Hi, I wonder if any HR-minded MNers can help me understand whether I’m right in thinking the way my organisation deals with bank hols is unfair to part-timers?
A/L and bank hols are rolled up together and as I work 30hrs a week I receive 0.8 of a full-timer’s allowance (so far so good). We work a 37.5 hour week so I get a total of 210hrs.
Then, at the start of the year, HR apply all the bank hols to the software system, so they get deducted from your total allowance. They deduct all bank holidays, including ones that fall on non-working days. They have a system where 7.5hrs is deducted for full-timers, 6hrs for 0.8 wte, 4.5hrs for 0.6 wte and so on as a sliding scale. (Not sure what I think of this but it’s not my main issue...)
I work Tues-Fri, so to my mind I am losing out. In 21/22 there are 6 Monday bank hols, so I am being deducted 36 hours paid leave allowance for days when I don’t work anyway. On a week with a bank holiday Monday I would still work my full 30 hours, while being deducted 6hours. A colleague who works Mon-Thurs would work 22.5hrs, having 7.5hr off on the Monday (for a 6hr deduction).
Sorry for the essay but this is driving me mad as it feels really unfair. I have queried it with the HR staff member who deals with this, but we seem always to talk at cross purposes. She says the old system (think NHS) was unfair because someone not working Mondays would get an extra 30 hours leave to use at other times. I don’t agree - yes not working Mondays would give you more flexibility as you could use those hours whenever you want, but you would would not be getting more paid leave.
I am starting to think I will just change my days so I am not disadvantaged by the system, but equally it makes me uncomfortable that part-timers across the organisation might be losing out on paid leave unfairly. Have I got this wrong? Happy to be told I have, as at least then I can get this bee out of my bonnet and don’t have to get into a row with HR! Thanks!