I'm not quite sure what you're asking, but I'll explain a bit more, then perhaps if that doesn't answer your question, you can respond? I will assume you have posted in good faith.
As I see it, the transactivism that has embedded itself in the UK in schools, the NHS, public sector organizations, private sector companies, social organizations, etc., and which has been encouraged, supported, and fought for through the courts by governments (Scottish Government, anyone?), does in itself work to remove rights from women and girls, parents, healthcare workers, lesbians (and to a lesser extent gay men), and generally anyone who won't bow down to the Great Gender God and its ideology.
This ideology seeks to remove dignity and privacy rights from women and girls; remove the rights of parents to know what their children are being taught in schools; the rights of medics to be able to treat patients without fear and confusion over misgendering and needing to know someone's biological sex; the rights of lesbians (and gay men) to associate with only those of their own sex, etc.
Lumping gays, lesbians, and bisexuals together with the TQ+. etc., is disingenuous and wrong. The first tranche is about sexual attraction. The second is about identity.
Disabled people can sometimes be disadvantaged by transactivism, e.g. the first toilets to be taken (now that trans-identified men have had it made clear to them that using the women's toilets is, and always has been, unlawful) seems likely to be accessible/universal toilets that disabled people and their carers need. Transactivism in employment situations has also resulted in a lot of money for "trans" issues that could have been spent on improving disabled people's ability to work.
Trans-identified people already have all the rights that everyone else has. What the activists are demanding are the rights that already belong to other people, especially women and girls. This is what government, charities, schools, the NHS, civil service, etc., have been colluding in.
Not sure why you brought race into this, but you either genuinely want to talk about that, or it's the usual "gotcha.". But, people who are disadvantaged by other people's views of their race also have rights.
I think you know all this already, because someone would already have told you, but just in case you haven't heard any of it before, there you go.
If you are going to respond, please don't do the activist "I'll pick one thing I understand and run with that" answer. I have responded to you in good faith, and in the round, as it were, so I would expect you to do likewise. If you don't, you won't get any further response from me.