Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Former teacher guilty of sexually abusing and murdering baby boy he wanted to adopt - CPS

509 replies

IwantToRetire · 15/06/2026 17:52

Distressing content
-----

A former teacher has been found guilty of sexually abusing and murdering a baby boy that he planned to adopt.

Jamie Varley, 37, was convicted at Preston Crown Court of murder, child cruelty, sexual offences and indecent images relating to 13-month-old Preston Davey.

John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, was convicted of allowing the death of a child, child cruelty and sexual assault.

Varley was in the process of adopting baby Preston (also known as Elijah) with his partner McGowan-Fazakerley. Just four months after being placed with the couple, Preston was taken to Blackpool Victoria Hospital unconscious and in cardiac arrest. Sadly, Preston could not be saved.

Varley tried falsely claiming that Preston had accidentally drowned in a bath, but prosecutors were able to prove that his injuries were consistent with his airways being obstructed.

The evidence presented by the prosecution proved that in the final months of Preston’s life, he was routinely ill-treated, sexually abused and physically assaulted – suffering more than 40 separate injuries.

CPS statement continues at https://www.cps.gov.uk/north-west/news/former-teacher-guilty-sexually-abusing-and-murdering-baby-boy-he-wanted-adopt

More from a BBC report - also distressing:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyp77l79e9o

I thought there was a thread about this, but cant find one. But sorry if a duplicate.

I really only wanted to post out of respect for this poor baby and the horror of his short life.

RIP Flowers

Baby with curly light brown hair sitting in high chair. He has his finger in his mouth. He is wearing a baby grow with an elephant on it.

How adoptive parents' lies unravelled to reveal 'reign of terror'

Preston Davey died in hospital in July 2023 after months of sexual and physical abuse at the hands.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyp77l79e9o

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
fartotheleftside · 16/06/2026 10:38

In the article it says that Oldham council have no record of the granny asking to keep Preston after her cancer treatment was finished. Why are they saying that?

lcakethereforeIam · 16/06/2026 10:39

Correct me if I'm wrong but Preston's birth family and possibly his foster mother were in Oldham. At least that's where he was taken into care. He was adopted by these men in Blackpool, a fair distance away. Putting to one side why, out of a huge chunk of the country's potential adopters a baby (highly sought after by families seeking to adopt), he was given to two men, Blackpool is stuffed full of children's homes. The LA had to pass a law to prevent planning permission being given to even more. The area is also one of the most economically deprived in the country. I suspect the social workers are run off their feet, underpaid, burned out and not sticking around. Other organisations, the NHS, etc. that deal with 'looked after' kids are probably also run ragged. Perhaps stuff that would raise a May Day's worth of red flags somewhere else is just 'Tuesday' in Blackpool.

Fillies4DeclanRice · 16/06/2026 10:42

mrsbowes · 16/06/2026 09:47

If you were trying to find a family for a baby and your choices were a woman in her 60s with cancer, who had already had their own child removed from their care to be placed in a yoi for torturing and murdering someone OR a couple in their 30s with good jobs, a nice home, one of them a well respected and well liked teacher, great references, childcare experience, loving and supportive families, passed all checks and vetting, which would you go for?
Especially given that the baby is going to need a permanent home for the next 18-20 years and it's unknown if he will have any developmental or behavioural issues as he grows up but had a very shaky start in life.

Whether you agree or not the law is that prospective adopters cannot be discriminated against due to their sex, so the social worker couldn't have ruled them out on that basis.

How do we know that the only other option to the grandmother was the two men?

mrsbowes · 16/06/2026 10:44

Fillies4DeclanRice · 16/06/2026 10:42

How do we know that the only other option to the grandmother was the two men?

It would have been waiting for grandmother or looking for a suitable adoptive family.

AstonUniversityPotholeDepartment · 16/06/2026 10:46

fartotheleftside · 16/06/2026 10:38

In the article it says that Oldham council have no record of the granny asking to keep Preston after her cancer treatment was finished. Why are they saying that?

Perhaps she asked verbally, e.g. at a case meeting, not in writing, and the person making records of the meeting didn't record the request.

I can tell you from personal experience that social workers are horrific at minutes and records of meetings. (I am not a social worker which is presumably why I am an acknowledged Queen of comprehensive, relevant minutes and meeting records.)

TeaAndStrumpets · 16/06/2026 10:48

Imdunfer · 16/06/2026 10:12

If you were trying to find a family for a baby and your choices were a woman in her 60s with cancer, who had already had their own child removed from their care to be placed in a yoi for torturing and murdering someone

You have missed a couple of vital parts of that story. The first is that her daughter murdered someone as a teenage decades ago and she was imprisoned, not taken away from her mother for poor parenting. The second is that granny already had his sister.

You might also mention that survival rates are really good for breast cancer these days and that her prognosis is good, I think, and she has a life expectancy into him being an adult. Also that the delay in handing him over would only have been because she would not be allowed to lift him for a couple of months.

Changes the picture a bit, doesn't it?

Yes you are right on this. There are plenty of people caring for grandchildren into their 70s, not all full time but for significant stretches. I've seen it a lot with friends who become grandparents late in life. One at least has had three lots of cancer and significant surgery, she adores her grandchildren and once recovered she has gone back to looking after them as often as she is needed.

Fillies4DeclanRice · 16/06/2026 10:49

mrsbowes · 16/06/2026 10:44

It would have been waiting for grandmother or looking for a suitable adoptive family.

But it's very unlikely that the only suitable family they could find were two men.

Plus from some of the videos that have been doing the rounds, one of the men (the teacher) seemed a highly unstable man.

The same thing happened with Pride in Surrey. There were so many red flags with the founder, Stephen Ireland, including him dressing up children in bondage gear, but the authorities, including the police, schools, the BBC and foster care in Surrey, ignored them all because they didn't want to appear to be homophobic. He was allowed to run a phoneline using his own mobile phone for vulnerable children to call him. The result? He kidnapped, drugged and raped a child.

He was sentenced last June. Also during Pride month.

The media largely ignored the story.

Snufkin88 · 16/06/2026 10:51

Squirrelchops1 · 15/06/2026 18:02

I'm with you
I hope they're strung up in a position they can be sexually assaulted like they did to this poor baby. Death penalty is too good for them....daily forced oral and anal penetration against their will is a far better punishment.

To be honest reading about this is so horrific it makes me feel numb . I’m not sure there is any punishment out there good enough for these evil disgusting people .

TeaAndStrumpets · 16/06/2026 10:55

Fillies4DeclanRice · 16/06/2026 10:49

But it's very unlikely that the only suitable family they could find were two men.

Plus from some of the videos that have been doing the rounds, one of the men (the teacher) seemed a highly unstable man.

The same thing happened with Pride in Surrey. There were so many red flags with the founder, Stephen Ireland, including him dressing up children in bondage gear, but the authorities, including the police, schools, the BBC and foster care in Surrey, ignored them all because they didn't want to appear to be homophobic. He was allowed to run a phoneline using his own mobile phone for vulnerable children to call him. The result? He kidnapped, drugged and raped a child.

He was sentenced last June. Also during Pride month.

The media largely ignored the story.

Jimmy Savile Syndrome. Lessons are never learned.

HenriettaSwanLeavitt · 16/06/2026 11:08

I think the point about not letting men adopt non-verbal children is well-made. DH took our pre-school DC to A&E twice in a short period of time, for injuries from accidents at home. On the second occasion DC was taken to a separate room and asked to explain in their own words what had happened. You can't do that with a very young child.
Rest in peace, Preston

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 16/06/2026 11:19

Jane379 · 16/06/2026 02:33

I think the question is men specifically. A single male paedophile could also prey on children this way. A woman being present does dilute the danger at least somewhat. Ban adoption by men alone maybe- whether gay male couples or single men.

I didn't know that single men are allowed to adopt. But I agree that they shouldn't be.

SwirlyGates · 16/06/2026 11:30

Imdunfer · 15/06/2026 20:53

What BBC news?

It wasn't covered at all on the six o'clock news tonight, I waited for it.

It was covered in the regional news Northwest Tonight and I want to know who made the decision that the choking of a baby by a paedophile sex abuser wasn't worth of the main news.

Maybe it was considered too disturbing for children to see pre-watershed? But is there even a watershed any more?

SwirlyGates · 16/06/2026 11:35

AstonUniversityPotholeDepartment · 16/06/2026 10:20

It was their anger and rage at Preston for behaving like a baby.

They expected a living doll they could sexually abuse and then put to bed for the night, and he cried. Their abuse made him cry more, so they got angrier They didn't form any emotional bond with him, so they didn't empathise with him when he was suffering, no matter how extreme. There was nothing there internally, no conscience, no empathy, to prompt restraint. The only limit they could have had was fear of external intervention, and they already knew they could talk rings around social services. If Preston was still alive, he's probably still be with them now.

I don't intend to idealise biological parents, because biological parents do abuse and kill their children. But any kind of emotional bond towards the child on the abusing adult's part will act as a brake on the adult's most violent impulses. The abuser will take a longer period to reach lethal levels of violence, or never reach that level at all. As we now know, JV had no brake and he exerted no limits on his rage. In fact, he seems to have wallowed in his rage.

How on earth did they get through the adoption vetting? You don't just select a child and take them home, there are all sorts of rules and regulations.

Imdunfer · 16/06/2026 11:47

SwirlyGates · 16/06/2026 11:30

Maybe it was considered too disturbing for children to see pre-watershed? But is there even a watershed any more?

It was on Northwest Tonight at 6.30 because it's in the north west, so they don't get off the hook for not having it on the national news on that one.

CrossPurposes · 16/06/2026 11:53

Imdunfer · 16/06/2026 11:47

It was on Northwest Tonight at 6.30 because it's in the north west, so they don't get off the hook for not having it on the national news on that one.

It was on the national news - both the six and ten. Both times approximately two thirds in.

Imdunfer · 16/06/2026 11:58

CrossPurposes · 16/06/2026 11:53

It was on the national news - both the six and ten. Both times approximately two thirds in.

It was not on the six o'clock news last night unless I blinked and missed it. I was waiting for it. I hope you are right, though.

mintleavesandthyme · 16/06/2026 11:58

do SS encourage women who’ve had there babies removed to have contraception ? I’m against reproductive control in all circumstances. But forced adoption is state imposed reproductive control.

We must all remember that if it wasn’t Preston who was murdered then it would be another baby. The murderers were allowed to adopt, manipulating SS the whole way.

CrossPurposes · 16/06/2026 12:07

Imdunfer · 16/06/2026 11:58

It was not on the six o'clock news last night unless I blinked and missed it. I was waiting for it. I hope you are right, though.

You can check on iPlayer.

JadeSeahorse · 16/06/2026 12:25

AstonUniversityPotholeDepartment · 16/06/2026 10:20

It was their anger and rage at Preston for behaving like a baby.

They expected a living doll they could sexually abuse and then put to bed for the night, and he cried. Their abuse made him cry more, so they got angrier They didn't form any emotional bond with him, so they didn't empathise with him when he was suffering, no matter how extreme. There was nothing there internally, no conscience, no empathy, to prompt restraint. The only limit they could have had was fear of external intervention, and they already knew they could talk rings around social services. If Preston was still alive, he's probably still be with them now.

I don't intend to idealise biological parents, because biological parents do abuse and kill their children. But any kind of emotional bond towards the child on the abusing adult's part will act as a brake on the adult's most violent impulses. The abuser will take a longer period to reach lethal levels of violence, or never reach that level at all. As we now know, JV had no brake and he exerted no limits on his rage. In fact, he seems to have wallowed in his rage.

Brilliant post!

Articulates beautifully what most of us are thinking/feeling.

Arran2024 · 16/06/2026 13:36

hihelenhi · 16/06/2026 00:25

Yes, that's kind of what I'd always thought. So why would you place a young nonverbal baby like Preston in the care of two very inexperienced men? Did they give THAT good an account of themselves, really? JMF claimed in his testimony (yes, I know quite a bit of it is trying to blame everyone but themselves) that their adoption "training" was mostly online, and didn't mention safeguarding (obvious bollocks, esp as JV was meant to know all about it). But how true is that? What is the 'training' once the supposedly extensive vetting is completed?

I suspect there was an ethnicity angle to it. One of the men has a surname Fazarkely which sounds unusual to me. I am an adopter - ethnicity is the absolute line in the sand when it comes to adoption. Sws try their best to come up with a match or near match. I don't know Preston's heritage but if his birth father was eg Indian, there is no doubt they are going to look for someone with links to that heritage.

SilenceInside · 16/06/2026 13:39

@Arran2024 Fazakerley is a suburb of Liverpool, so it's an English place-based surname, originating from Old English.

TeaAndStrumpets · 16/06/2026 13:52

SilenceInside · 16/06/2026 13:39

@Arran2024 Fazakerley is a suburb of Liverpool, so it's an English place-based surname, originating from Old English.

Of course Fazakerley is a normal long established English name.

Also there was a photo of his Dad in the Times. White English as far as I can see. He looked very much like Preston.

AzureStaffy · 16/06/2026 14:35

Imdunfer · 16/06/2026 09:13

It's s about reducing risk, not eliminating it.

Yes, but the issue was should adoption always involve a woman in the household so I was considering if women are necessarily always protective or do they put their relationship before the welfare of the child.

As many abusers choose their partners with great care with regard to them being colluders in abuse, it isn't always the case that women will report their partner.

maudelovesharold · 16/06/2026 14:38

Imdunfer · 16/06/2026 11:58

It was not on the six o'clock news last night unless I blinked and missed it. I was waiting for it. I hope you are right, though.

It definitely was on the BBC News at 6, as I said upthread, because dh and I sat through the report in stunned and horrified silence. It rendered us speechless. Someone responded to my post saying it was 20 mins. in, so very much down the running order.

AzureStaffy · 16/06/2026 14:43

AstonUniversityPotholeDepartment · 16/06/2026 10:20

It was their anger and rage at Preston for behaving like a baby.

They expected a living doll they could sexually abuse and then put to bed for the night, and he cried. Their abuse made him cry more, so they got angrier They didn't form any emotional bond with him, so they didn't empathise with him when he was suffering, no matter how extreme. There was nothing there internally, no conscience, no empathy, to prompt restraint. The only limit they could have had was fear of external intervention, and they already knew they could talk rings around social services. If Preston was still alive, he's probably still be with them now.

I don't intend to idealise biological parents, because biological parents do abuse and kill their children. But any kind of emotional bond towards the child on the abusing adult's part will act as a brake on the adult's most violent impulses. The abuser will take a longer period to reach lethal levels of violence, or never reach that level at all. As we now know, JV had no brake and he exerted no limits on his rage. In fact, he seems to have wallowed in his rage.

Excellent analysis of how abusers offend, especially the anger at a very young child distressed after being sexually assaulted leading them to hurt him even more.

Swipe left for the next trending thread