Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Dr Joseph Chrysostom - Open letter to the young people of Britain

74 replies

BlueLegume · 08/10/2025 08:50

Apologies if there is already a thread on this - just read this reposted by Seen in Journalism.

I have written an open letter to the young people of Britain who may be considering undergoing the unscientific and mutilating procedure known as “gender-affirming surgery.”
My purpose is to urge them to pause and carefully reconsider their decision.
Open Letter to British Youth Considering Gender Surgery
Dear Young People,
I am Dr. Joseph Chrysostom, a medical doctor who has served in the NHS for over 25 years. I am writing to you out of deep concern and genuine care — to warn you about what I believe to be some of the most harmful and deceptive medical practices currently happening in our country. These include the use of cross-sex hormones and surgeries such as vaginoplasty, orchidectomy, and phalloplasty, offered both within and outside the NHS. What I write here reflects my professional opinion and sincerely held belief based on my knowledge of human biology and surgical practice.
You have been told that you can “change sex.” But biologically, that is impossible. Every one of your body’s trillions of cells carries either XX or XY chromosomes — a genetic signature that cannot be altered by hormones or surgery. To claim otherwise is, in my view, deeply misleading. Any doctor or institution promising to “feminise” or “masculinise” the human body without changing its DNA is, in effect, deceiving you.
I believe this deception began early — in schools, through Relationship and Sex Education materials that claimed gender is fluid and that sex is “assigned at birth.” That is false. Sex is determined at conception, and by the seventh week of foetal development, it is already biologically clear whether a person is male or female. By teaching that doctors might have “assigned” you the wrong sex, these materials planted a dangerous idea — one that could easily take hold during adolescence, a time when self-doubt and confusion are common.
In my view, this was not education but indoctrination. Schools were instructed to hide these matters from parents — the very people best placed to support you through emotional confusion. This isolation mirrors the pattern seen in cult-like ideologies: separating young people from those who love them most. Once detached from parental guidance, vulnerable youth become easy targets for ideologues and, later, for those in medicine who profit from these falsehoods.
Sadly, some doctors, surgeons, endocrinologists and psychologists — knowingly or not — have become part of this system. Cross-sex hormones are being prescribed despite well-documented long-term complications. Surgeons have begun to perform irreversible operations on healthy bodies. When challenged, the professional institutions — Royal Colleges, GMC, NHS England, and the Department of Health — all pass responsibility between themselves. No one will say these surgeries are not deceptive. Yet none will take accountability either.
Let me be clear about what these procedures truly involve:
Vaginoplasty does not create a vagina. It creates a deep surgical slit-like narrow space lined with skin. It is a wound tending to heal and contract, not an organ. It lacks the glands, microbiome, glycogen-rich inner lining, acidic pH (to protect against infections) and natural functions of a female reproductive tract.
Phalloplasty does not create a penis. It forms a mound of skin and fat from another part of the body. It cannot perform erection, emission, or ejaculation — the defining functions of male sexual anatomy.
Mastectomy cannot make a female chest into a male one. It leaves irreversible scars and removes healthy breasts permanently leaving you incapable of lactation.
These are not restorative surgeries — they are destructive ones. In my opinion, they have the potential to turn healthy young people into lifelong patients, dependent on the medical system for repairs, revisions, and mental health support.
What you truly need is not surgery, but psychotherapy — compassionate, skilled counselling to help you understand and accept your biological reality. You deserve truth, not ideology. You deserve to be treated with honesty, not with the promise of impossible transformations.
I believe that within a few years, many of those who underwent these surgeries will express deep regret — but by then, it will be too late. Lost organs cannot be replaced. The physical and psychological scars are permanent.
I urge you: step away from the conveyor belt that starts in classrooms and ends in operating theatres. Parents and professionals across the world are now awakening to the dangers of gender ideology. Within the next few years this conveyor belt will be empty due to the alertness of current generation of parents. Accountability is coming. I believe, those who performed, assisted, promoted, or profited from these procedures will one day have to answer for them.
Thank you for reading this letter with an open mind. I write not to condemn you, but to protect you — before irreversible harm is done.
With sincerity and concern,
Dr. Joseph Chrysostom, MBBS, MS (Gen Surg), FRCSEd
GMC 5199143

OP posts:
Shineonyoucrazy · 10/10/2025 07:11

I wish he’d expanded on the joy of realising you can be free of the shackles of expected gender expression if they aren’t for you and I thank the second wave feminist and trans rights movement for making this increasingly socially acceptable. I spent my adolescence miserable because I hated feminine clothes - I felt I didn’t fit in, jibes from family, feeling I dressed wrong for interviews and feeling false and stilted, thinking as a young child I couldn’t get married because the idea of wearing a white dress made me feel sick. If I’d been born three decades later I would be at risk of the gender reassignment fallacy instead of a proud gender non conforming woman and mother.

nauticant · 10/10/2025 07:52

moto748e · 08/10/2025 23:47

30 letters and no-one wants to know. Wow. Spineless fuckers.

I assume part of the campaign is to have an eye on the future when gender ideology falls away discredited and those who could have intervened will try to claim ignorance: "But how was I to know that these were harmful procedures and opposition was growing?"

Haemagoblin · 10/10/2025 09:59

Igneococcus · 10/10/2025 06:47

Seriously? That is what you criticize him for, that he expresses himself clearly and precisely? If a kid that wants to go through life changing medical interventions can't be arsed to read this letter properly they are definitely not mature enough to make a decision about life changing medical intervention.

Yeah sorry I do. In a debate like this where everyone has an opinion he has the option of making a valuable contribution as a medical professional. Getting someone to proofread it for him to make sure he didn't sound like a prat would have been a good idea.

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 10/10/2025 10:29

Haemagoblin · 10/10/2025 06:38

Unfortunately this guy writes like Alan Partridge. The style is so risible that the content wouldn't get a look in, especially with the kids who have zero time for this sort of pomposity. It's almost a parody. Esp the letter to the Arch Bish where he holds up his Welsh mum's grammar errors and use of emoji with verbal tongs, and oh lord save us - "the true Penis of a Man" 🤣

He'd have been better off sticking to the science and leaving off the style imho.

Edited

He is from India.

BlueLegume · 10/10/2025 10:43

The journalist Nick Wallis of Post Office scandal fame is now looking into the gender situation. He has posted on his blog about the Dr and his letters.

As someone said earlier at the very least when we get to the point in history where this whole thing becomes ‘the scandal of a generation’ and it will he will have the paper trail to stand up and say as a clinician he highlighted the issues.

As ever with this issue there is simply no debate from the TRAs. You either fully accept their ideaology or you are transphobic. I hope anyone supporting the TransBashBack group who have vandalised the conference centre in Brighton currently hosting the feminist conference have a real look at themselves. Women should be allowed a space to discuss women’s issues without being attacked.

OP posts:
RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 10/10/2025 12:23

OldCrone · 10/10/2025 10:33

I think the main problem with him getting his message out there is that no one will see it. Has it been published anywhere except on X (and on here)?

This is all I found when I searched for it.

joseph chrysostom on X:

He has written to every relevant institution and political body he can think of - it's all someone else's problem. Just like SingleSexSpacesinSchools writing to everyone with a safeguarding responsibility about his children's school changing room situation. I think his letters are slowly getting wider exposure, but he is a working surgeon in an A&E department not a publicist (and not a professional writer!). He is speaking up from his surgical perspective because he is horrified by the procedures themselves, which go against his ethical principles, which derive from the ethical principles that all surgeons should abide by. All this is in the knowledge that he may get pushback or worse from activists.

Haemagoblin · 10/10/2025 12:42

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 10/10/2025 10:29

He is from India.

Proof readers are a thing.

BlueLegume · 10/10/2025 12:45

@Haemagoblin if you do not agree with the letter and its style you could a) contact him or b) scroll on by and unwatchable this thread

OP posts:
HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 10/10/2025 12:47

Dragonasaurus · 08/10/2025 09:51

Thankyou to Doctor Chrysostom. This should be taught in PHSE in all senior schools and should be required reading for all trainee psychologists and social workers

Most definitely. The antithesis of the horror that is the genderbread that’s been shown in schools across the UK.

BlueLegume · 10/10/2025 12:56

⬆️ unwatch thread not unwatchable 🙄

OP posts:
RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 10/10/2025 13:09

Haemagoblin · 10/10/2025 12:42

Proof readers are a thing.

In my opinion it isn't great to criticise someone for their English style when it may be their second language, or they may have grown up in a different country (as is definitely the case with Joseph Chrysostom). How aware he is that his style is unusual in this country, I have no idea. He is a surgeon who has dedicated his life to helping trauma victims, and his expertise doesn't depend on his facility with standard English. Maybe he should have kept quiet, and left it for someone else to speak out? But no-one else with surgical expertise has done so, as far as I know. He at least is not a coward and has risked his career.

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 10/10/2025 13:11

Haemagoblin · 10/10/2025 12:42

Proof readers are a thing.

Low blow. Poor form.

quixote9 · 10/10/2025 13:41

Haemagoblin · 10/10/2025 12:42

Proof readers are a thing.

For God's sake, Goblin. Tell you what: why don't you rewrite what he said in your approved style and post it. Then we can all have the benefit of your stylistic abilities.

BlueLegume · 10/10/2025 13:57

@Haemagoblin style and language are irrelevant IMHO. The Dr has put in writing the absolute reality of this dangerous ideology. I have no doubt gender disphoria must be dreadful to live with but more care is needed to ensure the immediate go to treatment is gender reassignment. This scandal is living in plain sight all because any counter arguments by TRAs point directly to transphobia. No debate no listening no science based evidence from them. We are not helping people with mental illness by telling them all will be fine chopping off body parts and medicalising themselves for life.

OP posts:
BlueLegume · 10/10/2025 14:07

⬆️is NOT reassignment 🙄

OP posts:
PatrickBaitman · 10/10/2025 14:31

On the trans subreddits they talk about these neo vaginas almost like it’s identical to a real vagina.

That’s part of actually changing the biological sex.

They talk about it like you might not even know if you have had sex with a trans woman unless you have asked all women you have slept with if they are trans or not.

But I doubt this, they are notorious liers, and they even need to believe this lie themselves.

What is the hard truth? Could one construct a vagina so realistic that it both looks and functions(for sex) as a real vagina?

quixote9 · 10/10/2025 15:04

PatrickBaitman · 10/10/2025 14:31

On the trans subreddits they talk about these neo vaginas almost like it’s identical to a real vagina.

That’s part of actually changing the biological sex.

They talk about it like you might not even know if you have had sex with a trans woman unless you have asked all women you have slept with if they are trans or not.

But I doubt this, they are notorious liers, and they even need to believe this lie themselves.

What is the hard truth? Could one construct a vagina so realistic that it both looks and functions(for sex) as a real vagina?

No.

(Uni biology prof.)

PatrickBaitman · 10/10/2025 16:33

quixote9 · 10/10/2025 15:04

No.

(Uni biology prof.)

So just another part of the lies and delusion in other words.

I have a friend who is a detransitioner. She’s told me she got a ton of health problems down south, with the neo penis thing. Have to use a tube just to pee. She is one of these autistic females who didn’t find her perfect place in society and got herself hijacked by the crazy trans ideology and now regrets it.

quixote9 · 11/10/2025 00:10

@PatrickBaitman It's easy to understand female anatomy if you're male (and vice versa) if you think about the homologies. The outer labia are homologous to scrotal skin, which means the sensitivity is similar. The inner labia are homologous to the skin on the shaft of the penis. The clitoris is homologous to the penile glans. The clitoris has somewhat more nerve endings than the head of the penis in a much smaller area, so understanding-by-homology breaks down a bit. The density of the nerve endings means it's like the difference between sensations on the tongue versus the inner forearm. The clitoris connects to two strands of tissue that surround the vagina and are homologous to erectile tissue in the penis.

Now, if a penis "replacement" is made of skin (regular old run-of-the-mill thigh skin with one hundredth the nerve endings) filled with some fat tissue, we're all probably pretty clear that it's not quite the same.

Likewise, cutting an opening through perineal tissue and inserting a (regular) skin pouch has none, none, of the complexity and sensitivity of the real thing.

So, yes, just the usual lies / wishful thinking.

Iamnotalemming · 11/10/2025 03:18

His descriptions of the surgeries are upsetting to read but I think that is a good thing. It’s staggering that none of them are willing to respond properly, a real scandal. I'm grateful for his efforts and I hope he continues to persevere.

GallantKumquat · 11/10/2025 03:37

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 10/10/2025 10:29

He is from India.

I'm afraid I have to agree with Haemagoblin, the text itself has obviously been run though AI, and has all the hallmarks of AI prose. It's very conspicuous and some people are especially sensitive. That's not to say the underlying thoughts aren't original, and presumably Chrysostom has reviewed it and the views are authentically his own. It shows one of the dangers of using AI as a proofreader.

OldCrone · 11/10/2025 05:45

Haemagoblin · 10/10/2025 06:38

Unfortunately this guy writes like Alan Partridge. The style is so risible that the content wouldn't get a look in, especially with the kids who have zero time for this sort of pomposity. It's almost a parody. Esp the letter to the Arch Bish where he holds up his Welsh mum's grammar errors and use of emoji with verbal tongs, and oh lord save us - "the true Penis of a Man" 🤣

He'd have been better off sticking to the science and leaving off the style imho.

Edited

Your reading comprehension seems to be very poor.

The "Welsh mum" isn't his mother, but the mother of a trans identifying child. And what on earth are "verbal tongs"?

If you have a point to make about his writing style, it might be sensible to (a) indicate that you've actually read and understood what he's written and (b) write your own posts in language that doesn't appear to have been generated by AI.

OldCrone · 11/10/2025 06:00

GallantKumquat · 11/10/2025 03:37

I'm afraid I have to agree with Haemagoblin, the text itself has obviously been run though AI, and has all the hallmarks of AI prose. It's very conspicuous and some people are especially sensitive. That's not to say the underlying thoughts aren't original, and presumably Chrysostom has reviewed it and the views are authentically his own. It shows one of the dangers of using AI as a proofreader.

Edited

Can you expand on why you think this well-educated man would have relied on AI to write these important letters, like a lazy teenager who can't be bothered to write their own essay?

He's a surgeon, not a professional writer. My own experience is that some surgeons seem to write in rather odd and archaic language. I've put this down to the fact that for many of them English isn't their first language, and writing isn't their main skill.

It's not clear to me why you and @Haemagoblin are so obsessed by the language rather than the content (although I could make a guess).

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 11/10/2025 06:06

Iamnotalemming · 11/10/2025 03:18

His descriptions of the surgeries are upsetting to read but I think that is a good thing. It’s staggering that none of them are willing to respond properly, a real scandal. I'm grateful for his efforts and I hope he continues to persevere.

I'd like to ban the use of coy euphemisms like top surgery and bottom surgery. Dr Chrysostom describes in eye-watering detail what is actually involved. Nothing cute sounding there. These facts should be more widely known, along with the side effects of puberty blockers and cross-hormones.