Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GLP are going after Sarah Phillimore and are going to lose - Part Two

332 replies

fromorbit · 01/04/2026 05:23

The Story so Far

Part 1

The first thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5400132-glp-are-going-after-sarah-philmore-and-are-going-to-lose?page=1

Get the popcorn folks. GLP is getting ready to lose again.

They are going after barrister Sarah Phillimore for referring to a man as a man. They think they are going to lawfare her into silence.

Her blog:
Here we are now: Entertain us
I have had now 7 years and counting of the various tactics used to 'silence' those who won't comply with prevailing orthodoxy. How are those tactics holding up?
https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/here-we-are-now-entertain-us?

The only thing is other TAs have already tried this on Phillimore multiple times.

They went to the Bar Council their claims were dismissed. They all failed. More to the point this ‘Kate’ is the same guy complaining again who already failed. Sarah Phillimore knows the law and likes explaining it to TAs and making them lose. So she doesn't even resent the attempt.

As Sarah has stated "They pick on someone who not only enjoys this but has now a vast repository of knowledge about the law in this area."

Part 2

So the Fox Basher decided to tell massive lies about Sarah Phillimore now he faces a defamation action.

GLP's case against Sarah rested on evidence from "Kate" and this turned out to be the infamous man in a dress Sophie Sparkles. A guy who was too obnoxious, chaotic and threatening even for the Scottish Greens to tolerate. Even for someone as incompetent as the Fox Basher this plan seemed particularly bad.

A band of helpful gardeners assembled and planted a lot of seeds and soon Sarah's garden was blooming.

Sarah assembled a huge dossier of evidence about Sparkles showing his instability. She carefully built up her case using her excellent legal skills.

After giving the Fox Basher plenty of time to apologise Sarah took action for defamation in December and her blog outlines the story so far nicely:

Letter before Action
I publish here my letter to Jolyon Maugham. There is no freedom of speech to tell harmful lies about others.

For the background to all of this, please see my response to the complaint of the Good Law Project which they made to the Bar Standards Board on August 26 2025. Shortly after this complaint, Mr Maugham chose to assert to his many followers online that I had ‘led a campaign of harassment’ so wicked that it led a trans identifying man to attempt suicide. I deal with that claim at some length in my response. It is not true.

I asked via email on 30 August 2025 for Maugham to delete, apologise and make a donation of £5K to For Women Scotland. His refusal came a few days later in a series of videos posted to TikTok and Instagram where he was clearly excited about the (false) idea that JK Rowling would be joining me in legal action against him. Being able to tell his followers that he faced attack by the Nasty Billionaire Transphobe would clearly have more cachet and would attract more funds to the Good Law Project than a much less sexy tussle with a junior provincial barrister.

I am sorry to disappoint Mr Maugham. It’s just me. Well me, and the so far 990 very generous people who have helped me raise the money to be able to even contemplate this kind of legal action. My grateful thanks to every one of them. I do not think that anyone has ‘freedom of speech’ to tell harmful lies about another person and certainly not a senior member of a regulated profession, who will rely on his status to give his words power and cause harm.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/letter-before-action

Now the Bar Standards Board has decided that Sarah has no case to answer and released a letter explaining how the GLP had failed again. Details here:

Right Here. Right Now.

Another stunning technical victory for the Good Law Project shows that sanity is being restored to the public debate about gender identity, slowly but ever so surely.

On 27 March 2026 I received the welcome and to be honest not entirely expected news that the Bar Standards Board was not going to investigate further the complaint of the Good Law Project against me on behalf of trans identifying man Euan Weddell, aka Sophie Molly/Sparkles.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/right-here-right-now

GLP are planning to release a statement which will no doubt spin what has happened as much as possible in its usual style.

Will the Fox Basher's long history of misogynistic hatred for any women who has knowledge about biology and legal incompetence come back to haunt him again?

If he is defeated it will be a warning to all TAs that this type of bigotry and massive lies are not going to be accepted legally in a country where women and men are legally equal.

Whatever happen's Sarah's bravery once again will pay a significant part in restoring a world in which discussing the reality of the existence of male and female human beings is accepted.

Her garden still needs more plants, and harvest so far has been excellent and you can keep watching this thread for more proof of that.

Letter before Action

I publish here my letter to Jolyon Maugham. There is no freedom of speech to tell harmful lies about others.

https://sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/letter-before-action

OP posts:
Thread gallery
46
BiologicalRobot · 10/05/2026 12:39

It's going to end up as another "It's not what she said, it's how she said it", isn't it? 🙄

EmpressDomesticatednottamed · 10/05/2026 12:46

Deanefan · 10/05/2026 07:32

Whenever I try and click on a bitter link I just get a blank screen. Any top tips please?

You are not alone, this happens on my not really up to date but definitely not ancient iphone.
The ancient phone worked ok and it works fine on the ancient macbook with a bit of persistence.
I'm not saying the age of the device has anything to do with it, haven't a clue, just an observation 🙂

SabrinaThwaite · 10/05/2026 12:58

Advertising the GLP fighting fund on the page announcing its going to challenge the BSB?

Gotta keep the grift going.

SidewaysOtter · 10/05/2026 13:22

I used to deal with appeals on decisions and sometimes the appeal grounds were just wild; a case of 'let's throw absolutely everything at this and see if anything whatsoever even vaguely sticks'.

Reading that letter, I just can't imagine why this has come to mind.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 10/05/2026 16:26

EmpressDomesticatednottamed · 10/05/2026 12:46

You are not alone, this happens on my not really up to date but definitely not ancient iphone.
The ancient phone worked ok and it works fine on the ancient macbook with a bit of persistence.
I'm not saying the age of the device has anything to do with it, haven't a clue, just an observation 🙂

Edited

I don't have trouble using nitter.poast.org rather than anything else, to replace x.com. There have been other nitter possibilities that haven't worked on this machine.

ArabellaScott · Today 15:19

'The Good Law Project - currently embroiled in a dingdong with the Bar Standards Board over its response to a complaint about a family practitioner - is approaching its tenth birthday. What better way to celebrate than by a change of corporate status?
Under the headline 'Our ownership structure is changing', the crowd-funded outfit announces that founder Jolyon Maugham KC (pictured) has handed over ownership to a vehicle in Jersey.

No, it's not what you think: 'Good Law Project will remain UK resident for tax purposes and there will be no change to how its income is taxed,' the announcement stresses. Rather, the idea is to replicate the characteristics of charity status without being bound by the 'moving political guardrails policed by the Charity Commission'.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page