No - race is a social construct. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Race#:~:text=Race%20is%20a%20political%20and,at%20perceiving%20and%20interpreting%20reality.%E2%80%9D The NHGRI explains it well:
Race is a political and social construct that is fluid. Racial categorization can change over time, place, and context. Race has been used historically to establish a social hierarchy, whereby individuals are treated differently resulting in racism. Genomic scientists are currently investigating the relationship between self-identified race and genetic ancestry. There is more genetic variation within self-identified racial groups than between them. I like Professor Audrey Smedley's definition. She states, “Race is a culturally structured systematic definition of a way of looking at perceiving and interpreting reality.”
Gender is the same and we know this because it too change over time, but unlike race, there is a lot more scope for change. You will never get rid of all gender stereotypes but some can have their power to oppress diminished.
The overt expression of gender is, in the main, clothes, hair, make-up and name and this is what I was talking about specifically. None of those things relate to biological reality which is why we argue that just because a girl is a 'tom-boy' or a boy likes wearing 'girls' clothes, it does not make them trans. TRAs, in contrast, actively lean into those stereotypes.
Re: Khelife (I will put aside Semenya for now because I have conceded I would be willing to re-consider my position on them).
You are assuming that all people 5-ARD condition have ambiguous genitalia, but it is my understanding from reading up on it that that is not always the case - sometimes they will have female genitalia - and we do not know which it is for either of them.
I have been very clear about my view that they should not be involved in female sport, but if Khelife was born and raised female (which the pictures I've seen of her as a child seem to indicate), particularly in a society like Algeria, her formative years will have been very much littered with the same female expectation and oppression of any other girl.
We know how important those early childhood years are psychologically in formation of personality, healthy attachment etc. To turn around and say to someone who has spent the first 10-15 of their lives as a girl, that they now, immediately, have to be a boy is cruel.
Many people with 5-ARD go on to live as men, but, in my view, it should be entirely their choice, and one that is made after extensive counselling following diagnosis.
You recognise that there is a whole industry around getting people with 5-ARD into sports to make money but then you go on to blame the child and say they are complicit in the con say that by 15 they know they are not female and are complicit in the con.
Many of these teenagers have been raised in a society that values girls less than boys, and in some cases raised to be subservient to men. They are just starting to realise they are different to other girls, they are being given a lifeline out of poverty for them and their families by unscrupulous adults and quite possibly not being given the full facts of their medical condition and you call them complicit?
You are expecting a teenager to have a full understanding of a complex medical condition and what it means, stand up to their parents / trainers / community and give up on a dream which has been sold to them?
It has a lot of parrallels to grooming.
People diagnosed with 5-ARD often go on to live as men, but it should be their decision following extensive counselling. It should not be made by other people as part of a witch hunt.