Helen Webberley interviewed

[ArabellaSaurus]

And is asked the hard questions. At last.

https://x.com/GBNEWS/status/1990243838456156255

I want every person who has ever defended prescribing puberty blockers to children to watch that interview.

I'm trying to find it on Nitter, but failing so far. Any tips?

So GenderGP is moving/expanding into the US.

I see.

I wondered what was next, seeing as it had apparently ceased to trade in the UK.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10323493

Dissolved in August.

I just posted this on the Joyce vs Webberley thread.

Her audience is not people who are never going to believe her. Her audience is the people who already believe her and want to get a supply of puberty blockers.

She is directly appealing to them. That whole ‘debate’ will has been styled to get new customers from
around the world. I am sure that there are many applauding her for mastery over a far right wing media presenter.

She stayed on target. The WPATH leak was made up, the ‘where’s the proof about lack of sexual function?’, the ‘puberty blockers lead to better sexual function because people feel better about themselves’, the whole bit about affirming children because they are just exploring and that is where adults with transgender identities develop from, the assertion that anorexia treatment is nothing like that for gender, the best time to start puberty blockers is when puberty is starting even if that is 8 years old.

She repeated all the points that extreme transgender activists believe. And she got to do it on international platforms. All while not storming out, or looking anything but relatively calmly righteous.

She just used the right terminology all the way through to put Ben into the ‘you are unkind’ position that her audience already believes he is. While looking like she was being attacked and called ‘evil’ for standing up for those whole need her.

She even pointed out that such discussion ‘made trans people vulnerable’ with the implication that Ben has made people vulnerable now.

I reckon that interview on GB News will be considered a significant ‘win’ by her and her team. She has just been sold as a saviour for supply of gender affirming hormones.

Wow. He was absolutely fantastic. Why does she do interviews?!

'GenderGP © 2025 is owned by GenderGP PTE Limited. Please note that GenderGP does not provide any services in Singapore'

'These Terms and Conditions and your use of this website are governed by Singapore law. Any disputes arising out of these Terms and Conditions shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Singapore courts.'

from GenderGP.com

This UK company seems affiliated:

find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09315897/filing-history

Really?!

She's just talking such obvious nonsense. Doesn't the history of her and her husband's serious failings have any impact at all?

And the obviousness that she is making a lot of money out of the grift?

One may smile and smile and still be a villain.

That was a remarkable interview. She comes across as someone deeply indoctrinated.

And she declares that a female who identifies as a man is male. She uses complete obfuscating language. And she then admonishes Ben for being disrespectful, cruel and unkind.

Fuck. It is like she is the leading light example for all those posters using those words respect and kindness to censure and educate people on FWR threads about respecting TWAW and people’s identities.

If you have doctors like Webberly saying a female person is ‘male’ now, where does the boundary around language stop. Where do those who say, I will use some female language for a male person but not others stop? At their personally defined boundary that still creates barriers for clear communication?

It really becomes clear when watching this interview that when everyone has their own boundaries around communication and it is not universally understood, what is meant when and by whom, how do we expect to be able to protect the rights and needs of women and girls?

I really think that with language, it is not harmless to use female language for male people and vice versa. I don’t understand how some people think there is a kind moderate approach here.

Even just the fucking pointy finger should be a tell, tbh.

Never been sure how much Webberley believes of her wildly impossible statements (transgender men are born male, but with wombs) and how much is just about the money.

She manages to be coherent in her twisted logic. I can see how she has got away with hoodwinking people for years.

The fitness to practice of a doctor who ran an online clinic for transgender children is impaired by a "serious misconduct", a medical tribunal has found.
Dr Helen Webberley put patients at "unwarranted risk of harm" by failing to provide follow-up care in 2016.
Two patients, 12 and 17, were prescribed testosterone.
The tribunal said it was satisfied that Dr Webberley would implement changes if she returned to practice.
The founder of the website GenderGP was accused of failing to provide good clinical care to three patients transitioning from female to male.
In April, a Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service panel found 36 allegations to be proved, but 83 others were not.
Transgender services GP fined £12,000
GP ran unregistered online trans clinic
GP gave child, 12, gender-change hormones
The tribunal, chaired by Angus Macpherson, found Dr Webberley's actions amounted to serious misconduct in failing to provide adequate follow-up care to a 12 and 17-year-old.
In its findings, the panel said it was satisfied Dr Webberley had since "obtained insight" and would implement changes if she returned to practice.
Transgender care GP's fitness to practice impaired, tribunal finds - BBC News

She brushed them away very confidentially. To the audience she is appealing to, they want that brushed away. They want to believe it was just cleared up by the court and it was all an administrative issue only.

Don’t forget, to the audience they WANT a quick and very easy path to access those hormones that their bubble is saying they should access and access immediately. They don’t want any counselling or protracted process.

They have just heard her say it is an administrative thing that the courts cleared up. She is the victim of her philanthropic nature being attacked by hateful bigots.

https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1357

'A retired consultant gastroenterologist has been struck off the UK medical register for “wide ranging failings” in treating young transgender patients and in prescribing testosterone for men.
Michael Webberley, who was charged with failing to provide good care to 24 patients, acted outside the limits of his expertise, a medical practitioners tribunal concluded.
Through the private online clinic GenderGP, which he ran with his wife Helen, a GP, Webberley prescribed puberty blockers to a child of nine and cross sex hormones to a teenager who died by suicide a few months later.
He faced charges over his care of seven transgender patients, and the tribunal found that he had provided treatment that was not clinically indicated or that had been prescribed without adequate tests, assessments, or examinations.'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-61999764

'A doctor who ran an online clinic for transgender children has been suspended from practising for two months by a medical tribunal.
Dr Helen Webberley put three patients at "unwarranted risk of harm" by failing to provide good clinical care.
The patients, aged 11, 12 and 17, were transitioning from female to male.
The tribunal found her fitness to practise was also impaired by reason of a 2018 conviction for running an unregistered medical agency.
Dr Webberley, from Abergavenny, Monmouthshire, founded the website GenderGP in 2015 as a private online service for transgender care, treating thousands of patients, she said, because of long NHS waiting times.
The tribunal, chaired by Angus Macpherson, found "serious misconduct" for her failure to follow up with 12 and 17-year-olds who had been prescribed testosterone.

It said Dr Webberley also failed an 11-year-old by not discussing risks to fertility at a consultation before prescribing puberty blockers.'

She a raving lunatic isn't she.

https://iclg.com/news/21123-former-nurse-in-battle-with-offshore-clinic-over-unfair-dismissal

'A former nurse is embroiled in a legal dispute with an offshore gender clinic
tribunal win and the subsequent failure of the respondent to settle a substantial compensation award. Dolly Osborne, a 44-year-old woman with a complex medical history including post-traumatic stress disorder, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, was compelled to leave her nursing career due to ill health but, despite her challenges, she was eager to return to the profession and found herself drawn to the opportunity to support transgender patients.
ALGORITHMIC TREATMENT
Osborne applied for a position at GenderGP, a Singapore-registered clinic headed by Dr Helen Webberley who last week had her licence revoked by the UK General Medical Council. The clinic has garnered significant attention and controversy for its practices, including the provision of puberty blockers to children as young as eight and its reliance on algorithmic treatment recommendations for gender dysphoria patients.
Osborne accepted a part-time, remote role as a nurse conducting video consultations. However, her employment was abruptly terminated following an incident during her online induction. While reviewing internal policy documents, Osborne corrected several spelling errors. Concerned about potential misunderstandings, she informed her colleagues of the changes but this action inadvertently triggered a hostile response from a senior staff member, who accused her of inappropriate behaviour.
The following day, Osborne was informed that her employment contract had been terminated. The clinic cited her correction of the document and her emotional state as reasons for dismissal. Osborne maintains that her actions were merely an attempt to be helpful and that her emotional response was due to the shock of the situation.
DISABILITY HARASSMENT
Despite winning her case at an employment tribunal in April last year and being awarded GBP 84,599 in compensation by Employment Judge Brian McCluggage for discrimination and harassment relating to the claimant’s disability, Osborne has been unable to recover any of the money. GenderGP has completely ignored the tribunal’s ruling and has made no attempt to fulfil its financial obligation.
The clinic’s failure to respond to legal proceedings has raised serious concerns about the accountability of offshore health care providers and the protection of patient rights, with Osborne’s case highlighting the considerable challenges individuals face when seeking justice against companies operating overseas.
Osborne has spoken publicly about the devastating emotional and financial toll of the ordeal, and her determination to hold GenderGP accountable.'

That was the messaging I got watching her on this interview that she is definitely in it for the money. But that she will also believe in it too because she can tamp down on any misgivings because after all, she is only giving distressed patients treatments they want.

Or she is a complete sociopath and can lie incredibly well to make money.

I don’t think I will ever work out which or if it isn’t both.

I do find it very hard to understand anyone who can agree with what she says or think that she's telling the truth or altruistic.

It seems so very, very obvious to me that there are serious issues there, and that she is not to be trusted. Even just the body language. Isn't it clear?

And the hands up to stop him talking.

And the ‘I am educating you’.

Fuck that. It is a debate, a discussion, not a lecture. Lecture implies authority. But then again she is admitting that her communications are only to be educational. Never to explore facts to find what might be reality and what might be misrepresentation or misinformation.

Yes. Of course it is clear. … to us.

But if you have been told all those things from others and not bothered to fact check and do your own research, she has played directly to her audience. Everything she did in that interview can be explained by her defending herself and her honour from a far right media presenter.

Somewhere, probably on blue sky she will be being applauded.

I watched in horror and thought this is a great video for Operation: Let them speak. To me, and you, it was a bonkers interview.

But remember, we have had posters post complete crap from people who they feel are influential that hit the same points that Webberley has. And they think they have hit the jackpot in strong arguments. We look at the articles and think, that is just babbling nonsense.

https://www.transgendertrend.com/president-of-the-family-division-issues-warning-against-gendergp/

More on patient, 'J'. Poor kid.

'The evidence presented in the judgment of this case is highly disturbing. The teenager at the centre of the case fits the picture of one of the most vulnerable cohorts identified in the Cass Review, a girl with significant mental health issues who began to identify as a boy at age 12:
Since 2020, he has been diagnosed with anorexia and autistic spectrum disorder. There have been bouts of self-harming and, in September 2021, J was detained under the Mental Health Act 1983, for treatment pursuant to s 3 for 9 months. As a consequence of his difficulties, J did not attend mainstream schooling in 2021 and 2022 but returned to school in early 2023.
The revelation that GenderGP thought it appropriate to prescribe testosterone to a child experiencing such severe mental health problems should be cause for urgent investigation. But what is truly horrific is that this decision was made based only on a self-completed online form and an online consultation (described as ‘extremely poor quality’ in the judgment) with a counsellor who is not registered with the Health and Care Professions Council regulator.
There was no medical examination, blood testing or other clinical evaluation and Child J had not had any direct communication with a doctor at any stage during the referral to GenderGP.'

''Dr Hewitt’s principal criticism of Gender GP’s intervention, however, relates to the dose of testosterone that was prescribed. She explained that the dosage of intra-muscular injection of testosterone [Nebido] at 1000mg/4ml every 6 weeks was at the level that one would administer to an adult only after a course of treatment that would have started at a much lower dose but built up to 1000mg/4ml over the course of two or three years.

Not only did Gender GP prescribe this top-end dosage to a testosterone-naïve child, but they did so by directing a ‘loading’ (double) dose at the commencement of the treatment. Dr Hewitt advised ‘with confidence’ that ‘there is no professional society of paediatric endocrinologists internationally who would consider this anything other than a highly abnormal and frankly negligent approach’. She stated that ‘in Australia, the treatment provided by Gender GP would be unlawful’.

Dr Hewitt continued to be concerned about the very high level of testosterone registered during regular testing of Child J’s blood:
In October 2023, Dr Hewitt advised that the level of testosterone in the blood was ‘dangerously high’ and that, apart from the potential for adverse long-term consequences of such a level, J was ‘presently at risk of sudden death due to thromboembolic disease’, meaning the potential for the hormone to cause thickening of the blood.'

Insane.

She says her husband isn't involved but he is listed on their website.

Scary that some people might actually believe her?

She said in that interview that she was cleared all of wrongdoing and none of the allegations were upheld. Is this true or a lie?

She was very cagey when she said that.