Good law project again

[Hoardasurass]

Well the fox killer is going after ECB for banning men from women's cricket because its not a contact sport as if its not dangerous for women to play against men🙄
Gift token below

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/0a441988592697f4

The fastest male bowlers deliver at about 100mph. The fastest women are 80mph. That addresses the fairness issue.

On the subject of whether cricket is contact or non-contact, why does Maugham think batsmen wear pads, gloves and helmets?

an ex colleague support him and occasionally posts links to his various doomed campaigns. She’s an educated woman, but her keenness to support the utterly deluded fox botherer has sadly convinced me that she’s deluded too. And not all that bright in reality.

Consequences of a trans child.

He's a bit like that female left wing lawyer who feels the need to constantly emphasise that she has a PhD all while shoving women under the bus.

Am sure it's possible to be a left wing lawyer who supports women as well as men...

I know it doesn't need to be said about cricket, but I went to watch the 100s with my daughter over the summer. Watching the women, who were wonderful but when they scored a six the ball typically made it just over the barrier but didn't bother us in the crowd. Stayed for the first half of the mens, the ball was frequently being hit into the crowd and on occasion almost onto the roof of Edgbaston. The power differential between the two was so clearly evident.

Well here’s hoping it will add to the growing group of legal precedents we have. Of course men shouldn’t be allowed in women’s cricket. And, on the bright side still, if the trans millions are heading towards our grifting ex-barrister (because cases on that topic bring him more loot than any other), they’re not going to the brilliant masterminds who somehow got us into this position in the first place.

I was just thinking that. I played a lot of sport at uni, of a non-contact but v physical variety. I did women only sessions and mixed sex sessions every week. I knew when I played with the guys they would have strength and height advantages. As we all did.

It's not even really making all sports mixed sex. At least not overtly mixed sex.

As with toilets, it seems to be really really important to have a category designated as "women only" but a certain subset of men get to have access to it.

I should point out that Maxine Blythin is still on the books of Wiltshire women's cricket team, having left Kent in 2021. In Blythin's first season at Kent, they were made Kent Woman Cricketer of the Year. To say that cricket is a non contact sport is ridiculous, as evidenced in the video of Brett Lee bowling at Piers Morgan. I played at the Lords indoor centre as part of our company's cricket practice and faced a young Aussie solicitor who was a very fast bowler, no comparison to the stuff I faced in club cricket. The men's cricket ball weighs between 5.5 oz and 5.75 oz, the women's ball weighs between 4.94 oz and 5.31 oz. The fastest ever ball recorded in women's cricket, was bowled by Shabnim Ismail at 82.1 mph. The fastest recorded ball by a male bowler was Shoaib Akhtar at 100.2 mph.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxine_Blythin

May not be 'overtly' mixed sex, but that is Jolyon's aim. To have no sports where only one sex can compete together.

If he wanted it on the basis of gender then perhaps he could suggest a way to differentiate the genders? I suspect he'd say this was gatekeeping or down to each individual's feelings or something.

If pool was a gender affected activity, I think the chances of cricket NOT being are zero.

Bunch of fecking eejits

I’ve watched a LOT of cricket. The women’s and men’s games are distinctly different in terms of hitting length, speed of bowling etc. the rope is brought in for the women’s game so the pitch is smaller, allowing there to be more boundaries from less powerful hitting. As someone said upthread, the men regularly hit the ball into the crowd or onto the roof but the women hardly ever do, never mind bowling speeds

Long funny Telegraph article on the GLP's attempt to end women's cricket . It looks doomed and in failing will help destroy the wider assault on women's sport

Meet the group trying to dismantle British sports’ transgender ban
Good Law Project is suing the ECB on behalf of an unnamed trans cricketer in what could be ‘test case’ for rest of British sport
Until a fortnight ago, the closest Jolyon Maugham got to sporting notoriety was clubbing a fox to death with a baseball bat. But that will all change if the crusading KC’s Good Law Project succeeds in overturning a ban imposed on those born male playing in women’s sport.
Almost two weeks ago the Maugham-led GLP announced it had begun legal action against the England and Wales Cricket Board over the latter’s transgender participation policy. The threatened lawsuit is the latest attention-grabbing case taken on by the GLP, which was founded by Maugham, an arch-Remainer, in January 2017 in the wake of the Brexit referendum.

https://archive.is/par1J#

What king of name is Jolyon anyway? Is anybody else called that?
Waits to be schooled lol

I don't think you can blame him for his name, but it might explain some of his actions.

He had a rather difficult family life.

Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns for sex-based rights charity Sex Matters:

“The GLP’s case is that the rules can be negotiated on a player-by-player or game-by-game basis. The Rugby Football Union tried a case-by-case approach, but found that it was impossible to assess which male players should be allowed to play in women’s teams and which should not. The GLP suggestion that the rules can be varied on request seems unfair both to the trans players asking for permission, and to the women under pressure to ‘be kind’ against their own interests.”

Does the GLP understand how sport works?

It's a name from 'The Forsyte Saga' to me, at least. It was a family name borne by several of the males.

The Forsytes had a family business and owned property in Mayfair and other such places. The trilogy follows the family through the ups and down of life.

Jolyon Maugham does not necessarily come from such a family ...

I consulted my actual paper Oxford Dictionary of names and as I suspected might be the case, it says under 'Jolyon' "see Julian".

The Forsyte Saga was broadcast in about 1967 IIRC, and Jolyon was born in 1971. I assume his mum was a big fan.

Just for fun, I looked to see if he's got a Grokipedia entry, and hey presto!

Jolyon Maugham

Mediaeval English version of Julianus, the more usual contemporary form in England is Julian but as @Rightsraptor says, it had a tiny revival as a result of the Forsyte Saga but Maugham's paternal grandfather's name was Henry Jules Benedictus so perhaps it's a nod to that form of Julius (Julianus is the diminutive form of Julius).