and I don't care who is offended, there's no way a transwoman would be working in any facility where there are children ever, if I had any say in it. Too big a risk to take and while it might be a knee jerk reaction I don't care.
It's very tricky, not least because gender re-assignment is now a protected characteristic.
The issue is, of course, that for many men, if not most, identifying as transgender is because of a fetish.
The naivety of the government at the time not understanding that cross-dressing is a fetish. And yes, I know that it was billed almost as a disability. Certainly something that could not be helped. 'Gender dysphoria' covers a multitude of different motivations.
Plus, it's completely unverifiable.
And, as anyone on HR will tell you, yes of course you can discriminate, however illegal it is, there are millions of ways to do it.
But that just avoids the issue, sidesteps it. It doesn't address it.
Personally, I want it addressed. I want people in Parliament to acknowledge that yes, some of these men are fetishists. In the NHS, schools, the lot.
It's the bloody massive, great elephant in the room.
That, and that paraphilias cluster. So having one about women's clothes, doesn't mean don't have one about children. Quite the opposite, in fact, it's more likely.