Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

My complaint to the passport office and the response I received…

150 replies

PassportProblemo · 03/04/2026 13:16

So, I recently applied for a new UK passport. During the application process, I was asked for my “gender” and given the options “male” and “female”. At no point was I asked my sex. Assuming there was an error, I submitted the following complaint to the passport office:

"Hello,

I recently applied for a new passport as mine is nearing expiry.

As part of the application, I was asked to provide my "gender". The options offered were "female" and "male". As "male" and "female" refer to one's sex, I do not believe that this section is correct in asking for the applicant's gender.

Therefore, may I ask why you are using the term "gender" rather than "sex"? Also, do you plan on ever correcting this to avoid confusion to your customers?

Kind regards,"

During the complaints process, it asked if I would like my response via phone or writing. I requested writing.

Two days later, I received a phone call from the Passport Office… The woman said that the office is just following their internal guidance here, which says that this is what they should do. I asked for her response in writing. She sent me the following email:

“Dear PassportProblemo,

Thank you for your enquiry.

The passport application process is structured in accordance with The Gender Recognition Act 2004 which came into effect on 4 April 2005.

For more information on The Gender Recognition Act 2004 and how it applies to the passport application process please see the below link:

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7/contents

Yours sincerely,”

(I have removed the satisfaction survey link they included in their email)

Right, so what do we do next? How do we challenge their holy “internal guidance”?!?

OP posts:
dizzydizzydizzy · 03/04/2026 17:46

ScaryFaces · 03/04/2026 14:35

Honestly, this is such a spurious complaint and designed entirely to be spiteful towards trans people who apparently aren't allowed anything that would make their lives easier by the GC movement. It doesn't affect you in the slightest what other people's passports say, nor is it your business frankly. This isn't a feminist issue, it's just pure spite and throwing your toys out of the pram. You can't complain trans people out of existence.

I agree.

I think there are a small handful of situations where
sex and gender matters but this is not one of them. Nor does it impact on me what sex or gender another person has on their passport.

CelticSilver · 03/04/2026 17:47

Ever played Papers Please?

Jupiterx · 03/04/2026 17:47

So you got asked if you was a man or waman, now your causing a fuss for nothing.

dizzydizzydizzy · 03/04/2026 17:49

onlytherain · 03/04/2026 17:39

Shouldn't it be the opposite? Even if the photo shows someone who looks male, the sex marker should say female (or the other way around). This would determine eg. who this person can get searched by. Otherwise you could have a man posing as a woman getting searched by a female officer. How would you protect female officers from this?

Presumably the officer would not be alone in a room with some random or suspect?

RedTagAlan · 03/04/2026 17:50

Heggettypeg · 03/04/2026 17:37

The fact that there is an international standard for passports indicates that OP's query is not just quibbling.

It needs to be made absolutely clear just what information that field is supposed to capture.

"Gender" can mean, variously, "a polite synonym for one's sex", "how one identifies" and "how one presents", all of which could be out of alignment. It's not a clear term by itself.

Given that passports are now in common use as ID in all sorts of situations beyond the original context of travel, the people who need to know what a passport does and doesn't prove are far more numerous than just passport office employees and customs and immigration staff.

Some of those other situations - now or in the future (demanding sight of ID seems to be a growth area these days) - may require proof of sex. A lot of people won't realise that a passport is unfit for that purpose.

As someone up the thread pointed out, even something as apparently unrelated to passport control as an Olympic boxing contest can be affected.

I think it is quibbling. Just my opinion. Because the UK has to follow what the ISO/IEC standard says. And I don't know what it says, but the people who design the passports do.

I posted a link above to the relevant page of the standards shop above.

Not my lane really. I just know that passports have to be to an international standard, and I posted a link to where one of the parts of that standard can be found. That's all.

Waitwhat23 · 03/04/2026 17:50

I'm not venturing onto the hellsites which are Bluesky and Reddit but I'm guessing the bus has arrived from one of them?

GarlicFind · 03/04/2026 17:55

popery · 03/04/2026 16:58

But even as a more general question, not specific to me - does 'not having a gender identity' match, or not match, being female?

I would have expected there to be some acknowledgement of people that can't pinpoint a gender identity within themselves, or are they just excluded from this whole discussion?

Indeed. We don't exist! It's shocking, traumatising, etc. We are so vulnerable that we should start haranguing everyone at any level, throwing bottles of piss around and threatening to violently rape people who question our validity.

Or something like that.

popery · 03/04/2026 18:03

Sorry, something has just clicked, putting together the assumption that 'trans' generally means wanting to be the opposite sex, and dismissal of Stonewall language/definitions, plus using sex/gender more interchangeably than you might expect, I think I recognise one of these posters so I'm going to bow out - but genuinely hoping minds (in general!) can be open to those who are trying to do their best to work with definitions and how they apply to people who don't seem to fit the norms.

Just to comment on the gay/lesbian point - that's actually a decent analogy, except I don't think it's been applied properly here.

Most people who have reached adulthood know what 'sexual attraction' feels like, and therefore know themselves if they are sexually attracted to men, women, both, whatever. So they can look at the 'label' and the definition of that label to ascertain which they might be (while acknowledging that it's not necessarily fixed).

However, if you've never felt sexual attraction in your entire life, there is also a category for you - aromantic, or asexual, or a similar category.

You're not told:
'if you don't fancy the opposite sex then you're gay' and also
'if you don't fancy the same sex then you're straight'.

You have an option for 'not fancying either sex'. I don't know what the equivalent option is for people without a gender identity who are told if they're not cis they're trans and if they're not trans they're cis.

I hope some of this makes sense.

Chersfrozenface · 03/04/2026 18:08

It still seems odd that the form asks for 'Gender' when the passport itself says 'Sex/Sexe'.

My complaint to the passport office and the response I received…
Pingponghavoc · 03/04/2026 18:43

Chersfrozenface · 03/04/2026 17:22

The passport office said that a passport isn't proof of sex, that why they have always allowed cross dressing men to change the marker to female.
Any cross dresser can change the marker on their passport without doctors letters or a GRC.

Really?

"Gender change
Send one of the following when you apply for a passport:
a Gender Recognition Certificate
a new birth or adoption certificate showing your acquired gender
a letter from your doctor or medical consultant confirming your change of gender is likely to be permanent"

https://www.gov.uk/changing-passport-information/gender

That's the requirements for a change of gender not cross dressing.

Katypp · 03/04/2026 18:50

My grandmother's generation campaigned for the vote. My mother's generation campaigned for financial equaliy. My generation campaigned for equality in the workplace.
When i read nonsense like this, i think the fight for equality has been won and women are now scrabbling about trying to find things to justify their outrage.
Complete nonsense.

Pingponghavoc · 03/04/2026 18:55

Katypp · 03/04/2026 18:50

My grandmother's generation campaigned for the vote. My mother's generation campaigned for financial equaliy. My generation campaigned for equality in the workplace.
When i read nonsense like this, i think the fight for equality has been won and women are now scrabbling about trying to find things to justify their outrage.
Complete nonsense.

When the Olympic committee let men compete against women because of the marker on their passports, i dont think questioning the logic is utter nonsense.

Chersfrozenface · 03/04/2026 19:01

that why they have always allowed cross dressing men to change the marker to female.

Do you have an official source for that?

Chersfrozenface · 03/04/2026 19:02

that why they have always allowed cross dressing men to change the marker to female.

Do you have an official source for that?

RubyTrees · 03/04/2026 19:15

Underthinker · 03/04/2026 16:49

@ScaryFaces we don't have to work hard to make gender ideology make no sense, it is already pure nonsense through and through.

Simply but beautifully put!

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 03/04/2026 19:17

Love this, great reply from them.

Email equivalent of an eye roll! 🙄

Chersfrozenface · 03/04/2026 19:36

Any further news on how to change the Sex marker on one's passport from M to F or vice versa without following the steps described under 'Gender change' here?
https://www.gov.uk/changing-passport-information/gender

For instance, for cross dressing men?

And to reiterate, the marker appears under the heading 'Sex/Sexe', not 'Gender'.

GoldenGate · 03/04/2026 19:55

Newsflash. Some use "gender" as a synonym for your sex. Is it worth getting worked up about?

It then shows up on your passport as "Sex" so they must be thinking the same thing.

Indianajet · 03/04/2026 19:59

ScaryFaces · 03/04/2026 14:35

Honestly, this is such a spurious complaint and designed entirely to be spiteful towards trans people who apparently aren't allowed anything that would make their lives easier by the GC movement. It doesn't affect you in the slightest what other people's passports say, nor is it your business frankly. This isn't a feminist issue, it's just pure spite and throwing your toys out of the pram. You can't complain trans people out of existence.

This is so sensible!

Chersfrozenface · 03/04/2026 19:59

The Passport Office's reply says

"The passport application process is structured in accordance with The Gender Recognition Act 2004 which came into effect on 4 April 2005.

For more information on The Gender Recognition Act 2004 and how it applies to the passport application process please see the below link:"

I have searched the Act linked to on legislation.gov and there is no mention of 'passport' or 'passports' in it.

So what are they on about?

Chersfrozenface · 03/04/2026 20:04

Perhaps, @PassportProblemo, you could write back and ask the Passport Office staff if they could kindly give the details of the section/s or subsection/s of the GRA that deal with passport applications.

Pingponghavoc · 03/04/2026 20:09

Chersfrozenface · 03/04/2026 19:02

that why they have always allowed cross dressing men to change the marker to female.

Do you have an official source for that?

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/699ebeb9db2401de164d6cab/Gender_recognition_v29.0__clean_for_gov.uk_.pdf

Page 14.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/699ebeb9db2401de164d6cab/Gender_recognition_v29.0__clean_for_gov.uk_.pdf

ScaryFaces · 03/04/2026 20:13

popery · 03/04/2026 18:03

Sorry, something has just clicked, putting together the assumption that 'trans' generally means wanting to be the opposite sex, and dismissal of Stonewall language/definitions, plus using sex/gender more interchangeably than you might expect, I think I recognise one of these posters so I'm going to bow out - but genuinely hoping minds (in general!) can be open to those who are trying to do their best to work with definitions and how they apply to people who don't seem to fit the norms.

Just to comment on the gay/lesbian point - that's actually a decent analogy, except I don't think it's been applied properly here.

Most people who have reached adulthood know what 'sexual attraction' feels like, and therefore know themselves if they are sexually attracted to men, women, both, whatever. So they can look at the 'label' and the definition of that label to ascertain which they might be (while acknowledging that it's not necessarily fixed).

However, if you've never felt sexual attraction in your entire life, there is also a category for you - aromantic, or asexual, or a similar category.

You're not told:
'if you don't fancy the opposite sex then you're gay' and also
'if you don't fancy the same sex then you're straight'.

You have an option for 'not fancying either sex'. I don't know what the equivalent option is for people without a gender identity who are told if they're not cis they're trans and if they're not trans they're cis.

I hope some of this makes sense.

I think - once again - your sticking point here seems to comes back to your recurring assumption that someone else needs to come along and tell you if you're trans or cis. It feels at this point like you want me to try and prescribe an identity to you so you can then tell me off for being wrong about it and this will somehow "prove" that therefore all trans identities are invalid.

ScaryFaces · 03/04/2026 20:15

GarlicFind · 03/04/2026 17:55

Indeed. We don't exist! It's shocking, traumatising, etc. We are so vulnerable that we should start haranguing everyone at any level, throwing bottles of piss around and threatening to violently rape people who question our validity.

Or something like that.

Believe me, everyone is thoroughly aware you exist.

ScaryFaces · 03/04/2026 20:17

Waitwhat23 · 03/04/2026 17:43

avoids clunky constructions like talking about "non-trans women"

Women is the answer. Not a Latin prefix co-opted in 1994 by gender ideologists in an attempt to pretend that men are any kind of woman.

Not non men. Not cis women. Not whichever bullshit term is being peddled now.

Women.

Here we go with the compelled speech again.

Swipe left for the next trending thread