But that is just twisting the reality. There may well be men who are on the receiving end of a hate crime because of their sex, but real life, and everyone knows it is far more likely that women will experience a hate crime because of their female sex.
The arguement is as dumb as saying we should have race as a hate crime because white people will try and use it to say they are the victims of racial hate. But again in reality we all know that it is for more likely that members of Black and other Minority Ethnic communities are far more likely to be victims of racial hate.
It always amazes me that women aren't thought to have the same right to protection as those who are victims of racism.
The core of the article is that engender like other TRAs hates anything that says women are biological females, and not those who identify as a gender. So they are prioritising trans rights to claim equivilance with actual sex, than prioritising women's right to be protected.
As usual women's rights are dumped on so as to try and advance (despite the Supreme Court ruling) that TWAW.
Isn't there a clause in the Hate Crime legislation that gives trans people the right to claim they are the victim of transphobic hate?
But then of course that would mean accepting they are trans.