That is flatly incorrect. There are plenty of studies showing that transition has a positive effect, but you also find some reason that the study is invalid. Too small sample size, etc.
Well yes, too small sample size does make a study invalid. That's science, not my decision.
More to the point: why hasn't a large scientific study been commissioned yet? You know, like the one WPATH once did... which they then suppressed, because it wasn't showing what they wanted it to?
There are many trans people that will tell you their life is better because they transitioned.
But is it better than if we still had our whole, healthy bodies while experiencing no dysphoria anymore? That is what I'm comparing transitioning to.
What you’re doing here is pulling the ladder up behind you. You got yours, so now everyone else can suffer.
On the contrary: I want better standards of care for current trans people than I received.
What about the people who are happy with their changes, but those will disappear if forced on the hormones for their birth sex?
It won't matter because they will be happy with their birth sex. You seem to be under the impression that I want to stop the current model of transition without proposing anything in exchange. That's not the case. This sub-thread is about treating gender dysphoria as the mental illness that it is, and thus developing a working therapy for it which doesn't touch the body (beyond possible psychiatric medicine).
You do realise this had been tried, right? You can look up the stories of people treated by NHS psychiatric services before transition was routinely available. All that did was cause trauma and they were still trans after.
Neuro-psychiatry has massively evolved since those times decades ago. It is high time another shot was taken at this problem, and the truly barbaric "cutting up body parts" model be abandoned.