Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Thread gallery
55
KittyWilkinson · 16/11/2025 23:20

A question for the autoclave owners.
Will they fit in the press or do you have to take the toaster out?

Emilesgran · 16/11/2025 23:23

ReadingTeaLeaves · 16/11/2025 23:13

I don’t think there’s any evidence of a link - it’s speculative based on the general area of waste recovery. I do not own an autoclave so am def not an expert but I think RHI was about wood pellets and Re3 were doing something else (“all waste”). So I think this angle is a stretch (but I have never looked at Ash for Cash / RHI in any depth.

edited for typos

Edited

Ok that makes sense, thanks. I'm multitasking here (well, watching TV and Twitter and now this. Not really tasks as such lol - anyway I wasn't following anything properly in the end.
Also apols for multiposting - my PC froze so I clicked several times, and now I don't know how to delete the extra posts.
(God I sound like a real eejit here.}

Can't wait for tomorrow though. Whoever thought Employment Tribunals could be so exciting? I was glued to Sandie Peggie's too, for the bit that we were allowed to watch, and then the Twitter coverage.

Namechanged999999 · 16/11/2025 23:23

KittyWilkinson · 16/11/2025 23:20

A question for the autoclave owners.
Will they fit in the press or do you have to take the toaster out?

You need to buy a large barn!

Namechanged999999 · 16/11/2025 23:24

Namechanged999999 · 16/11/2025 23:23

You need to buy a large barn!

Unless you already have one obviously :-)

SexRealistic · 16/11/2025 23:25

Emilesgran · 16/11/2025 23:05

This is amazing stuff! I haven't been following on here before today (mistake as I can't possibly catch up now!) and I can't listen to those videos at the moment, but I don't know if they would answer my question anyway, so can someone clarify for me if there's any actual evidence that Professor Professor was involved with the Cash for Ash scheme or are they just comparing the autoclave scheme to the RHI one? I can't quite work that out!
Thanks!

While I want to respect your contibution - stop spamming the thread. We are now 4 posts closer to a new thread. It more stressful to start a new thread than it is costly to ERECT a BIGLY SCREEN.

Its curious that on one hand people say we're an arts organistation and poorly funded and can't afford to do things properly - and then they are literally spaffing funds by spending £100,000 on a screen they cant even think how to use.

I'd love to see the grant funding applicaton for the BIGLY SCREEN that cannot be used because the events are so unpopular it isn't self funding.

OP posts:
KittyWilkinson · 16/11/2025 23:29

Namechanged999999 · 16/11/2025 23:24

Unless you already have one obviously :-)

More of a shed really, but I've paving up to it, so there's a traditional route to follow to get me wellies out.

Namechanged999999 · 16/11/2025 23:30

KittyWilkinson · 16/11/2025 23:29

More of a shed really, but I've paving up to it, so there's a traditional route to follow to get me wellies out.

Wasting an entire post to say 😃😂😂

Namechanged999999 · 16/11/2025 23:39

The ashes for cash has no legs maybe? In this context but has been taken over by the bigly scheme scam that is the new wee scam on the road. I will bow out. There are people here that know a lot more than me (I know nothing!) i will watch tomorrows proceedings avidly. Xx

Namechanged999999 · 16/11/2025 23:40

Namechanged999999 · 16/11/2025 23:39

The ashes for cash has no legs maybe? In this context but has been taken over by the bigly scheme scam that is the new wee scam on the road. I will bow out. There are people here that know a lot more than me (I know nothing!) i will watch tomorrows proceedings avidly. Xx

Bigly screen i mean.

RedNine · 16/11/2025 23:43

weegielass · 16/11/2025 17:08

here we go! I found her specialism! Self proclaimed of course. And she puts on an american accent :

In this video, she admits she didn't go to university but got given a visiting professorship and the irish accent is back :

OMG.

Super sleuthing, weegielass. Crikey.

KittyWilkinson · 16/11/2025 23:43

In all seriousness. I would dearly like to know who BFF bought the screen from.
Follow the money and all that.

ReadingTeaLeaves · 16/11/2025 23:45

It might have legs, or it might not. I don’t know. What definitely has legs is DB being listed in official documents of public appointments with two different academic titles which the evidence suggests are both erroneous.

SexRealistic · 16/11/2025 23:54

KittyWilkinson · 16/11/2025 23:43

In all seriousness. I would dearly like to know who BFF bought the screen from.
Follow the money and all that.

Probably a fire sale from another very expensive publically funded body who was funded by another public body to address the aims of a different public body.

But its the ERECTIONS that baffle me - what buy soemthing you can't even think of a real reason to use and you can't actually afford it when you may imagine an idea on how to use it.

I think it must be approx £10k per use at this rate.

OP posts:
BetaTwoAgony · 17/11/2025 00:05

ReadingTeaLeaves · 16/11/2025 23:45

It might have legs, or it might not. I don’t know. What definitely has legs is DB being listed in official documents of public appointments with two different academic titles which the evidence suggests are both erroneous.

Yes.

Parliamentary documents.

Going back eons.

Amazing

BetaTwoAgony · 17/11/2025 00:06

SexRealistic · 16/11/2025 23:54

Probably a fire sale from another very expensive publically funded body who was funded by another public body to address the aims of a different public body.

But its the ERECTIONS that baffle me - what buy soemthing you can't even think of a real reason to use and you can't actually afford it when you may imagine an idea on how to use it.

I think it must be approx £10k per use at this rate.

Trinny and Susannah would say that the price per wear didn't add up here.

NebulousSupportPostcard · 17/11/2025 00:14

Igneococcus · 16/11/2025 22:17

Autoclaves are basically pressure cookers. If you have one of those you have a very basic autoclave.

Excellent, so if I tip the kitchen bin contents into my crockpot express, can I expect to have pellets and a Visiting Professorship by morning?

Redshoeblueshoe · 17/11/2025 00:16

biggly screen

sorry not sorry

RedNine · 17/11/2025 00:19

I LOL'D UNKINDLY AT THE LEVEL 1 REIKI DISCLOSURE HUR HUR HUR

NoBinturongsHereMate · 17/11/2025 00:27

Cash for ash pellets were simple wood pellets.

Creating pellets from waste is far from simple. There was a government research laboratory working on for decades before giving it up as a bad job.

First you have to sort the waste - ideally to remove recyclables, but as a minimum to remove anything that will produce unacceptable levels of toxins, or that will explode during processing or burning (such as batteries).

After sorting you're left with a mix of materials and particle sizes that varies unpredictably from batch to batch. Extruding machines for pellet manufacture do not like variability - you need consistent moisture levels, hardness, size of pieces, fibrousness etc. Just getting pellets that will consistently hold together is difficult enough. Getting ones that will burn consistently, with a predictable heat output, without creating too much residue, soot or other pollution, and that can be produced at an economically viable cost is nigh on impossible.

BetaTwoAgony · 17/11/2025 00:34

RedNine · 17/11/2025 00:19

I LOL'D UNKINDLY AT THE LEVEL 1 REIKI DISCLOSURE HUR HUR HUR

So did I.

I also had a Ben Cooper thought when she said that she believed that everything you put out into the world reverberates back (vibes man) and wondered if it would be unkind to ask how that's going for her at the moment...

Namechanged999999 · 17/11/2025 00:35

NoBinturongsHereMate · 17/11/2025 00:27

Cash for ash pellets were simple wood pellets.

Creating pellets from waste is far from simple. There was a government research laboratory working on for decades before giving it up as a bad job.

First you have to sort the waste - ideally to remove recyclables, but as a minimum to remove anything that will produce unacceptable levels of toxins, or that will explode during processing or burning (such as batteries).

After sorting you're left with a mix of materials and particle sizes that varies unpredictably from batch to batch. Extruding machines for pellet manufacture do not like variability - you need consistent moisture levels, hardness, size of pieces, fibrousness etc. Just getting pellets that will consistently hold together is difficult enough. Getting ones that will burn consistently, with a predictable heat output, without creating too much residue, soot or other pollution, and that can be produced at an economically viable cost is nigh on impossible.

Which is why they probably never existed. Just money laundering.

moto748e · 17/11/2025 00:41

NoBinturongsHereMate · 17/11/2025 00:27

Cash for ash pellets were simple wood pellets.

Creating pellets from waste is far from simple. There was a government research laboratory working on for decades before giving it up as a bad job.

First you have to sort the waste - ideally to remove recyclables, but as a minimum to remove anything that will produce unacceptable levels of toxins, or that will explode during processing or burning (such as batteries).

After sorting you're left with a mix of materials and particle sizes that varies unpredictably from batch to batch. Extruding machines for pellet manufacture do not like variability - you need consistent moisture levels, hardness, size of pieces, fibrousness etc. Just getting pellets that will consistently hold together is difficult enough. Getting ones that will burn consistently, with a predictable heat output, without creating too much residue, soot or other pollution, and that can be produced at an economically viable cost is nigh on impossible.

I suppose there's some parallel here with the goings-on at Drax power station in England. I did some work there way back, must be fifteen years ago now, and even back then, the engineers there were all saying what a racket it was, how there was nothing green about it anyway (mind you, they'd have just carried on burning coal if they'd had their way).

BetaTwoAgony · 17/11/2025 00:51

She argues against incineration here:

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1A9h7Uxt6y/

Haven't read the link yet just the comments

Namechanged999999 · 17/11/2025 00:52

Namechanged999999 · 17/11/2025 00:35

Which is why they probably never existed. Just money laundering.

Obviously just surmising.

NebulousSupportPostcard · 17/11/2025 00:54

Sorry if I missed it but have we discussed this ET with a Mrs D Boyd as Claimant. I cant find more information it was just the subject matter and age profile that seemed it may fit.

Screenshot: Mrs D Boyd V Sec State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy 5/12/18

Sara Morrison v BFF Thread 3
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.