Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GLP are going after Sarah Phillimore and are going to lose - Part Two

537 replies

fromorbit · 01/04/2026 05:23

The Story so Far

Part 1

The first thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5400132-glp-are-going-after-sarah-philmore-and-are-going-to-lose?page=1

Get the popcorn folks. GLP is getting ready to lose again.

They are going after barrister Sarah Phillimore for referring to a man as a man. They think they are going to lawfare her into silence.

Her blog:
Here we are now: Entertain us
I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?
https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us?

The only thing is other TAs have already tried this on Phillimore multiple times.

They went to the Bar Council their claims were dismissed. They all failed. More to the point this ‘Kate’ is the same guy complaining again who already failed. Sarah Phillimore knows the law and likes explaining it to TAs and making them lose. So she doesn't even resent the attempt.

As Sarah has stated "They pick on someone who not only enjoys this but has now a vast repository of knowledge about the law in this area."

Part 2

So the Fox Basher decided to tell massive lies about Sarah Phillimore now he faces a defamation action.

GLP's case against Sarah rested on evidence from "Kate" and this turned out to be the infamous man in a dress Sophie Sparkles. A guy who was too obnoxious, chaotic and threatening even for the Scottish Greens to tolerate. Even for someone as incompetent as the Fox Basher this plan seemed particularly bad.

A band of helpful gardeners assembled and planted a lot of seeds and soon Sarah's garden was blooming.

Sarah assembled a huge dossier of evidence about Sparkles showing his instability. She carefully built up her case using her excellent legal skills.

After giving the Fox Basher plenty of time to apologise Sarah took action for defamation in December and her blog outlines the story so far nicely:

Letter before Action
I publish here my letter to Jolyon Maugham. There is no freedom of speech to tell harmful lies about others.

For the background to all of this, please see my response to the complaint of the Good Law Project which they made to the Bar Standards Board on August 26 2025. Shortly after this complaint, Mr Maugham chose to assert to his many followers online that I had ‘led a campaign of harassment’ so wicked that it led a trans identifying man to attempt suicide. I deal with that claim at some length in my response. It is not true.

I asked via email on 30 August 2025 for Maugham to delete, apologise and make a donation of £5K to For Women Scotland. His refusal came a few days later in a series of videos posted to TikTok and Instagram where he was clearly excited about the (false) idea that JK Rowling would be joining me in legal action against him. Being able to tell his followers that he faced attack by the Nasty Billionaire Transphobe would clearly have more cachet and would attract more funds to the Good Law Project than a much less sexy tussle with a junior provincial barrister.

I am sorry to disappoint Mr Maugham. It’s just me. Well me, and the so far 990 very generous people who have helped me raise the money to be able to even contemplate this kind of legal action. My grateful thanks to every one of them. I do not think that anyone has ‘freedom of speech’ to tell harmful lies about another person and certainly not a senior member of a regulated profession, who will rely on his status to give his words power and cause harm.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/letter-before-action

Now the Bar Standards Board has decided that Sarah has no case to answer and released a letter explaining how the GLP had failed again. Details here:

Right Here. Right Now.

Another stunning technical victory for the Good Law Project shows that sanity is being restored to the public debate about gender identity, slowly but ever so surely.

On 27 March 2026 I received the welcome and to be honest not entirely expected news that the Bar Standards Board was not going to investigate further the complaint of the Good Law Project against me on behalf of trans identifying man Euan Weddell, aka Sophie Molly/Sparkles.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/right-here-right-now

GLP are planning to release a statement which will no doubt spin what has happened as much as possible in its usual style.

Will the Fox Basher's long history of misogynistic hatred for any women who has knowledge about biology and legal incompetence come back to haunt him again?

If he is defeated it will be a warning to all TAs that this type of bigotry and massive lies are not going to be accepted legally in a country where women and men are legally equal.

Whatever happen's Sarah's bravery once again will pay a significant part in restoring a world in which discussing the reality of the existence of male and female human beings is accepted.

Her garden still needs more plants, and harvest so far has been excellent and you can keep watching this thread for more proof of that.

Letter before Action

I publish here my letter to Jolyon Maugham. There is no freedom of speech to tell harmful lies about others.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/letter-before-action

OP posts:
Thread gallery
55
AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 20/06/2026 13:03

Seems to be a games company of some sort. www.warchest.com/

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/06/2026 16:59

🤡

NotAtMyAge · 20/06/2026 18:29

Have just spent 10 minutes of my life I won't get back reading those two Reddit threads. Interesting to watch one knowledgeable poster, know as Quangocrat, patiently trying to correct the wild assumptions of most of the others. Someone who seems to know what they are talking about and who seems dubious as to whether JM has any chance of winning.

mardirousse · 20/06/2026 19:22

NotAtMyAge · 20/06/2026 18:29

Have just spent 10 minutes of my life I won't get back reading those two Reddit threads. Interesting to watch one knowledgeable poster, know as Quangocrat, patiently trying to correct the wild assumptions of most of the others. Someone who seems to know what they are talking about and who seems dubious as to whether JM has any chance of winning.

Quangocrat is Protect the Dollz's new account,

NotAtMyAge · 20/06/2026 19:54

mardirousse · 20/06/2026 19:22

Quangocrat is Protect the Dollz's new account,

Thanks. I did wonder. He really is the only one who has a decent grasp of the law and can express himself logically. It doesn't always make him popular.

anyolddinosaur · 20/06/2026 20:33

Reddit is not generally a place noted for its intelligence and the trans threads, unsurprisingly, show a poor grasp of reality.

Hedgehogforshort · 20/06/2026 21:04

To be fair i have seen plenty of posts on the court case threads where peoples observations are well uninformed.

the one that comes to mind being “i thought common law did not exist”. Based on an understanding of aw marriage.

Wat made me laugh was reference to the Grainger test and JM being able to somehow force disclosures of her phone and internet activity.

As we know (for the benefit of TRA lurkers)

JM has claimed she harassed and harangued Kate, and that as a direct result of her actions, Kate attempted suicide.

Which would be an unlikely conclusion of the Court from what i understand.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/06/2026 01:14

That poster seems to think that because she’s said she is not receiving funding from JKR there is grounds for that to be checked by disclosure of her phone, bank records etc.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 21/06/2026 13:55

The obsession with how Evil Rowling is Persecuting Trans People is so much part of the cult belief that it is hardly strange when it's assumed she must be involved whenever anything to do with trans people is mentioned, though.

I am at a loss to understand how helping those women who cannot afford to do so, to defend themselves, has been transmuted into persecuting trans people, but it is. By habit, I suspect.

OP posts:
BiologicalRobot · Yesterday 09:47

Stolen from your other post.
The press should note that columnists are at liberty to call Euan a "bloke", a "lunatic", and "Mr Molly".

😱

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread