Hayden v Heath (LegalGengar) 21st November

[IDareSay]

The applications in Hayden v Heath will be heard at 10:30 on 21 November. Anyone wishing to support LegalGengar can observe using the Court Video Platform and the instructions are on the attached notice. Please ensure that your camera and mic are off. Tap on the notice to open.

https://x.com/CharlesTerf/status/1987897057038983309?s=20

Many women here will be aware of Hayden and his legal cases.

Good Lord he is a pointless little prannet.

The latest in the ongoing saga. Hayden has been served a Statutory Demand (for bankruptcy) and is not too pleased about it.

This from Charles Terf on Twitter/X:

Update on enforcement of costs in Hayden v Heath @ LegalGengar. I have now had a response to my letter to Hayden. The response started with the words “Please find attached (in PDF) correspondence of even date, which even you should be capable of understanding in terms absolute.”/1

The letter acknowledges the receipt of a statutory demand but denies it is valid because it was not personally served. Hayden states that unless it is withdrawn, Hayden will apply to set it aside. The Rules require the demand to be brought to Hayden’s attention. /2

Clearly a letter referring to the demand means it has been brought to Hayden’s attention. An application to set it aside would need to exhibit the demand. There is no requirement for personal service as claimed by Hayden. There are threats of an injunction etc which are odd /3

There is reference to a legal authority which has no relevance at all. Importantly Hayden openly admits the inability to pay, Hayden is therefore insolvent, as Hayden admitted in open court. Lots of bluster but no substance, that is par for the course. /4

The next step will be to present a bankruptcy petition to the court. A Trustee in Bankruptcy can then investigate the affairs of Hayden. Hayden’s application to set aside the demand or defend the petition will both fail. The effect of bankruptcy will be far reaching. /5

https://x.com/CharlesTerf/status/2036697919047262512?s=20

Oh dear things aren't going well for sh what with the application to have him deemed a vexatious litigant and now a belated bankruptcy order being requested aswell 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

His gallitrooning around and refusing to be at a confirmed address for service does not prevent service. He's already been made bankrupt once and all his whinging and ridiculous threats aren't going to stop it a second time.

Would the bankruptcy impact on his ability to harass his victim with these vexatious legal tactics ?

Doubt it it'll just fuck with his credit rating and ability to get a credit card, he or loan.
However the application to have him deemed a vexatious litigant will

Thanks @Hoardasurass I was confused as to the relevance because I thought he had no assets anyway and never paid his debts but targeted people who would risk losing their homes etc if they lost in court and had to pay costs.

Colin Wynter doesn’t seem too fussed about Hayden’s threat to report him to the BSB.

Someone told Colin that Hayden ‘won’t like what Colin is doing and will lash out’.

And Colin’s calm response has stayed with me. He said ‘throughout my career, people often don’t like what i’m saying, or doing. It doesn’t stop me, though’.

I’m still cringing at Hayden calling Simon Myerson ‘my learned friend’ during the hearing. 😫

I would love to have been a fly on the wall to see the look on SM’s face.

Hayden’s dormant company IA Legal allegedly has £25k cash at bank and in hand.

Sounds like more proof that SH is a vexatious litigant trying to use the law to carry out a personal vendetta against CW.
Let them speak

I know!

Plus acknowledging receipt of the demand for costs to Charles Terf in his letter claiming that it was invalid because it hadn’t been personally served.

There was a suggestion on Twitter that - IIRC - there would be a trustee to the bankruptcy who would have to approve legal action? IANAL so I don’t know how true that is, but it would clip SH’s legal wings if it is.

Thank you. If true that explains the relevance and the potential impact on his career in litigation.

“Career” is doing some heavy lifting there

my original post would have included the word vexatious but I opted to #bekind

😂😂

I didn't realize that vexatious litigation was a career path

Every field has its pioneers 🤷

Personally, I wouldn't be overly concerned about BSB complaints. My friend Adrian Yalland has received 16 (and there are more from different names). All were binned. In addition:

• A solicitor of mine was reported to the SRA (dismissed).
• My barrister was doxed on KiwiFarms.
• A solicitor friend was threatened with the SRA for helping me.
• Various solicitors representing my friends (Caroline, Matthew) have either been reported to, or threatened with, the SRA.

No complaint has ever gone anywhere. It's annoying being forced to respond to it in terms of time but there has never been any consequences except for perhaps the complainant who has made themselves look deranged.

Career.... off the road, through the hedge and down the field, into the river, with any luck!

Yes, it’s definitely not one that should have a stall at a careers fair.

Fat Tone could be used to encourage youngsters. Work hard at school, get a decent job and avoid ending up like this pathetic old man.

Why does Fat Tony have such a vendetta against Farrow in particular?

she’s strong, strident, unapologetic and a woman, so there’s four things for starters.