Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Thread gallery
9
StealthTroublemaker · 24/10/2026 23:36

CoolforKats · 24/10/2026 23:25

Still running from any substantive arguments?

No debate? Lol.

Edited

You made a substantive argument? When? Or is your definition of “substantive argument” different from the one the rest of the world uses?

HenriettaSwanLeavitt2 · 24/10/2026 23:37

CoolforKats · 24/10/2026 23:29

Wow, you really are triggered by this guy's commentary aren't you?

Well there can only be one solution for that, more of the same to 'desensitise' you. I look forward to making him a regular here. See the things I do for you?

Wow. Someone really got his butt hurt yesterday. Modelling the language of an abusive male today. Seems like you have a valid association there.

Hedgehogforshort · 24/10/2026 23:41

I bothered to read the spew of bollocks, because it struck me as belonging to new age Marxism, AKA post modernism.

Cats is espousing, via cut and paste or AI what they believe to be a Marxist position. When in reality it bears no relationship to it.

New age Marxists, mostly have no scooby doo about Marxist thinking. They have never read Hegal, or the schools, of philosophy) that lead Marx to suppose or posit what might happen in the future in rather large tomes which are a very difficult read.

they have not analysed the Bolshevik’s, the Russian revolution, and how Lenin could not have survived leadership in the takeover, since the working class in Russia was a rare beast indeed.

Marx got more than a few things correct, and invented the science of economics. He never however predicted the dynamism of capitalism, and the rise and fall of working class power of the unions.

The capitalisation of society and new technology.

I am an old school Marxist. I hung around in the SWP for many years but maintained a level of skepticism around certain issues.

Not least the strutting of the mostly male thinkers within the party, who did not think we needed the “womens voice” any longer.

I had a right laugh recently in corresponding on face book with these absolute loons.

Suddenly Engels was in favour (which they sent me a link to) so sent them a photo of my holding all of his writings, LOL.

HenriettaSwanLeavitt2 · 24/10/2026 23:50

HenriettaSwanLeavitt2 · 24/10/2026 23:48

If anyone is finding the nonsense on this thread rather tedious, Hannah Barnes has written a great Sunday Times article on the Redvers vs NHS Sussex case.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5591526-redvers-v-nhs-sussex-integrated-care-board-mr-adam-doyle-thread-3?page=14&reply=155538409

For Cass, the scandal that has unfolded in Brighton “dwarfs” that of the Tavistock’s Gids. She called on the GMC to immediately suspend Hall. “I really would want to ask why he still has a licence to practise.”

Hedgehogforshort · 24/10/2026 23:52

I forgot to say the one thing the loons cannot stand is the collective action of women, who include women the only fucking thing going on from left rights and centre

modern Marxists hate women, as much as the far right, especially the rise of GC feminism.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 24/10/2026 23:53

StealthTroublemaker · 24/10/2026 23:36

You made a substantive argument? When? Or is your definition of “substantive argument” different from the one the rest of the world uses?

Substantive Argument headlined Reading in 2003

StealthTroublemaker · 24/10/2026 23:56

Ereshkigalangcleg · 24/10/2026 23:53

Substantive Argument headlined Reading in 2003

ah, so was that poster mixing up the band and some words…. I mean after the Churchill/A team confusion anything is possible….

HenriettaSwanLeavitt2 · Yesterday 00:03

Ereshkigalangcleg · 24/10/2026 23:53

Substantive Argument headlined Reading in 2003

Don't start. You're supposed to be on R&R.😘

GreyskySexRealistsky · Yesterday 00:06

Ereshkigalangcleg · 24/10/2026 23:53

Substantive Argument headlined Reading in 2003

IIRC they were on right after Incoherent Ramblings, who got booed off and pelted with Tunnocks

StealthTroublemaker · Yesterday 00:07

CoolforKats · 24/10/2026 23:22

🤪

My god, the AI Qanon is strong in this one….

You seem to be struggling a bit. My advice..
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them... maybe you can hire The A-Team.

FlirtsWithRhinos · Yesterday 00:08

HenriettaSwanLeavitt2 · 24/10/2026 23:48

If anyone is finding the nonsense on this thread rather tedious, Hannah Barnes has written a great Sunday Times article on the Redvers vs NHS Sussex case.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5591526-redvers-v-nhs-sussex-integrated-care-board-mr-adam-doyle-thread-3?page=14&reply=155538409

Thank you so much for this link. I've not been able to follow the tribunal thread for this one and was wondering where to get a summary.

Myalternate · Yesterday 00:08

Gosh, I just love you women on this board ❤️

FlirtsWithRhinos · Yesterday 00:13

StealthTroublemaker · Yesterday 00:07

You seem to be struggling a bit. My advice..
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them... maybe you can hire The A-Team.

In the early 20th century, a group of men in dresses was encouraged to use the facilities for a biology they didn’t possess. These men promptly adopted female personalities and escaped from a niche fetish to become online media and political darlings. Today, still feted by the estalblishment, they survive as soldiers of culture. If you have a problem, if no one else can help and if you can find them, maybe you can hire, The TRA-Team.

Da da da da, dah dah dah

StealthTroublemaker · Yesterday 00:15

FlirtsWithRhinos · Yesterday 00:13

In the early 20th century, a group of men in dresses was encouraged to use the facilities for a biology they didn’t possess. These men promptly adopted female personalities and escaped from a niche fetish to become online media and political darlings. Today, still feted by the estalblishment, they survive as soldiers of culture. If you have a problem, if no one else can help and if you can find them, maybe you can hire, The TRA-Team.

Da da da da, dah dah dah

JFC!! That is epic! I am so stealing that!

Ereshkigalangcleg · Yesterday 00:26

HenriettaSwanLeavitt2 · Yesterday 00:03

Don't start. You're supposed to be on R&R.😘

I am 😂

Ereshkigalangcleg · Yesterday 00:27

FlirtsWithRhinos · Yesterday 00:13

In the early 20th century, a group of men in dresses was encouraged to use the facilities for a biology they didn’t possess. These men promptly adopted female personalities and escaped from a niche fetish to become online media and political darlings. Today, still feted by the estalblishment, they survive as soldiers of culture. If you have a problem, if no one else can help and if you can find them, maybe you can hire, The TRA-Team.

Da da da da, dah dah dah

Beautiful 😍

Igneococcus · Yesterday 00:49

I was briefly glad my internet is back (storm still getting worse however) but then I saw that rambling piece of pseudo-intellectual vacuity upthread. I find it hard to believe anyone would share that unless they want to embarrass the author.

nutmeg7 · Yesterday 03:13

CoolforKats · 24/10/2026 23:16

They are in the quote. Can't you read?

Edited

Can’t you write?
Why can’t you précis the key points yourself?

Datun · Yesterday 06:01

GreyskySexRealistsky · Yesterday 00:06

IIRC they were on right after Incoherent Ramblings, who got booed off and pelted with Tunnocks

I remember that. The closer was meant to be New Paragraphs, but unfortunately, they didn't show up

Igneococcus · Yesterday 06:10

Datun · Yesterday 06:01

I remember that. The closer was meant to be New Paragraphs, but unfortunately, they didn't show up

I'm not too sad about that, to be frank.

Imdunfer · Yesterday 07:26

HenriettaSwanLeavitt2 · 24/10/2026 21:30

It's because they are men I imagine. I can't get over a female, black nurse being called a n**r (!!!) and yet the omnicause still goes in to bat for the trans, male rapist.

Edit: strange interaction between MN and asterisks, sorry

Edited

You couldn't make some of this stuff up, could you? A prisoner attended by a prison officer calls a nurse a n----r after she referred to him as he in talking to a doctor about an issue related to male anatomy, and she's the one in trouble.

I really hope that we will look back on this period from the future and be able to laugh about how ridiculous it all was, but it feels a long way from that at the moment.

TakingMyChancesWithTheRabbits · Yesterday 08:17

Heggettypeg · 24/10/2026 07:24

It's in a song from the Gilbert and Sullivan opera "Patience" - the one where they're taking the piss out of the Aesthetic Movement. First line: If you're anxious for to shine..

Thank you, I shall have to familiarise myself with that, as my G&S knowledge is mostly The Mikado and bits of Pirates of Penzance and Iolanthe.

2021x · Yesterday 08:39

FlirtsWithRhinos · Yesterday 00:13

In the early 20th century, a group of men in dresses was encouraged to use the facilities for a biology they didn’t possess. These men promptly adopted female personalities and escaped from a niche fetish to become online media and political darlings. Today, still feted by the estalblishment, they survive as soldiers of culture. If you have a problem, if no one else can help and if you can find them, maybe you can hire, The TRA-Team.

Da da da da, dah dah dah

I have thought about how this will be portrayed in future text books;

In the early 21st century, individualisation and capitalism collided. As a result of 20th-century human rights movements, the main issues of discrimination in society were on a path to resolution. This resulted in human rights activists and organisations with little purpose and rising costs.

A solution was found to increase the breadth of the previous causes. Disability charities widened the definition of atypical neurological presentation and developed a new term - neurodivergence so inclusive that everyone could be involved. Women's rights were expanded to include disability caused by menopause and an unquantifiable "pay-gap". The biggest expansion: Lesbian and Gay rights found a way to include the most lucrative of recruits; insecure adolescents with body image issues and wealthy middle-aged men, by telling them their fetish was a healthy and normal state of being.

Verisregina · Yesterday 09:04

CoolforKats · 24/10/2026 22:53

They are my own arguments. Just better written & historically researched. That you believe that means they must be AI is……bonkers.

If you admire it, then at least have the decency to acknowledge the author.

But really, despite all that verbiage, the bottom line is that JKR thinks women have the right to singles sex spaces and protection in law and has said so.

It must be galling that she can’t be silenced by the rape and death threats, or forced into accepting TWAW, and has enough cultural and financial capital to keep on supporting and promoting women’s rights and stating the bleeding obvious that TWAreNotW.