Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #56

1000 replies

nauticant · 08/12/2025 13:52

Judgment was handed down on 8 December 2025:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6936ce28a6fc97b81e57436a/S_Peggie_v_Fife_Health_Board__Dr_Upton.pdf

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence was 29 July 2025. It resumed again over 1 to 2 September for closing submissions.
The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February 2025. Sandie Peggie returned to give more evidence on 29 July 2025.

Access to view the second part of the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to: [email protected]

The hearing was live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #50 can be found in this thread: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5379717-sandie-peggie-list-of-threads-covering-employment-tribunal-and-afterwards

Thread 51: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5402652-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-51 1 September 2025 to 2 September 2025
Thread 52: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5403218-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-52 2 September 2025 to 4 September 2025
Thread 53: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5404208-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-53 3 September to 1 October 2025
Thread 54: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5418690-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-54 from 28 September 2025
Thread 55: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5447019-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-55

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 21:51

AMansAManForAllThat · 08/12/2025 21:49

Why are you describing them as sexual comments about your person?
You are talking about mixed sex changing rooms, where women get undressed in front of men. Pointing out that that is what you are promoting is not a sexual comment about you.

The poster said "I like to get undressed in front of men".

Im not going to argue about it anymore. Please respect boundaries by not making this personal.

Thanks.

AMansAManForAllThat · 08/12/2025 21:51

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 21:50

Yes if DU had gone up to SP and said "I get it you like to get undressed in front of trans women" that would have 100% been sexual harassment and she would not have won her case.

Its completely different to her simply using the changing room as she was allowed to do by her employer: hence she was cleared of harassment.

Edited

It’s about a woman - all the women- being asked to undress in front of a man.

Alpacajigsaw · 08/12/2025 21:53

HackneyMum1 · 08/12/2025 21:41

That doesn’t answer the question - what evidence was there that Dr Upton in particular caused any kind of reasonable threat to other women? There isn’t any, is there?

But that doesn’t matter
My elderly dad wouldn’t pose a danger in a women’s changing room but he still shouldn’t be there
because privacy and dignity are considerations too
and because he’s male
same as dr Upton is male, so said the Tribunal
being a so called trans woman is an irrelevance

tell me Hackneymum why do you care more about male rights than women’s rights?

MyAmpleSheep · 08/12/2025 21:53

HackneyMum1 · 08/12/2025 21:41

That doesn’t answer the question - what evidence was there that Dr Upton in particular caused any kind of reasonable threat to other women? There isn’t any, is there?

As a second point, by entering the women's changing room, DU has already excluded himself from the class of men who don't assault or harrass women in women's changing rooms.

By doing so he increases his risk profile enormously.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 08/12/2025 21:54

Pity that Upton doesn’t believe in respecting boundaries.

JanesLittleGirl · 08/12/2025 21:54

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 19:33

Saying a man looks like a man is not hurtful

It is profoundly hurtful to the person who is the object of your comments.

You don't have the power to control the emotional experience of others I'm afraid.

But apparently Dr. Upton (male by any legal definition) can ignore the obviously hurtful loss of privacy and dignity of a woman who needs to clean up after significant bleeding. I think that you are leaving your thumb on the balance and not in a good way.

usernameinserthere · 08/12/2025 21:54

idrinkwineandiknitthings · 08/12/2025 16:38

I can’t remember if it was in one of Michael Foran’s podcasts or if he was relaying one of NC’s arguments. But for the Workplace regulations to not refer to biological sex in 1992, that would require an interpretation that somehow the law applied on a self ID basis at that time. But the GRC act only came into being in 2014 and there were a number of court cases in the 90s and early 2000s that were about arguing a person’s ability to change their sex that wouldn’t have occurred if self id was a thing.

I’m sure Michael Foran’s thoughts on the judgement will be interesting

Yes - the back to the future Time Machine can’t help them.

A recent mass delusion doesn’t make it make sense in 1992. Men are biological men under the act.

MarieDeGournay · 08/12/2025 21:55

usedtobeaylis · 08/12/2025 21:44

How the hell have we gone back two years the primary consideration being 'threat'?

Quite! We shouldn't have to prove that men are a threat in women's spaces, just that they are men in women's spaces.

It doesn't matter if a man is the nicest man in the whole world , he doesn't belong in women's toilets - the irony is that the nicest men in the world wouldn't dream of going into the women's toilets, and until the trans juggernaut rolled into town, 'the good men stayed out so the bad men stood out'.

Kucinghitam · 08/12/2025 21:55

I find the "threat" thing so squirrelly look-over-there disingenuous. I am very confident that my 90+ year old FiL isn't a sexual threat to me, nor is my gay colleague, nor my middle-aged next-door neighbour who likes gardening. I still don't think any of them belong in the female changing room. Because female humans deserve - in addition to safety - privacy, dignity and freedom from the male gaze. That includes less-than-angelic female humans like Sandie.

EmmyFr · 08/12/2025 21:55

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 21:51

The poster said "I like to get undressed in front of men".

Im not going to argue about it anymore. Please respect boundaries by not making this personal.

Thanks.

You don't mind undressing in front of men (note I didn't say "like") when they identify as women. It's absolutely your right.

I do.

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 21:56

AMansAManForAllThat · 08/12/2025 21:51

Saying he’s a man is not picking apart his appearance. He’s a man and he looks like a man. We have seen him. It just isn’t a personal criticism. It’s a statement of fact.

Again, it was far more than a simple observation that "he is a man". It was scrutinising/ analysing parts of her appearance

HackneyMum1 · 08/12/2025 21:57

Alpacajigsaw · 08/12/2025 21:53

But that doesn’t matter
My elderly dad wouldn’t pose a danger in a women’s changing room but he still shouldn’t be there
because privacy and dignity are considerations too
and because he’s male
same as dr Upton is male, so said the Tribunal
being a so called trans woman is an irrelevance

tell me Hackneymum why do you care more about male rights than women’s rights?

It might be hard for you to compute but it is possible to care about the rights of a small persecuted minority (trans rights) AND women’s rights at the same time. Doesn’t mean I’m putting men above women in any way.

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 21:57

EmmyFr · 08/12/2025 21:55

You don't mind undressing in front of men (note I didn't say "like") when they identify as women. It's absolutely your right.

I do.

Please respect boundaries and stop talking about my personal preferences when I get undressed.

moto748e · 08/12/2025 21:58

MrsOvertonsWindow · 08/12/2025 21:31

As I listened I did wonder whether we'd be in such mess if the BBC had accurately reported the issues instead of obeying commands to call men women and to pretend that AGP / fetish etc didn't exist when reporting all the murder / sex offending cases that have gone through the courts.

So true. If the BBC had been accurate, starting years ago, we'd be in a completely different place. They bear quite a responsibility.

usernameinserthere · 08/12/2025 21:58

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 21:51

The poster said "I like to get undressed in front of men".

Im not going to argue about it anymore. Please respect boundaries by not making this personal.

Thanks.

Well this judgement makes it personal.

You are now a woman who is happy to strip to her knickers in front of men.

Or you engage your Article 8 rights and get a space where you don’t have to strip to your knickers in front of men.

You are group A. Your preference is to get undressed with men.

Almost everyone else on here is B.

EJ Kemp made it personal for all women.

Sorry you’ve been sexually harassed by the Judge in the Peggie case. That sucks for you.

HackneyMum1 · 08/12/2025 21:59

Arran2024 · 08/12/2025 21:45

He is a man and we exclude men for several reasons, one being the disproportionate number of violent crime carried out by men on women. The tribunal suggested this isnt the case, that it's simply a point of view, which is pretty astonishing imo.

What percentage of the “men” committing crimes against women are trans women? Asking for a friend.

FallenSloppyDead2 · 08/12/2025 22:00

moto748e · 08/12/2025 21:58

So true. If the BBC had been accurate, starting years ago, we'd be in a completely different place. They bear quite a responsibility.

Agreed, and blood on their hands for pushing 'gender affirming care' to children

guinnessguzzler · 08/12/2025 22:00

I honestly cannot believe this. Been busy with family stuff so only just seen it. Unbelievable. Will go back and catch up now.

Kucinghitam · 08/12/2025 22:00

How can we tell which people deserve to have their boundaries respected when merely discussing getting undressed, and which people don't get to have their boundaries respected when they actually have to get undressed in the actual real world?

🤔

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 22:00

usernameinserthere · 08/12/2025 21:58

Well this judgement makes it personal.

You are now a woman who is happy to strip to her knickers in front of men.

Or you engage your Article 8 rights and get a space where you don’t have to strip to your knickers in front of men.

You are group A. Your preference is to get undressed with men.

Almost everyone else on here is B.

EJ Kemp made it personal for all women.

Sorry you’ve been sexually harassed by the Judge in the Peggie case. That sucks for you.

*You are now a woman who is happy to strip to her knickers in front of men.

You are group A. Your preference is to get undressed with men.*

Stop. We can discuss this case without you doing this.

SionnachRuadh · 08/12/2025 22:02

Kucinghitam · 08/12/2025 22:00

How can we tell which people deserve to have their boundaries respected when merely discussing getting undressed, and which people don't get to have their boundaries respected when they actually have to get undressed in the actual real world?

🤔

I don't like to jump to conclusions, but I suspect the answer is that men who are sad about having to use the gents have absolute priority.

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 22:02

Kucinghitam · 08/12/2025 22:00

How can we tell which people deserve to have their boundaries respected when merely discussing getting undressed, and which people don't get to have their boundaries respected when they actually have to get undressed in the actual real world?

🤔

We can discuss changing room facilities , just stop making things pointed and personal

Why is that hard for
you to understand?

Boiledbeetle · 08/12/2025 22:03

puppymaddness · 08/12/2025 21:50

Yes if DU had gone up to SP and said "I get it you like to get undressed in front of trans women" that would have 100% been sexual harassment and she would not have won her case.

Its completely different to her simply using the changing room as she was allowed to do by her employer: hence she was cleared of harassment.

Edited

It's about men using the women's changing room. You either fall into one of two camps.

Camp 1 I am NOT happy for men, any men, to be in the women's changing rooms, and I am NOT happy to undress in front of men in the women's changing room.

Or

Camp 2 I am happy for all men, because if you let some in you actually let them all in, to be in the women's changing room and I'm happy to undress in front of men in the women's changing room.

You are in camp 2. That's fine. But at least own what you are advocating for.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 08/12/2025 22:04

HackneyMum1 · 08/12/2025 21:59

What percentage of the “men” committing crimes against women are trans women? Asking for a friend.

My AI says:
Direct answer: There are currently no official UK statistics that provide a percentage of crimes against women committed specifically by trans women. The Ministry of Justice and Office for National Statistics do not publish offender data broken down by gender identity. Available evidence suggests that trans women offenders are recorded within broader male categories, but the proportion is unknown and not separately reported

Maybe it's time the MoJ started collecting the stats, of course they would first have to admit now many men are in women's prisons first.

MyAmpleSheep · 08/12/2025 22:04

HackneyMum1 · 08/12/2025 21:41

That doesn’t answer the question - what evidence was there that Dr Upton in particular caused any kind of reasonable threat to other women? There isn’t any, is there?

Beth Upton is an NHS doctor who has chosen to spend her life saving lives and serving the NHS.

As a third point, the fact that he's a doctor and decided to devote his career is entirely irrelevant.

Doctors are expected to follow rules, just like anyone else, and the world is full of criminal doctors who while easily described (as you do) as angels, abuse their position to cause great harm. The same is true for nurses, priests and teachers, all of whom some people choose to lionize.

If choosing to follow a traditional 'caring' career was evidence of good intent then we would never need to vet teacher, scout and guide leaders, nurses or anyone else.

Please re-think your approach to risk evaluation, which really isn't much removed from "not my nigel".

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.