday he was given a more junior title in his workday. Think senior analyst. He asked about it and asked whether pay conditions, job title had changed.

They said that it was the same for everyone and everyone had a corporate title (in workday) which was vastly different from the actual title in their job contract.

His pay conditions title were not changed.

OP posts:
ItsAlrightDarling · 29/07/2024 18:44

He needs to sort this out himself. If he’s holding a senior position in a bank I’m sure he can figure out a way to clarify what is going on.

Swipe left for the next trending thread