Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Harry Potter and the Ongoing Spat

277 replies

JsmeLegie · 23/06/2025 21:57

I see she is now claiming that she was never actually friends with Fry.

Link here: https://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/jk-rowling-stephen-fry-friends-b1234360.html

In support of Fry, barrister Jo Maugham stated “Really creditable this, from Stephen Fry. I've spoken to so many of JKR's once friends who now despair at her privately but won't do so publicly, which is very much the British way and why nothing ever changes for the better. So well done Stephen.”

Now Casey Bloys, CEO of the network working on a new HP series, has felt the need to clarify on a podcast that the forthcoming series won't be infused with her controversial views, insisting that her views are entirely separate to the show they're making.

And, as one of the latest celebrities to decide to speak out, Boy George weighed in at the beginning of the month with a few observations of his own (see attached image).

So the question here, really, is just how long are certain people going to blindly insist that JKR is an infallible saint when the (increasing) evidence from multiple sources is to the contrary?

Yes, she has funded a lot of good and charitable works for women, that is not in question, but at what point do we as a society finally agree that a human being is not absolved of horrendous behaviour in one part of their life simply because they compensate for it by doing a few good works in another?

Or perhaps you disagree entirely with all her detractors and feel she is unfairly treated / misunderstood / misquoted?
I'd like to hear your views. They are guaranteed to create an interesting dialogue.

Harry Potter and the Ongoing Spat
OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
GailBlancheViola · 23/06/2025 22:46

Yes, she has funded a lot of good and charitable works for women, that is not in question, but at what point do we as a society finally agree that a human being is not absolved of horrendous behaviour in one part of their life simply because they compensate for it by doing a few good works in another?

@JsmeLegie are you referring to JKR in this paragraph? If so please provide examples of her horrendous behaviour.

TheNightingalesStarling · 23/06/2025 22:47

Womens rights, especially those of vulnerable women like abuse victims, aren't for rich, privileged men to give away.

Everythingmustgo · 23/06/2025 22:48

What are you on about OP. JK is a legend and should be held up as a hero for women and girls. She's truly incredible.

As for the odious men you mentioned, their misogynist behavior doesn't surprise me in the least.

NImumconfused · 23/06/2025 22:48

GailBlancheViola · 23/06/2025 22:46

Yes, she has funded a lot of good and charitable works for women, that is not in question, but at what point do we as a society finally agree that a human being is not absolved of horrendous behaviour in one part of their life simply because they compensate for it by doing a few good works in another?

@JsmeLegie are you referring to JKR in this paragraph? If so please provide examples of her horrendous behaviour.

Because that's not a question showing any bias in one direction or the other at all, is it OP? No pre-judging going on there. 🤔

Bannedontherun · 23/06/2025 22:49

Boiledbeetle · 23/06/2025 22:46

I'm your Tunnock's delivery beetle

Oh yes of course do we have enough to go around?

TinselAngel · 23/06/2025 22:50

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 23/06/2025 22:42

the word for today is POMPOSITY

P-O-M-P-O-S-I-T-Y

POMPOSITY

It makes me nostalgic for our old prim transexual ploppers.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 23/06/2025 22:57

What is this "(increasing) evidence from multiple sources"? Because so far you've given nothing more than the personal opinions of some (very unpleasant) people.

TheAutumnCrow · 23/06/2025 22:59

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/06/2025 21:59

Boy George convicted violent offender? That Boy George?

Fry’s done a bit of bird as well but tbf he was quite young.

He ought therefore to be very conscious of just how malleable young minds are, given that’s his excuse for his poor behaviour as a 17 year old, and how vulnerable teenagers are to suggestions from others about actions that are harmful.

EdithStourton · 23/06/2025 23:07

The sight of Boy George struggling to clamber up onto the moral high ground is quite something. He'd better hope he doesn't encounter any radiators along the way...

Come on, OP, you're just wasting our time now.

Notfinanciallyresponsibleforyou · 23/06/2025 23:07

What’s wrong @JsmeLegie

None of us care what these celebs actually say. Boy George and, to a degree Stephen Fry are desperately trying to stay relevant. Sell tickets to latest gig or whatever. Stephen made a bob or two from reading JKR’s book.

Was Stephen really friends with her eg pop out for a coffee or a meal to talk about the kids/holiday/relationships, or was he a work acquaintance? I am guessing the latter.

Boy Geogre, friend or sad former pop star who’s turned crazy on twitter? Again the latter. He has had no involvement in HP

Jolyon. Friend who could chat and exchange quips with JKR or a twitter crazy?
again the latter. He says he has tried with JKR but she says they are not friends, never have been and never will be. He has had no involvement in HP

I have not interest in any media types political or social opinions. Too many people already pander to their egos. And I bet JKR doesn’t have them in any of her WhatsApp groups

BettyBooper · 23/06/2025 23:08

Nasty Radiator Bloke and (so much gross stuff that I can't believe he's not been arrested yet) Fry don't like JKRs views.

Er...

Yeah. In the words of the saintly Dr Dame, 'do better'.

letsallchant · 23/06/2025 23:12

JsmeLegie · 23/06/2025 22:06

And, whilst I hope it's unnecessary to clarify the obvious, this thread is neither pro nor anti JKR and has absolutely nothing to do with her creative works.

This thread is intended solely for open discussion about the ongoing controversies raised against her by others - including, but absolutely not limited to, Stephen Fry - and, perhaps more philosophically, about whether a person's good works in one field entitle them to misbehave with impunity in another.

So this thread is 'neither pro nor anti JKR' but later refers to 'misbehaving with impunity' implying that that's what she's done? Sure. Totally impartial.

Meanwhile, in the opposite corner, we have two convicted criminals (one of a violent crime) and someone who by his own admission beat a wild animal to death. Stunning and brave, all three. I know where I think 'misbehaving with impunity' is taking place.

Viviennemary · 23/06/2025 23:16

I know nearly everyone on MN thinks JK Rowling is wonderful but I don't like her much. Nobody who has worked with her seems to like her either. . Stars of the Harry Potter films, She is always mouthing off her opinions as if hers matter more because she is rich. I disapprove of that attitude.

Lifeispeacefulthere · 23/06/2025 23:16

What MyAmpleSheep said with bells on.

WandaSiri · 23/06/2025 23:18

tobee · 23/06/2025 22:28

This is such a weird premise for a thread. And op's posts are even stranger.

It reminds me of the series of KJK threads, all of which could have been just as accurately titled "I hate KJK."

PractisingMyTelekenipsis · 23/06/2025 23:19

Viviennemary · 23/06/2025 23:16

I know nearly everyone on MN thinks JK Rowling is wonderful but I don't like her much. Nobody who has worked with her seems to like her either. . Stars of the Harry Potter films, She is always mouthing off her opinions as if hers matter more because she is rich. I disapprove of that attitude.

OTOH I know someone who has known her since before she was famous and apparently she's lovely and always has been.

FiveBarGate · 23/06/2025 23:19

Viviennemary · 23/06/2025 23:16

I know nearly everyone on MN thinks JK Rowling is wonderful but I don't like her much. Nobody who has worked with her seems to like her either. . Stars of the Harry Potter films, She is always mouthing off her opinions as if hers matter more because she is rich. I disapprove of that attitude.

Do you need to like her though?

I don't particularly like Stephen Fry but I can recognise that he's very good at reading an audiobook.

I don't agree with David Tennant but he's a good actor.

When did we all need to agree with someone's options to enjoy the work they create?

CrossPurposes · 23/06/2025 23:20

Retiredfromthere · 23/06/2025 22:09

Looked up the Casey Bloys quote. Its reprinted in Variety and its not quite as your abridged version presents it.

"“The decision to be in business with J.K. Rowling is not new for us. We’ve been in business for 25 years,” Bloys said, nodding to the mega-successful “Harry Potter” film franchise that spawned eight movies, grossed $7.7 billion worldwide and launched spinoffs, video games and more.

Bloys was asked if Rowling’s views on the trans community made him worried for the show, to which he continued: “We already have a show on HBO from her called ‘C.B. Strike’ that we do with the BBC. It’s pretty clear that those are her personal, political views. She’s entitled to them. ‘Harry Potter’ is not secretly being infused with anything. And if you want to debate her, you can go on Twitter.”

So he sounds reasonably sensible. Perhaps fed up of being asked and baited on this topic. Which leaves you with Stephen Fry, Boy George and 'Jo' Maugham as examples of people whose opinion we should give weight to? Nah.

Thank you for this. As usual TRAs activists show their ability to précis without misrepresentation any views contrary to theirs is non existent.

Greyskybluesky · 23/06/2025 23:21

Viviennemary · 23/06/2025 23:16

I know nearly everyone on MN thinks JK Rowling is wonderful but I don't like her much. Nobody who has worked with her seems to like her either. . Stars of the Harry Potter films, She is always mouthing off her opinions as if hers matter more because she is rich. I disapprove of that attitude.

Strange, she always speaks so highly of you

lcakethereforeIam · 23/06/2025 23:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

marshmallowpuff · 23/06/2025 23:28

JsmeLegie · 23/06/2025 22:06

And, whilst I hope it's unnecessary to clarify the obvious, this thread is neither pro nor anti JKR and has absolutely nothing to do with her creative works.

This thread is intended solely for open discussion about the ongoing controversies raised against her by others - including, but absolutely not limited to, Stephen Fry - and, perhaps more philosophically, about whether a person's good works in one field entitle them to misbehave with impunity in another.

I agree, OP. Just because Stephen Fry wrote some good comedies in the 1980s, it doesn’t entitle him to behave like a pompous arse, unfairly targeting a woman with inflated allegations about her perfectly normal and legal opinions.

Just because Boy George had two hits four decades ago, doesn’t entitle him to assault and beat someone with a chain.

Is that the kind of “philosophical” point that you mean…?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 23/06/2025 23:28

Jolyon Maugham really is an odious little shit, isn't he?

Literally bemoaning the fact that more of JKR's friends haven't turned on her publicly and implying that many of them have been slagging her off in private.

Aye, right you are, Jolyon. Somehow I don't think you and JKR move in the same circles.

BeanQuisine · 23/06/2025 23:28

It's clear the OP believes that JKR defending women's rights against men determined to cancel those rights = "horrendous behaviour", so it's just another obvious TRA.

TeiTetua · 23/06/2025 23:33

GailBlancheViola · 23/06/2025 22:46

Yes, she has funded a lot of good and charitable works for women, that is not in question, but at what point do we as a society finally agree that a human being is not absolved of horrendous behaviour in one part of their life simply because they compensate for it by doing a few good works in another?

@JsmeLegie are you referring to JKR in this paragraph? If so please provide examples of her horrendous behaviour.

I concur here--horrendous behaviour isn't likely to be subtle or hard to see, so you should be able to point it out easily enough. What exactly are you referring to? Sorry if that's asking you to describe something that's obvious, but we're all a bit dim around here.

CassOle · 23/06/2025 23:34

GailBlancheViola · 23/06/2025 22:46

Yes, she has funded a lot of good and charitable works for women, that is not in question, but at what point do we as a society finally agree that a human being is not absolved of horrendous behaviour in one part of their life simply because they compensate for it by doing a few good works in another?

@JsmeLegie are you referring to JKR in this paragraph? If so please provide examples of her horrendous behaviour.

Well, I did hear that our postman's dentist was told by his uncle's cat, that she was once spotted walking widdershins around a Greggs (I guess the cat wanted a sausage roll). Now if that is not horrendous, what is?