A growing threat: the anti-rights movement in the UK says Amnesty who claim over 50% are Gender Critical groups

[IwantToRetire]

Quote:

Anti-rights actors seek a society in which women and men have fixed and distinct roles, based on what they view as ‘natural’ and ‘traditional’. These actors perceive the idea that gender is socially constructed as a threat because it suggests that gender roles can, and do, change across societies and over time. In fact, progress in the rights of women and LGBT+ people has been underpinned by changing understandings of gender and social roles.

Anti-rights actors refer to this perceived threat as ‘gender ideology’, portraying it as an attack on national traditions, family structures, marriage and religious freedom. These narratives often seek to generate fear and uncertainty and rely on misinformation or exaggerated claims.

The term ‘gender ideology’ emerged in the context of debates within international institutions, particularly the United Nations, about gender equality and sexual and reproductive rights.

In 1964, the Holy See became a Permanent Observer at the UN General Assembly, the only religious body with this status. As a permanent observer the Holy See can participate in processes at the General Assembly as well as other UN bodies. It cannot vote but it has the possibility to co-sponsor resolutions if a member state requests a vote. Although it cannot vote, the Holy See can participate in UN discussions and processes and has played an influential role in debates on women's rights and LGBT+ rights.

The term ‘gender ideology’ gained prominence in response to progress on gender equality and Cairo in 1994. These conference were a landmark moment for the global women's rights movement. The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action is widely regarded as a key international framework for advancing women's rights and gender equality, and states continue to report on its implementation through the Commission on the Status of Women.

While opposition to sexual and reproductive rights predates the Beijing conference, the term ‘gender ideology’ became a particularly important response to the advances achieved there. The phrase was coined to explain the growing influence of gender equality agendas and to mobilise opposition to them.

Although the term originated in debates at the international level, it has since become a broad political narrative used by a wide range of anti-rights actors. Today, it is often used to connect campaigns against gender equality, sexual and reproductive rights, and LGBT+ rights across different countries and contexts.

From intro to report at
https://media.amnesty.org.uk/documents/Report_-_A_growing_threat__the_anti-rights_movement_in_the_UK_July_2026.pdf

See images of the list of 51 groups Amnesty is claiming are right wing.

I think she overstepped and either they don't check what's being published, which is shoddy, or - the more likely IMO - they didn't see anything wrong with it and thought it was fair enough.
I despise what they've become. Transactivism destroys everything it touches

Its a lot basically Amnesty issued a report listing virtually every vaguely gender critical group run by women or gays in the UK alongside a bunch of Christian and right wing groups and said they were all working to end human rights.

No real evidence was provided of how Turning Point UK and For Women Scotland for example are similar organisations or have similar agendas in any way. It was just labelling everything they don't like as being BAD. In fact the groups mentioned are working to defend women's and gay rights which are legally recognised under the Equality act.

Various groups wrote letters demanding apologies and evidence. Amnesty took the report down but it is still being widely shared and groups are being harrassed online by TAs. Amnesty are now panicking probably because their lawyers are certainly saying they have libelled 50 plus organisations with minimal defence. See the news report I just linked above.

Amnesty International UK has now expressed "regret" that the report was uploaded without the proper checks.

That's odd because the report doesn't seem to differ from opinions already expressed by Chiara Caparo in her capacity as an employee and representative of Amnesty.

Also, given that the report was funded by donations, isn't the problem less that it was uploaded and more the quality of the report? We aren't talking about a few typos here.

Amnesty UK received a £3 million donation from the Postcode Lottery last year. Are they aware that Amnesty just seem to make things up as they go along?

Well yes, and she's also slandered all those groups, as well as libelled them, by appearing on a podcast talking about it. No - they didn't think anything she said was wrong because they just. don't. think. anymore.

She absolutely gives every impression in her promotion of the reports that Amnesty is sponsoring this work entirely.

If they can. But it might not be be that easy because (especially having listened to the red-faced Irish bloke) surely she only wrote down what the rest of them all think?

Bring on the popcorn!

She is being paid £80,000 a year for this shambles.

I would like to think she would be fired, but the rot is deep. I think it was only looked at by TA staff and didn't bother running it past a sane lawyer.

We know they think this. I know a dozen people here in oh-so-virtuous-newly-Green-councilled-London, who think this. Gaaah it's so frustrating.

Yes, because unless they make humiliating apologies I suspect some of these orgs will sue. And they’ll get backlash from TRAs if they back down, they are already getting it now.

I really really want an almighty big joint court case from this. One even the BBC and the Guardian cannot ignore.
Is it too much to hope for?

I shouldn't laugh.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I wonder if some random junior will be sacked as a scapegoat.

However Amnesty will have to apologise and eat dirt and fully retract the report as the only way to avoid legal action. Even then some groups might pursue them anyway and get an out of court settlement. I mean "nasty women said mean things so had to lie about them" is not likely to go well in court.

Chiara will not like that. She might resign or be pushed into it.

Would be very helpful to get everything out in the open.

Really drill down into whether somebody giving advice to de-transitioners is undertaking conversion practices.

The spokesperson seems to think that the issue with the report is that it was uploaded to the website. They have such a long way to go.

Don't they just? This is why (I think) separate complaints is the way to go. The report smeared 50 different organisations all with different aims and different structures and each potentially asking for a slightly different outcome. They don't all have to be satisfied by a single generic response. Amnesty don't know who's going to turn the big legal guns on them and who's going to get picked up by the press.

Harder to ignore and harder to conspiracy-theory than a single uber-complaint.

True. If they sack her for this I might bung a few quid towards her employment tribunal.

Or everyone was too scared to speak out at Amnesty (irony klaxon) as we have seen in the NHS, other charities and corporate entities.

As I mentioned earlier Chiara was probably a key figure in pushing Amnesty's intervention in the Supreme Court case. Their case was not strong apparently and helped FWS get a win and also destroyed TA standard arguments in law.

SEX MATTERS summary

Amnesty International intervened in the FWS case to argue against the biological basis of sex in the Equality Act. It made the argument that “A blanket policy of barring trans women from single sex services [intended for women] is not a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim.”

It argued that the construction of sex put forward by FWS failed “to recognise that a trans woman with a GRC is in a significantly different situation to a cisgender man and therefore, [ECHR] Article 14 [which protects against discrimination in relation to the realisation of human rights] requires that she be treated differently from him i.e. not be excluded from a single sex service or from sport on the same basis (and for the same reasons) as a cisgender man (unless the failure to do so can be proportionately justified).”

These arguments were dismissed by the Supreme Court.
You do not need to continue to negotiate with individuals and groups advancing this argument. It has been found to be wrong in law.
https://sex-matters.org/posts/publications/supreme-court-judgment-summary-and-practical-advice

Maybe Chiara is a secret Terf deliberately undermining the TA cause :)

Or she could be hopeless.

Redtoothbrush
Oh yes, those lower in the hierarchy. Know it well (education).

Amnesty will not repent though. The TRA capture is embedded into the organisation.
One smack on the wrist and a step back from Amnesty is a small thing, done in hope of avoiding court cases.

From the TRA pov, only they have the right to take court action.

FSW have said “further measures may be necessary”. Hopefully a temporary retraction of the report will not be enough to stop for further measures to being taken.

The Good Law Project will work to the bone to dispute and disrupt the lawful ruling and implementation of sex based spaces.

Note " its use of language".

In other words, " we see nothing wrong with what she said, just the way she said it" ?

Is the Snowball report still up?

There were two reports by Chiara that appear to be defamatory, the previous one published on the same website in May this year, I believe. Did the other one also slip through unchecked?

Also important because one of the key bits of misinformation in the report was the suggestion that these organisations can all be lumped together.

I think they might also be attempting to avoid admission of wrong doing while they seek legal advice.

They have to find an excuse for removing the report from the website that doesn’t suggest that they agree that it might be libellous.