Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Dr Joseph Chrysostom - Open letter to the young people of Britain

74 replies

BlueLegume · 08/10/2025 08:50

Apologies if there is already a thread on this - just read this reposted by Seen in Journalism.

I have written an open letter to the young people of Britain who may be considering undergoing the unscientific and mutilating procedure known as “gender-affirming surgery.”
My purpose is to urge them to pause and carefully reconsider their decision.
Open Letter to British Youth Considering Gender Surgery
Dear Young People,
I am Dr. Joseph Chrysostom, a medical doctor who has served in the NHS for over 25 years. I am writing to you out of deep concern and genuine care — to warn you about what I believe to be some of the most harmful and deceptive medical practices currently happening in our country. These include the use of cross-sex hormones and surgeries such as vaginoplasty, orchidectomy, and phalloplasty, offered both within and outside the NHS. What I write here reflects my professional opinion and sincerely held belief based on my knowledge of human biology and surgical practice.
You have been told that you can “change sex.” But biologically, that is impossible. Every one of your body’s trillions of cells carries either XX or XY chromosomes — a genetic signature that cannot be altered by hormones or surgery. To claim otherwise is, in my view, deeply misleading. Any doctor or institution promising to “feminise” or “masculinise” the human body without changing its DNA is, in effect, deceiving you.
I believe this deception began early — in schools, through Relationship and Sex Education materials that claimed gender is fluid and that sex is “assigned at birth.” That is false. Sex is determined at conception, and by the seventh week of foetal development, it is already biologically clear whether a person is male or female. By teaching that doctors might have “assigned” you the wrong sex, these materials planted a dangerous idea — one that could easily take hold during adolescence, a time when self-doubt and confusion are common.
In my view, this was not education but indoctrination. Schools were instructed to hide these matters from parents — the very people best placed to support you through emotional confusion. This isolation mirrors the pattern seen in cult-like ideologies: separating young people from those who love them most. Once detached from parental guidance, vulnerable youth become easy targets for ideologues and, later, for those in medicine who profit from these falsehoods.
Sadly, some doctors, surgeons, endocrinologists and psychologists — knowingly or not — have become part of this system. Cross-sex hormones are being prescribed despite well-documented long-term complications. Surgeons have begun to perform irreversible operations on healthy bodies. When challenged, the professional institutions — Royal Colleges, GMC, NHS England, and the Department of Health — all pass responsibility between themselves. No one will say these surgeries are not deceptive. Yet none will take accountability either.
Let me be clear about what these procedures truly involve:
Vaginoplasty does not create a vagina. It creates a deep surgical slit-like narrow space lined with skin. It is a wound tending to heal and contract, not an organ. It lacks the glands, microbiome, glycogen-rich inner lining, acidic pH (to protect against infections) and natural functions of a female reproductive tract.
Phalloplasty does not create a penis. It forms a mound of skin and fat from another part of the body. It cannot perform erection, emission, or ejaculation — the defining functions of male sexual anatomy.
Mastectomy cannot make a female chest into a male one. It leaves irreversible scars and removes healthy breasts permanently leaving you incapable of lactation.
These are not restorative surgeries — they are destructive ones. In my opinion, they have the potential to turn healthy young people into lifelong patients, dependent on the medical system for repairs, revisions, and mental health support.
What you truly need is not surgery, but psychotherapy — compassionate, skilled counselling to help you understand and accept your biological reality. You deserve truth, not ideology. You deserve to be treated with honesty, not with the promise of impossible transformations.
I believe that within a few years, many of those who underwent these surgeries will express deep regret — but by then, it will be too late. Lost organs cannot be replaced. The physical and psychological scars are permanent.
I urge you: step away from the conveyor belt that starts in classrooms and ends in operating theatres. Parents and professionals across the world are now awakening to the dangers of gender ideology. Within the next few years this conveyor belt will be empty due to the alertness of current generation of parents. Accountability is coming. I believe, those who performed, assisted, promoted, or profited from these procedures will one day have to answer for them.
Thank you for reading this letter with an open mind. I write not to condemn you, but to protect you — before irreversible harm is done.
With sincerity and concern,
Dr. Joseph Chrysostom, MBBS, MS (Gen Surg), FRCSEd
GMC 5199143

OP posts:
GallantKumquat · 11/10/2025 06:20

OldCrone · 11/10/2025 06:00

Can you expand on why you think this well-educated man would have relied on AI to write these important letters, like a lazy teenager who can't be bothered to write their own essay?

He's a surgeon, not a professional writer. My own experience is that some surgeons seem to write in rather odd and archaic language. I've put this down to the fact that for many of them English isn't their first language, and writing isn't their main skill.

It's not clear to me why you and @Haemagoblin are so obsessed by the language rather than the content (although I could make a guess).

Well, firstly I should be clear that I don't object to his content, language, or the letter generally; I think it's clear, factual and non polemic. To answer your question

  • Can you expand on why you think this well-educated man would have relied on AI to write these important letters

Lot's of professionals (especially) now use AI to speed up composition. It's much faster, and eliminates typos - my bane, so I'm often tempted to use it myself. But, as I said it's very conspicuous and some people find it highly annoying. Not me! But it is a risk.

Igneococcus · 11/10/2025 06:29

I'd really like to see someone rewrite this letter in a style that they find acceptable but still contains all the important points set out clearly and coherently and doesn't assume every young person is a TikTok addled moron who can't cope wit sentences of more than five words.
I can honestly not see the problem or understand the accusations of AI use.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 11/10/2025 06:31

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 11/10/2025 06:06

I'd like to ban the use of coy euphemisms like top surgery and bottom surgery. Dr Chrysostom describes in eye-watering detail what is actually involved. Nothing cute sounding there. These facts should be more widely known, along with the side effects of puberty blockers and cross-hormones.

I agreed with the ban on euphemisms, it gender affirming care for children that gets my goat, it should be started that it in fact paediatric sex trait mutilation or some such. I'm glad the doctor didn't pull any punches with his words, they reckon words can hurt, well words can clarify as well, and the more clarity brought to this ideology the better. It's time to take control of the narrative and replace the euphemisms with words that tell it like it is.

Soontobe60 · 11/10/2025 06:40

Haemagoblin · 10/10/2025 06:38

Unfortunately this guy writes like Alan Partridge. The style is so risible that the content wouldn't get a look in, especially with the kids who have zero time for this sort of pomposity. It's almost a parody. Esp the letter to the Arch Bish where he holds up his Welsh mum's grammar errors and use of emoji with verbal tongs, and oh lord save us - "the true Penis of a Man" 🤣

He'd have been better off sticking to the science and leaving off the style imho.

Edited

He’s a surgeon, not a linguist or JKR!

OldCrone · 11/10/2025 06:50

GallantKumquat · 11/10/2025 06:20

Well, firstly I should be clear that I don't object to his content, language, or the letter generally; I think it's clear, factual and non polemic. To answer your question

  • Can you expand on why you think this well-educated man would have relied on AI to write these important letters

Lot's of professionals (especially) now use AI to speed up composition. It's much faster, and eliminates typos - my bane, so I'm often tempted to use it myself. But, as I said it's very conspicuous and some people find it highly annoying. Not me! But it is a risk.

Can you give a couple of examples from one of his letters that makes you think he's used AI? I'm intrigued about how you spot this.

GallantKumquat · 11/10/2025 10:18

OldCrone · 11/10/2025 06:50

Can you give a couple of examples from one of his letters that makes you think he's used AI? I'm intrigued about how you spot this.

Well it's not 100% easy to explain. But here are some points:

  • The text is flowery, formal and formulaic without any particular character. It specifically breaks up long sentences of loose clauses with short sentences which provide artificial variation without reinforcing the argument.
  • It lacks personality, anecdote or concrete references to the person of the author, even inadvertent - giving the sense that the author is instead anonymous, except for the bald facts.
  • It uses em dashes which most people find difficult to type.
  • It uses opening and closing quotations which many people find difficult to type.
  • It has the cadence of Reddit prose, a kind of you know it when you see it style, e.g. it lacks specific technical jargon, shorthand, and idiomatic usage.
  • 'Deception' and 'conveyor belt' are awkward. Probably they were present in the bullet pointed skeleton provided to the AI, but in the final text they (to me) don't seem natural.

None of the this proves that AI was involved in the composition. After all AI is trained using actual human prose - a human is capable of writing this way. But having seen a large number of texts on social media where AI has been deployed to help (or perhaps entirely) compose, I would assert that the style is unmistakable in this case. I immediately agreed with Haemagoblin on it being awkward pinpointed it to AI when I read the comment, and like I've mentioned before, I'm favorably disposed to the author and don't find the use of AI automatically invalidating, but I do recognize that it can have an inadvertent negative effect, especially in the context of prose that's meant to be persuasive.

Adding - if someone were to give an informal talk on a subject, say with a power point presentation to a small group of colleagues, and then ask chatGPT to produce a letter for a specific purpose, this is what I would expect.

BlueLegume · 11/10/2025 12:34

AI /ChatGPT either way the horrors of transing children with possible poor mental health is abhorrent and it needed putting down in black and white.

OP posts:
RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 11/10/2025 13:37

GallantKumquat · 11/10/2025 03:37

I'm afraid I have to agree with Haemagoblin, the text itself has obviously been run though AI, and has all the hallmarks of AI prose. It's very conspicuous and some people are especially sensitive. That's not to say the underlying thoughts aren't original, and presumably Chrysostom has reviewed it and the views are authentically his own. It shows one of the dangers of using AI as a proofreader.

Edited

To me it reads like the writing of someone brought up India who has lived and worked for over 25 years in Wales, so his Indian expression of English has been modified, just as my language is not identical to they way I spoke as a young man in a different part of the UK. What hallmarks of AI prose do you see that are not explicable by his upbringing and professional / personal background? I note that his layout doesn't look like the product of AI.

BlueLegume · 11/10/2025 13:40

Anyone questioning the style/prose/language …..I am about the contents and safeguarding of children. He could have written it in Greek - it does not take away from the context that children are being directed to a lifetime of medical intervention as opposed to letting them grow up and experience distress and learn how to work through things.

OP posts:
OldCrone · 11/10/2025 13:51

BlueLegume · 11/10/2025 13:40

Anyone questioning the style/prose/language …..I am about the contents and safeguarding of children. He could have written it in Greek - it does not take away from the context that children are being directed to a lifetime of medical intervention as opposed to letting them grow up and experience distress and learn how to work through things.

Yes. All this focus on whether he may or may not have used AI to write this seems to be designed to avoid focusing on the content.

I found this, which is a transcript of the evidence he presented to parliament.

https://can-sg.org/2025/07/04/gender-affirming-surgery-a-systematic-medical-deception/

Does it really matter if he ran this transcript through an AI program with the instruction to rewrite it as a letter to young people?

It's the content which is important, not any technological assistance he might have used to write later pieces for specific purposes.

group of doctors doing operation inside room

Gender affirming surgery: a systematic medical deception

Mr Joseph Chrysostom MBBS, MS (General Surgery), Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh is a retired Associate Specialist in A&E, working in a university health board in South Wales.…

https://can-sg.org/2025/07/04/gender-affirming-surgery-a-systematic-medical-deception/

BlueLegume · 12/10/2025 06:13

Thanks @OldCrone perhaps the grammar police would care to comment on the actual presentation made to the parliamentary group.

A medical scandal it most definitely is. Wherever it begins it is a scandal.

OP posts:
Haemagoblin · 12/10/2025 08:23

Soontobe60 · 11/10/2025 06:40

He’s a surgeon, not a linguist or JKR!

So maybe stick to scientific language and leave the polemic to those who have some skill?

BlueLegume · 12/10/2025 08:31

@Haemagoblin do I take it you disagree with all of his comments and observations?

OP posts:
Haemagoblin · 12/10/2025 08:34

People seem to think I'm taking issue with the language because I disagree with the content - not so (apart from the god-bothering in letter 2 but that's contextually appropriate I suppose). Icompletely agree hormonal regimens and irreversible surgeries on young people for gender dysphoria is a terrible idea and the way it has been conducted so far is a scandal.

I just think in a debate like this where hearts and minds are what matters (the science being pretty well beyond dispute) it matters how you get the point across. If he was writing a report of his medical concerns, I'm sure he would have left off the fluffy and written in an informed and intelligent way about this very concerning subject. That's his area of expertise and his skillset.

But this "letter to the young" is worse than useless. The style is confused, there are too many utterly risible elements which young people inclined to be defensive on this subject will fall on immediately, and it mixes the medical facts with layman language in such a way as to fail in both contexts, sounding like nothing so much as a finger-wag that young people simply will switch off from.

If course his purpose may not be to influence the young; but if that is his purpose this letter will not do it.

If this is a linguistics issue (writing in a second language) maybe he would have been as well to write it in his first language and then employ a competent translator to write it into English in such a way as to give the real sense of what was intended. I don't know. I can only work on the basis of what he did in fact write and it's not great FOR THE PROFESSED PURPOSE.

As people on this side of the gender debate always say, words matter. Someone mentioned JKR - one of the reasons she is so valuable to this movement is her eloquence, she has a way of putting things (when she tries rather than just venting he'd frustrations) that is fairly unarguable and faultless. Along with her money, it's why the TRAs hate he so much. It's a superpower.

Not everyone has it, just as not everyone has in depth surgical knowledge. I wouldn't rate JKR trying to write a medical report, and I don't rate this guy trying to write polemic.

Haemagoblin · 12/10/2025 08:36

BlueLegume · 12/10/2025 08:31

@Haemagoblin do I take it you disagree with all of his comments and observations?

Not at all - literally the style is such that it's impossible to take him seriously unless you focus purely on the medical content - in which case why frame it as a "letter to the young"?

Haemagoblin · 12/10/2025 08:38

I work in HE and one of the big issues we have is that not all brilliant researchers are brilliant communicators - it's a very distinct set of skills that doesn't come naturally to everybody.

BlueLegume · 12/10/2025 09:08

@Haemagoblin when this scandal breaks at least he has put a concern down on paper and parliament are aware. If I were him at least I would feel I had tried to expose the deception.

OP posts:
Haemagoblin · 12/10/2025 09:43

BlueLegume · 12/10/2025 09:08

@Haemagoblin when this scandal breaks at least he has put a concern down on paper and parliament are aware. If I were him at least I would feel I had tried to expose the deception.

Well if that's his intention that's all well and good. But it doesn't work for the stated purpose for the reasons I've mentioned.

BlueLegume · 12/10/2025 09:57

https://www.rogdboys.org/effects-of-surgery

The same doctor contributed to this site. He also wrote to the health board in Wales. Same message. That is what matters. Yes, he may well not be reaching the ‘youth’ as you say but then he probably already knows that. What he has done with all the letters is ensure that WHEN the scandal occurs he will have evidence he had pointed it out. Rather like the Post Office scandal and all the postmasters who had to fight for themselves-he is pointing out the ‘bugs, errors and defects’ of gender reassignment procedures. That is good enough for me.

Effects of Surgery | ROGD Boys

Explores research on the effects of sex reassignment surgery on males, including mortality rates, postoperative complications, and psychological outcomes.

https://www.rogdboys.org/effects-of-surgery

OP posts:
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 12/10/2025 10:14

As someone from Wales, I'm glad someone is trying to do something to stop the medical experimenting that's being done on the children of Wales (and else where), because the fing WAG are doing sweet FA about it.

BlueLegume · 12/10/2025 19:48

@TheywontletmehavethenameIwant agree but @Haemagoblin may have comments

OP posts:
LeftieRightsHoarder · 14/10/2025 22:23

Good man. I hope some of those in power read it and think about how they're going to justify themselves when they are called to account.

belleager · 15/10/2025 13:42

GallantKumquat · 11/10/2025 10:18

Well it's not 100% easy to explain. But here are some points:

  • The text is flowery, formal and formulaic without any particular character. It specifically breaks up long sentences of loose clauses with short sentences which provide artificial variation without reinforcing the argument.
  • It lacks personality, anecdote or concrete references to the person of the author, even inadvertent - giving the sense that the author is instead anonymous, except for the bald facts.
  • It uses em dashes which most people find difficult to type.
  • It uses opening and closing quotations which many people find difficult to type.
  • It has the cadence of Reddit prose, a kind of you know it when you see it style, e.g. it lacks specific technical jargon, shorthand, and idiomatic usage.
  • 'Deception' and 'conveyor belt' are awkward. Probably they were present in the bullet pointed skeleton provided to the AI, but in the final text they (to me) don't seem natural.

None of the this proves that AI was involved in the composition. After all AI is trained using actual human prose - a human is capable of writing this way. But having seen a large number of texts on social media where AI has been deployed to help (or perhaps entirely) compose, I would assert that the style is unmistakable in this case. I immediately agreed with Haemagoblin on it being awkward pinpointed it to AI when I read the comment, and like I've mentioned before, I'm favorably disposed to the author and don't find the use of AI automatically invalidating, but I do recognize that it can have an inadvertent negative effect, especially in the context of prose that's meant to be persuasive.

Adding - if someone were to give an informal talk on a subject, say with a power point presentation to a small group of colleagues, and then ask chatGPT to produce a letter for a specific purpose, this is what I would expect.

Edited

You'll often find most of these features where people have studied writing for academic purposes (as native speakers or not) and write on a desktop computer with auto-formatting on a standard word-processing programme. The alternating of longer and shorter sentences is a standard rhetorical approach well known to lecturers and preachers, among others.

Having worked extensively with academics from outside the humanities and social sciences, I have seen this sort of writing frequently, long before the emergence of AI. The first letter quoted is perfectly clear and correct, and no more "pompous" than most formal writing. There's also the shift to a shared lexis when writing to the archbishop, and a less consistent tone, naturally, when quoting extensively from other people's writings.

Your list really doesn't make sense when applied to this selection of texts, especially assuming the writer wasn't typing on a mobile phone.

belleager · 15/10/2025 14:43

belleager · 15/10/2025 13:42

You'll often find most of these features where people have studied writing for academic purposes (as native speakers or not) and write on a desktop computer with auto-formatting on a standard word-processing programme. The alternating of longer and shorter sentences is a standard rhetorical approach well known to lecturers and preachers, among others.

Having worked extensively with academics from outside the humanities and social sciences, I have seen this sort of writing frequently, long before the emergence of AI. The first letter quoted is perfectly clear and correct, and no more "pompous" than most formal writing. There's also the shift to a shared lexis when writing to the archbishop, and a less consistent tone, naturally, when quoting extensively from other people's writings.

Your list really doesn't make sense when applied to this selection of texts, especially assuming the writer wasn't typing on a mobile phone.

Edited

I'd add that the use of "deception" is natural in a letter to an archbishop citing scripture, truth vs deception being a trope in discourse about the gospels. "Conveyor belt" might strike you as not fitting then, because it's certainly not scriptural language, but in sermons, commentaries or statements from the churches, you see that kind of mix all the time - time-honoured phrases interspersed with modern metaphors. Classic Anglican rhetoric. Not seeing ChatGPT here at all.

For myself I use m-dashes and shaped opening and closing quotations in formal writing because I'm used to preparing work for academic publication, not because I've had recourse to AI. It's interesting that these features can be tells, but I wouldn't place too much weight on them.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page