Webberley vs Gold

[RachelFanshawe]

Another interview where she comes across as an evil lunatic and it’s clear the interviewer is viscerally repulsed by her no doubt.

I haven’t watched it - not sure it’s available yet - but I usually find Andrew Gold a decent interviewer.

Oh, and often I'd be sympathetic when someone does this, but it was hilarious when Robby said he'd pray for her!

I worry even writing this as Webberly could read it and be even more emboldened to put all her eggs in the American basket.

I wonder if she has any other baskets to choose from. It may be that the countries she has been operating from are tightening their prescribing rules to an extent that she can longer operate from that country.

She had planned to provide puberty blockers via Northern Ireland until they changed their rules.

@GarlicHound I came to comment but you have beaten me with the exact same thoughts. 😎

The interviewer has the measure of slippery HW and her techniques. V fun to watch HW deranged logic. It is still enraging but so good to see her reveal her (and husband’s) limited grasp of reality.

The fact that she doesn't seem to have felt that a Commonwealth country might have need of her services gives me some optimism re Australia & NZ. Sadly, she still has too many competitors in Canada.

”What makes you a woman?"
"Well, I just am! I don't know how, I just know."

That reminds me of an article I read which first got me questioning the nonsense of this movement over a decade ago. It was a female journalist saying she didn’t know what made her a woman but she just knew that she was one and she ended it with saying “and that’s ok” . I just remembered thinking, no that’s not ok, that’s lunacy 😂

The Starbuck interview 11 min in

. 8 m transgender people° in the USA
× £195 her sign up fee

Her target is a market worth a minimum of
£1,560,000,000

° (she may be counting the dangly penis type people only)

Plus a £165 "consultation fee"
Plus £30 per month subs from a life long client
Plus other commissions from upselling services

Loooooooooads on cash in play if she can get a team of US medics willing to provide access to the drugs for her core busuness.

On language from memory of prior interviews she would have used the word woman rather than "female".

The slogan is TWAW not TFAF.

Plus with in the context of cultures "female" in both UK and USA English is an subtle insult as the natural pattern while speaking is to say woman. While her medical training would focus on correctly sexing a male as a male.

And her animation her eyes and face movements reflect the amount of energy she is putting into selecting words to match her message

Honestly I think It's all about the money.

I think she cares as much about childrenwith gender dysphoria as Michelle Mone cares about PPE.

I'm watching the Gold interview now and she is definitely being so polite to him in stark comparison to her sneering behaviour towards Bindel and Joyce.

I've never come across people who can tell untruths with a lack of inhibition, and recklessness, in the way that people like Webberley (and the TRAs we get posting on FWR) do. I'm not used to this level of dissembling from people just to get their own way.

The Starbuck interview is the worst one yet I think. It started off with her psychopathic denial of reality 'i didn't call anyone a bigot, when, oh it's not in front of me, oh well if you say so, who is riley gaines, i have never heard of her' it is enraging how she uses words to try to deny reality in this way. Then laughing at rape victims, calling Starbuck's arguments "bollocks", flirting with him and saying he would go down well in a gay bar - how does she know - does she speak for gay men now too? Does she hang out in gay bars then? The aggression, the fawning and flirting, the repetition of the same tired phrases over and over again, the way she is absolutely unable to see another person's perspective, it is wildly deranged and embarrassing. Interestingly i also looked up gendergp on trust pilot and it had some really bad reviews saying that the initial consultation is very caring and supportive but then it is all done by ai and it 's impossible to speak to a real person without paying for another appointment which is difficult to arrange anyway. Even adjusting an incorrect prescription (ie a mistake made by gender gp) all has to be paid for on top of the subscription fee. The subscription fee doesn't cover anything except access to the organisation. Some reviews went so far as to call it a scam organisation. Hopefully it will be one of her disgruntled patients that eventually makes a complaint that gets it shut down.

'The subscription fee doesn't cover anything except access to the organisation.' I looked at it yesterday and thought exactly the same thing

I have a friend who’d kid tried to trans. One of the reasons my friend peaked was rge GGP business model - she said it was a scam for desperate people.

the other reasons my friend peaked was because I told her all the stuff I’d learned here. Thanks, MN!