Tribunal Bingo

[SassyPearlEagle]

Long time lurker here. I've enjoyed reading for years - you're much more articulate and I don't have anything witty or informative to add, so don't post much. Just wanted to thank you all.

Question: is there a list/summary of all GC-related legal cases over the past few years? There are so many I'm struggling to remember which is which.

And I wonder if someone would like to make a humorous bingo card for us followers. What could the squares be?

• Bundles
• Pete the Plumber
• Suddenly settled out of court, right before due to start
• Defendant does not understand Equality Act
• Defendant struggling to explain sex/gender, making absolute tit of themselves
• Emotional support dogs/parents/fuck knows who else
• Judge getting pissed off
• Peanut-free dishes

Actually its quite possible I've missed a few recent cases. If anyone knows of any, be great if you could update that thread with links. Ta.

Edit: I've generally posted when there's been a result or judgement.

Application for anonymity by TIM witness when everyone knows who they are

A captured union.

Mysterious IT glitch loses evidence.

Seconding @ArabellaSaurus extremely comprehensive thread.

How about the fake concern over 'outing' a man that everyone knows is a man?

We consulted (with LGBT+ groups only) to create this policy that affected mainly women. And forgot to consult the women or tell them about the new policy.

Appearance of an unauthorised non-support animal (Judge Goodman's gorgeous cat, the on-screen dog mis-specied by SC)

Defence’s own witness/counsel misgenders/correctly sexes someone

Thanks for the links.

Bloody hell, there are so many. We're going to need a giant bingo card.

I must have missed some of these. Who reversed into a bin?

Michelle Brewer, now a judge.

Passive-aggressively responding to 'misgendering' of client by mispronouncing plaintiff's name as Muppet Show character.

And on a similar note, deliberate mispronunciation of Forstater.

Presence of the negligee-clad fox botherer.

Friends of the respondent sitting en masse, often directly behind the claimant's legal team.

WFTCHTJ

Sad times.
Contemporaneous notes.
Anyone disingenuously debating the definitions of words.

"Everyone else does it that way"
"I read some policies from other trusts"

If you’re in Australia, shopping from clothes in the women’s department of Kmart.

Laughing in Federal Court at the mention of Smelly Balls Candles costs $10,000 in damages.

Microphone sound quality akin to someone whispering into a bucket on the other side of the room.

Grumpy clerks.

Non-existent equality impact assessments