Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Your Corbyn/Sultana Party - Discussion thread - Part 2

1000 replies

fromorbit · 08/11/2025 09:57

The YP starting conference is in the ACC in Liverpool between 29-30 November so only three weeks off. With competing factions involving Islamic conservatives, every variety of Marxist/Communist, former Labour members, trade union activists, entryists from SWP and SPEW, splitters from the Scottish Greens, trans activists and actual left wing feminists [not the nice kind] it is difficult to underplay how much controversy there is likely to be. So we will need a second thread in advance.

Thus far following the internal drama of the UKs newest left party has taken a whole thread. It has been a wild ride and the party still does not have a name.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5394557-your-corbynsultana-party-discussion-thread

Your Corbyn/Sultana Party - Discussion thread | Mumsnet

The new left party is going to have significant implications for gender and sex discussions on the left in the UK and in wider political debate as wel...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5394557-your-corbynsultana-party-discussion-thread

OP posts:
Thread gallery
73
Carla786 · 06/01/2026 18:55

TempestTost · 06/01/2026 10:44

Empirically, constitutional monarchies have a good track record, I have never understood the sneering about them.

Politically, yes. But otoh the strong evidence for systematic CSA, sexual abuse and financial corruption cover ups for Mountbatten and Andrew, and the increasing proof of wealth hoarding (David Dimbleby etc) make me sceptical if the UK one is a good example of that.

Spain, Denmark,Netherlands otoh - they seem mostly OK.

Otoh how well have constitutional monarchies worked in the Middle East, rather than Europe?

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 18:59

SionnachRuadh · 06/01/2026 18:33

The celebrity thing is a real bugbear of mine. Yes, the entertainment industry has always leaned left, but not the way it does now. In the old Hollywood, a left wing atheist like Henry Fonda and a right wing Christian like Jimmy Stewart could be the best of friends, and most actors weren't overtly political at all.

I put the current situation down to two things. One is that in the 1990s, thanks to those two diamond geezers Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein, Hollywood became more or less an arm of the Democratic Party, and a very influential one. And then there was the advent of social media, so actors we used to only see in curated interviews when they had a product to sell, now they're on X or Bluesky all day long and sharing their opinions on everything and often just revealing themselves as idiots.

Do I need to know Mark Ruffalo's opinion on Venezuela? Do I even have confidence that Mark Ruffalo can spell Venezuela? Get back to acting in romcoms you silly man.

But it doesn't just affect the entertainment industries. You end up with the US Democrats running presidential campaigns that seem to think people will vote how celebrities tell them, and candidates like Hillary and Kamala that seem to treat the campaign as an excuse for partying with celebrities.

I'll say this for Joe Biden, when he was lucid, he didn't care about that stuff. If he was visiting a recycling plant in Pennsylvania, he didn't feel the need to bring Billie Eilish and the Jonas Brothers with him. That went against his whole persona as Blue Collar Joe, your union endorsed candidate.

If YP ever gets off the ground it will have a lot of the same thing, and if it doesn't then the celebs will migrate to the Greens. Corbyn in 2019 had more celebrity endorsements than any party leader ever. And that doesn't fill me with enthusiasm. Hardly a week goes by when we don't have an open letter signed by Olivia Colman or Charlotte Church or Steve Coogan, demanding the government do XYZ, and often the demands are daft, but everyone has to pretend to take them seriously.

Great post

On this bit - Yes, the entertainment industry has always leaned left, but not the way it does now. In the old Hollywood, a left wing atheist like Henry Fonda and a right wing Christian like Jimmy Stewart could be the best of friends, and most actors weren't overtly political at all.-

I'm not so convinced by that. The McCarthy witchhunts bitterly divided Hollywood, and that was in the 50s, and clearly quite a few actors were politically involved behind the scenes. They were less overtly political in public but that was partly due to studio control.

I'm not sure you could say Hollywood as a whole leaned left then. The book When Hollywood Was Right is interesting on this.

In the 60s, with studio control declining, a lot of celebrities spoke and/or marched for civil rights, but there was more consensus on that issue in Hollywood, so less division..

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:01

borntobequiet · 06/01/2026 10:44

I agree that Gove is a better journalist than politician. His shenanigans with Johnson over Brexit were ridiculous. Also, I think his listening skills are part of his politeness, and he only really hears opinions he agrees with. When he’s poorly informed and pigheaded about something - for example education - his political instincts are way off.

I like Gove's journalism but as a politician...less impressed.

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:03

TempestTost · 06/01/2026 11:01

I've heard that attitude to Obama from quite a few conservatives, particularly in the US. And not particularly racists or even white people.

I found it surprising because my feeling as an observer was that he had been a pretty solid political figure and person, whatever his partisan associations. But American conservatives seem to see his kind of politics as something much more unpleasant. Not about specific things he did so much, it seems to be about his political thinking.

Certainly in the last election cycle I was really unimpressed by him. He must have been complicit in the cover-ups around Biden's health, for some years, and he seemed to completely lack the political instincts he'd had previously. I think it was the video of him talking to a group of black men about why they should vote for Harris that I found most surprising, not from a partisan pov but because it was so clumsy and ineffective.

Maybe it's his perceived foreigness/cosmopolitanism that made them suspect he might not put American interests first? There was a lot of press anger about his Kenya & Indonesia connections. Also the arguments about him being a red-diaper baby.

I agree he seems to have lost his touch since...

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:07

SionnachRuadh · 06/01/2026 10:52

To circle back to the subject, I've long believed that, though the right often fail at retail politics, the left have the disadvantage of being much more ideological and working on the basis of (often incorrect) theories about the voters. I think that undermines their ability to listen and reinforces their tendency for what Lenin used to call "patiently explaining".

We just had a hilarious example of that with the African guy who phoned into Lewis Goodall when Goodall was holding forth about Venezuela and regime change, and the African guy was how lots of African countries went downhill after colonialism. It was hard to weigh up his argument, because Goodall talked all over him.

It also became obvious that Oxford-educated Lewis Goodall has large areas of history where he doesn't know very much, like when he said Japan hadn't been colonised and it had done pretty well as a society. The problem with that is that Japan had one of the most brutal colonial empires out there, and switching from massacring Chinese and Koreans to a pacifist society making wristwatches is mostly thanks to the American occupation after WW2. But Goodall seems to imagine that he ex officio knows more than anyone else, and is in a superior moral position to anyone else.

Left wing politics has Lewis Goodalls the way the comedy scene has an endless supply of Marcus Brigstockes. And they wonder why voters don't like them.

Re Japan, it's fair to say that the extreme brutality of WW2 was fuelled by the crazy sect who controlled the army after a couple and pushed the invasions through, teaching the whole nation a warped version of the Bushido code.

Yes, Japanese colonialism was certainly brutal before, but the apocalyptic situation of WW2 was not inevitable.

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:10

moto748e · 06/01/2026 11:07

I've never seen that Obama merited the over-enthusiasm he got from UK liberal opinion. He certainly wasn't 'pro-British' (and, tbc, there's no reason why a US Prez should be) like might have have been said about Reagan. Big drone fan, though.

If anyone watches the adult animated cartoon The Boondocks, the episode It's A Black President, Huey Freeman, is a very sharp satire of the crazy heights of Obama adulation in the US. UK was maybe just following their lead?

I agree Reagan was pro British but do you think he was a positive President overall? Not that I think Obama was , either...

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:12

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/01/2026 14:21

I agree! I think a lot of ex monarchies have a residual desire to recreate one. There is a lot to be said for having a head of state who is non political; and i also think there is something in human societies which seeks out, or certainly creates, royalty - in one form or other.

Hmm...I see what you mean. Otoh which ex monarchies do you see as wanting to recreate one? Germany? France? Italy? Poland? Maybe you could argue China or Russia, but I'm not sure if it's a lot.

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:14

TempestTost · 06/01/2026 17:48

In the US I think celebrities sometimes fall into that role.

I think what I like about consttutional monarchy is the sense that the state is fundamentally about human relations. People are not citizens in a nation as part of a contract, where we all agree to the arrangement and the rules that govern it.

It's much more like a family, which you didn't ask to be born into, and where you don't like everyone, but you have to be stuck in even with your annoying aunt and weird cousin and make the best of it.

Good point re celebrities. Arguably there was a kind of crossover of that with some Presidents like Kennedy & Reagan who ofc had strong connections to Hollywood.

The President is seen a bit differently in the US though. They are a public figure in a much more intense way than the PM is in the UK.

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:16

1984Now · 06/01/2026 10:52

We're going to see if all the caricatures of Farage are correct if as I suspect he makes history in 2029.
Thin skinned, can't work in a team, proto fascist, short tempered, Truss 2.0.
I follow Gawain Towler a lot, know Farage is working closely with James Orr, is formulating a big ground game, has a couple of big things to announce in 2026 (one of which will absolutely put the Tory Party in a massive bind).
While the Tories are in his slipstream, and Labour just cannot make Brits feel good in anyway, both looking to go on the attack that a vote for Reform will be a vote for the far right, Farage will instead make the political weather this year.
He's been politically astute enough to draw back from Musk and even Trump, knowing that US politics is not UK politics.
This suggests like Thatcher, Blair and at least to start Johnson, Farage has his finger on the pulse like no other politician in Britain.

Can I ask what will put the Tory party in a massive bind?

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/01/2026 19:20

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:12

Hmm...I see what you mean. Otoh which ex monarchies do you see as wanting to recreate one? Germany? France? Italy? Poland? Maybe you could argue China or Russia, but I'm not sure if it's a lot.

I think a lot of it is sublimimal, but I think France for one.....The French certainly love the British monarchy, as do the Italians...and the Queen ( Elizabeth 11) was referred to in France as 'The Queen'.

moto748e · 06/01/2026 19:21

I agree Reagan was pro British but do you think he was a positive President overall?

No, certainly not.

Chersfrozenface · 06/01/2026 19:22

Spain, Denmark, Netherlands otoh - they seem mostly OK.

Spain...well, there's Juan Carlos' money received from Saudi Arabia and salted away in Switzerland. And how much did his daughter Cristina know about her husband's financial shenanigans?

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/01/2026 19:24

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 18:55

Politically, yes. But otoh the strong evidence for systematic CSA, sexual abuse and financial corruption cover ups for Mountbatten and Andrew, and the increasing proof of wealth hoarding (David Dimbleby etc) make me sceptical if the UK one is a good example of that.

Spain, Denmark,Netherlands otoh - they seem mostly OK.

Otoh how well have constitutional monarchies worked in the Middle East, rather than Europe?

Jordan is probably one of the best examples of a more modern, and successful, constitutional monarchy in the Middle East.

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/01/2026 19:29

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:14

Good point re celebrities. Arguably there was a kind of crossover of that with some Presidents like Kennedy & Reagan who ofc had strong connections to Hollywood.

The President is seen a bit differently in the US though. They are a public figure in a much more intense way than the PM is in the UK.

American presidents ( and Russian) are treated like royalty and serve the same purpose and focus in the public imagination as a monarch. In Britain the Prime Minister is just an unmemorable officer of state by contrast - working behind a fairly standard black door on Downing Street.

Air Force One; the White House; the huge motor cavalacade that accompanies the President everywhere he goes. The position of First Lady is the equivalent of a Queen consort, having her own office and established roles and functions.

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:33

moto748e · 06/01/2026 19:21

I agree Reagan was pro British but do you think he was a positive President overall?

No, certainly not.

I agree ...otoh as a someone of Polish descent, I'm grateful for his role in the Iron Curtain coming down.

Honestly from what I've read about Reagan some of his biggest errors seem to have been made from ignorance, rather than malice etc. Eg. On AIDS, he was pretty OK with gay people for a man of his time, esp given his past in Hollywood which was probs a factor, but he allowed the Moral Majority to behave terribly. He should have listened to Billy Graham who refused to join it & warned evangelicals not to get too overtly political.

ArabellaSaurus · 06/01/2026 19:34

SionnachRuadh · 06/01/2026 18:33

The celebrity thing is a real bugbear of mine. Yes, the entertainment industry has always leaned left, but not the way it does now. In the old Hollywood, a left wing atheist like Henry Fonda and a right wing Christian like Jimmy Stewart could be the best of friends, and most actors weren't overtly political at all.

I put the current situation down to two things. One is that in the 1990s, thanks to those two diamond geezers Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein, Hollywood became more or less an arm of the Democratic Party, and a very influential one. And then there was the advent of social media, so actors we used to only see in curated interviews when they had a product to sell, now they're on X or Bluesky all day long and sharing their opinions on everything and often just revealing themselves as idiots.

Do I need to know Mark Ruffalo's opinion on Venezuela? Do I even have confidence that Mark Ruffalo can spell Venezuela? Get back to acting in romcoms you silly man.

But it doesn't just affect the entertainment industries. You end up with the US Democrats running presidential campaigns that seem to think people will vote how celebrities tell them, and candidates like Hillary and Kamala that seem to treat the campaign as an excuse for partying with celebrities.

I'll say this for Joe Biden, when he was lucid, he didn't care about that stuff. If he was visiting a recycling plant in Pennsylvania, he didn't feel the need to bring Billie Eilish and the Jonas Brothers with him. That went against his whole persona as Blue Collar Joe, your union endorsed candidate.

If YP ever gets off the ground it will have a lot of the same thing, and if it doesn't then the celebs will migrate to the Greens. Corbyn in 2019 had more celebrity endorsements than any party leader ever. And that doesn't fill me with enthusiasm. Hardly a week goes by when we don't have an open letter signed by Olivia Colman or Charlotte Church or Steve Coogan, demanding the government do XYZ, and often the demands are daft, but everyone has to pretend to take them seriously.

Agree with most of that, but don't forget Biden had that gormless tiktok prick round to the Whitehouse for a photo op. Budlight. Thinggummy.

Do I need to know Mark Ruffalo's opinion on Venezuela? Do I even have confidence that Mark Ruffalo can spell Venezuela?

😂

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:34

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/01/2026 19:24

Jordan is probably one of the best examples of a more modern, and successful, constitutional monarchy in the Middle East.

Good point, Jordan is a good example..

Jordan as whole has some way to go in modernising- women are still subject to guardianship laws , for one thing. But they have made a lot of progress.

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:36

Chersfrozenface · 06/01/2026 19:22

Spain, Denmark, Netherlands otoh - they seem mostly OK.

Spain...well, there's Juan Carlos' money received from Saudi Arabia and salted away in Switzerland. And how much did his daughter Cristina know about her husband's financial shenanigans?

Oh no, I didn't realise they had had financial corruption too.

I think also one of the Norweigan royals is being tried for rape?

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:38

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 18:59

Great post

On this bit - Yes, the entertainment industry has always leaned left, but not the way it does now. In the old Hollywood, a left wing atheist like Henry Fonda and a right wing Christian like Jimmy Stewart could be the best of friends, and most actors weren't overtly political at all.-

I'm not so convinced by that. The McCarthy witchhunts bitterly divided Hollywood, and that was in the 50s, and clearly quite a few actors were politically involved behind the scenes. They were less overtly political in public but that was partly due to studio control.

I'm not sure you could say Hollywood as a whole leaned left then. The book When Hollywood Was Right is interesting on this.

In the 60s, with studio control declining, a lot of celebrities spoke and/or marched for civil rights, but there was more consensus on that issue in Hollywood, so less division..

Edited

Re Fonda & Stewart, apparently they had a fist fight over beliefs and then resolved to not discuss them again. Either way, it's a gold example of friendship being prioritised.

1984Now · 06/01/2026 20:43

Carla786 · 06/01/2026 19:16

Can I ask what will put the Tory party in a massive bind?

Rumours that Farage will have all his parliamentary candidates for the GE vetted and chosen towards the end of the year, he'll make a time-limited offer to the incumbent Tories he wants on his side to come over, but by a particular date, likely the end of the year.
Suggests that Farage is still mindful of a snap GE in 2027, because of economic meltdown reasons or maybe a successor to Starmer calling a GE for legitimacy.
Whatever, Tory MPs will have a real decision.
Other Tory MPs not highlighted by Farage will know they have a real battle on their hands.
This added to a digital rollout of transparent policy making as every British citizen will be invited to suggest policies. I suspect Reform already have the policy making apparatus, but this will be a nationwide barometer for how popular some policies might be.

SionnachRuadh · 06/01/2026 20:57

1984Now · 06/01/2026 20:43

Rumours that Farage will have all his parliamentary candidates for the GE vetted and chosen towards the end of the year, he'll make a time-limited offer to the incumbent Tories he wants on his side to come over, but by a particular date, likely the end of the year.
Suggests that Farage is still mindful of a snap GE in 2027, because of economic meltdown reasons or maybe a successor to Starmer calling a GE for legitimacy.
Whatever, Tory MPs will have a real decision.
Other Tory MPs not highlighted by Farage will know they have a real battle on their hands.
This added to a digital rollout of transparent policy making as every British citizen will be invited to suggest policies. I suspect Reform already have the policy making apparatus, but this will be a nationwide barometer for how popular some policies might be.

Based on what I hear, so don't take it as gospel, a bunch of defections have already been agreed and all that's left is to time the announcements for best impact. Eg there are no Scottish or Welsh leaders - that might mean someone being announced at the campaign launch.

But the chatter is based on informed guesswork. The defections team is impressively not leaking. That's why Kruger was a surprise to everyone.

The big policy choice will be on pensions. That's important because based on the polling crosstabs, the only demographic keeping the Tories afloat is the over-75s. I'd rather dominate the 75+ bracket as the Tories do than the 18-24 bracket as the Greens do, because pensioners vote, but relying on the pensioner vote is not a long term option.

1984Now · 06/01/2026 20:59

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/01/2026 19:24

Jordan is probably one of the best examples of a more modern, and successful, constitutional monarchy in the Middle East.

Morocco?

1984Now · 06/01/2026 21:02

SionnachRuadh · 06/01/2026 20:57

Based on what I hear, so don't take it as gospel, a bunch of defections have already been agreed and all that's left is to time the announcements for best impact. Eg there are no Scottish or Welsh leaders - that might mean someone being announced at the campaign launch.

But the chatter is based on informed guesswork. The defections team is impressively not leaking. That's why Kruger was a surprise to everyone.

The big policy choice will be on pensions. That's important because based on the polling crosstabs, the only demographic keeping the Tories afloat is the over-75s. I'd rather dominate the 75+ bracket as the Tories do than the 18-24 bracket as the Greens do, because pensioners vote, but relying on the pensioner vote is not a long term option.

You mean ending the Triple Lock, or obligating all citizens to take out a private pension? Or both?

SionnachRuadh · 06/01/2026 21:23

1984Now · 06/01/2026 21:02

You mean ending the Triple Lock, or obligating all citizens to take out a private pension? Or both?

I don't know what they'll come up with. It's one of those problems right across the political spectrum, that everyone knows the Triple Lock isn't sustainable long term, but nobody wants to stick their neck out and do anything radical about it.

1984Now · 06/01/2026 21:33

SionnachRuadh · 06/01/2026 21:23

I don't know what they'll come up with. It's one of those problems right across the political spectrum, that everyone knows the Triple Lock isn't sustainable long term, but nobody wants to stick their neck out and do anything radical about it.

Older Boomers don't vote Reform anyway, so Farage should be bold on ending the Triple Lock. He needs to make policy to gain younger voters. I say this as someone approaching pension age just after the next GE...

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.