Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Good Law Project's latest claim - fact check?

1000 replies

teawamutu · 17/06/2025 18:14

I'm sure there must be some arrant bollocks in here somewhere, because Jolyon.

But is there anything worrying in this?

goodlawproject.org/ehrc-backs-down-on-single-sex-toilets/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
SinnerBoy · 19/06/2025 19:27

I have a problem with the way the EHRC has interpreted the SC ruling in their draft guidance and I do not believe it will stand. (Although people are so nuts these days, you never know).

I don't know why you have a problem, it's just a summary of the SC ruling. Nothing added, no bells and whistles. It's simplified, but accurate and factual, in order to be a practical guide.

You've essentially conceded that it's going g through, with your fake claim that people are nuts, even though you, against all reason, seem to think it won't be approved.

What's a "non transw," by the way? There's no such thing, as far as I can comprehend. I mean, there are women, who are female humans and transw, who are male humans, who would like to have us believe that they are not males, even though they always have been and continue to be.

SternJoyousBee · 19/06/2025 19:29

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 18/06/2025 15:41

And there we have it.

The real victims of banning male people who wear skirts and makeup from women's toilets will be female people who have short hair and wear no makeup, because it's so easy to get these two groups of people mixed up.

Well that’s me fucked then. How will I survive if someone gulp misgenderz me🥺🥺

The TRAs are really out in force today. Is it the heat?

Merrymouse · 19/06/2025 19:31

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:19

Just because someone is non binary doesn’t mean they are out?

They may not be, but I assume that their goal would be to live openly without having to hide, and they are not helped to do that if services are split into two genders.

borntobequiet · 19/06/2025 19:33

Tandora · 19/06/2025 17:31

Would you feel safe and with your dignity intact as a woman walking into the men’s loo? It is exactly the same for trans women. I cannot understand why this isn’t obvious to you.
Not to mention it would a total violation of privacy.
Again, I cannot understand how you could think this is a reasonable ask?

Edited

It is exactly the same for trans women

Of course it’s not. A transwoman is a male bodied person, a woman isn’t.

But that’s your argument, your only argument - that transwomen are women, which is materially and legally false.
Everything else you say is predicated on this falsity.

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:35

SinnerBoy · 19/06/2025 19:27

I have a problem with the way the EHRC has interpreted the SC ruling in their draft guidance and I do not believe it will stand. (Although people are so nuts these days, you never know).

I don't know why you have a problem, it's just a summary of the SC ruling. Nothing added, no bells and whistles. It's simplified, but accurate and factual, in order to be a practical guide.

You've essentially conceded that it's going g through, with your fake claim that people are nuts, even though you, against all reason, seem to think it won't be approved.

What's a "non transw," by the way? There's no such thing, as far as I can comprehend. I mean, there are women, who are female humans and transw, who are male humans, who would like to have us believe that they are not males, even though they always have been and continue to be.

it's just a summary of the SC ruling. Nothing added, no bells and whistles. It's simplified, but accurate and factual, in order to be a practical guide.

I disagree entirely. I don’t think it will pass in its current form- I think there will be some significant changes. But I also didn’t think Trump would elected , or we would leave the EU, or that PBs would be criminalised, so I acknowledge it’s a possibility.

A non-trans woman is a woman who isn’t trans.
I didn’t use the word cis, because people object, but we do need words to describe things if we are to communicate! Even the people we don’t like..

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:36

borntobequiet · 19/06/2025 19:33

It is exactly the same for trans women

Of course it’s not. A transwoman is a male bodied person, a woman isn’t.

But that’s your argument, your only argument - that transwomen are women, which is materially and legally false.
Everything else you say is predicated on this falsity.

What do you mean by “legally false”?

It is absolutely is the same experience for trans women, although their bodies may have material differences.

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:37

Merrymouse · 19/06/2025 19:31

They may not be, but I assume that their goal would be to live openly without having to hide, and they are not helped to do that if services are split into two genders.

Yes true

DiamondThrone · 19/06/2025 19:43

People moan about how much energy and water AI uses.

They should take a look at @Tandora's posts over the last couple of days.

Totally pointless, but used a huge amount of bandwidth!

NecessaryScene · 19/06/2025 19:43

But they aren’t pretending to be the opposite sex.

So you think transwomen don't claim to be female? And claim they're entitled to be in female-only spaces?

I've got news for you...

I know you say you use a "woman/man" and "male/female" distinction, but trans people don't.

Transwomen don't look at something designated female-only and say "oh, sure, not for me". And only try to get into "women-only" things.

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:50

NecessaryScene · 19/06/2025 19:43

But they aren’t pretending to be the opposite sex.

So you think transwomen don't claim to be female? And claim they're entitled to be in female-only spaces?

I've got news for you...

I know you say you use a "woman/man" and "male/female" distinction, but trans people don't.

Transwomen don't look at something designated female-only and say "oh, sure, not for me". And only try to get into "women-only" things.

Edited

you misunderstand me. I’m saying their claims are not a “pretence”. Their claims are what it is to be trans, and Being trans is not a performance or pretence. and yes they need to be able to use the spaces that are compatible with their safety, privacy and dignity as everyone else.

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:51

DiamondThrone · 19/06/2025 19:43

People moan about how much energy and water AI uses.

They should take a look at @Tandora's posts over the last couple of days.

Totally pointless, but used a huge amount of bandwidth!

Did that make you feel good?

NecessaryScene · 19/06/2025 19:52

they need to be able to use the spaces that are compatible with their privacy and dignity as trans people.

So they're male people who need to be in female-only spaces?

I hate to break it to you, but that's logically impossible.

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:55

NecessaryScene · 19/06/2025 19:52

they need to be able to use the spaces that are compatible with their privacy and dignity as trans people.

So they're male people who need to be in female-only spaces?

I hate to break it to you, but that's logically impossible.

Only because you are stuck in a system of conceptual and linguistic dogma that is rendering you incapable of contemplating the actual realities of human diversity.

teawamutu · 19/06/2025 19:57

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:50

you misunderstand me. I’m saying their claims are not a “pretence”. Their claims are what it is to be trans, and Being trans is not a performance or pretence. and yes they need to be able to use the spaces that are compatible with their safety, privacy and dignity as everyone else.

Edited

Yes, but the claims aren't actually true, are they? In that they're born male or female, and whatever the feeling in their head, if they try to appear as the opposite sex in public they are engaging in a form of (often benign) pretence.

Incidentally of your 2500 posts on MN, over a third are on trans issues, despite the 3 young kids etc. But definitely no personal motivation, yeah?

OP posts:
DiamondThrone · 19/06/2025 19:59

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:55

Only because you are stuck in a system of conceptual and linguistic dogma that is rendering you incapable of contemplating the actual realities of human diversity.

Atually I am going to delete my comment, because this poster is clearly not well.

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:59

teawamutu · 19/06/2025 19:57

Yes, but the claims aren't actually true, are they? In that they're born male or female, and whatever the feeling in their head, if they try to appear as the opposite sex in public they are engaging in a form of (often benign) pretence.

Incidentally of your 2500 posts on MN, over a third are on trans issues, despite the 3 young kids etc. But definitely no personal motivation, yeah?

It’s not true that they were registered female at birth, but they are not claiming that. It is not true that they were born with a body that looks exactly like yours, but they are not claiming that either.

Have you seriously counted how many posts I have ever made on mumsnet 😱 and the topics they were on? How does one do that? I’m flattered I guess…

teawamutu · 19/06/2025 20:00

DiamondThrone · 19/06/2025 19:59

Atually I am going to delete my comment, because this poster is clearly not well.

Edited

Does... Does Judith walk among us?

<swoons>

OP posts:
Coatsoff42 · 19/06/2025 20:00

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:55

Only because you are stuck in a system of conceptual and linguistic dogma that is rendering you incapable of contemplating the actual realities of human diversity.

I feel very youthful, I feel most comfortable around young children, in playgrounds, schools, getting changed with them etc. why I’m not allowed to do that when I feel my dignity is offended around adults, I don’t know. Can you not see how terrible and vulnerable I would be around adults?

People just don’t understand the realities of human diversity 🙄

teawamutu · 19/06/2025 20:02

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:59

It’s not true that they were registered female at birth, but they are not claiming that. It is not true that they were born with a body that looks exactly like yours, but they are not claiming that either.

Have you seriously counted how many posts I have ever made on mumsnet 😱 and the topics they were on? How does one do that? I’m flattered I guess…

Edited

Don't be, I only ever do it when something seems off or dishonest.

Very easy. Advanced search and keyword. Mine will be solidly TERFy for the last few years, to save you the bother, but I'm completely honest about that 😁

OP posts:
Tandora · 19/06/2025 20:03

Coatsoff42 · 19/06/2025 20:00

I feel very youthful, I feel most comfortable around young children, in playgrounds, schools, getting changed with them etc. why I’m not allowed to do that when I feel my dignity is offended around adults, I don’t know. Can you not see how terrible and vulnerable I would be around adults?

People just don’t understand the realities of human diversity 🙄

I get what you are saying but being trans is a real thing. honestly, truthfully it is. It is not superficial. It affects a minority of people, but those people do exist and they are not just pretending.

NecessaryScene · 19/06/2025 20:03

Only because you are stuck in a system of conceptual and linguistic dogma that is rendering you incapable of contemplating the actual realities of human diversity.

Okay, round of applause for that.

I'm afraid mathematicians like Helen Joyce and I are utterly impervious to this sort of thing, but we do appreciate the artistry.

teawamutu · 19/06/2025 20:05

Tandora · 19/06/2025 20:03

I get what you are saying but being trans is a real thing. honestly, truthfully it is. It is not superficial. It affects a minority of people, but those people do exist and they are not just pretending.

But whether they are or they aren't doesn't oblige anyone to play along, or women to budge up and give up single sex spaces in order that male people aren't made sad, however delightful and sincere they are. Right?

OP posts:
Cornishpotato · 19/06/2025 20:05

Tandora · 19/06/2025 19:55

Only because you are stuck in a system of conceptual and linguistic dogma that is rendering you incapable of contemplating the actual realities of human diversity.

That's okay. We fact check. It's true.

No humans are male females nor female males.

Nor are any humans female females or male males, which there would have to be if "cis" was a real human "diversity.

Seriously, this ran it's course of extremely unbelievable contortions and landed back at reality.

Don't worry about it.

Get over it as Stonewall used to say.

Tandora · 19/06/2025 20:05

DiamondThrone · 19/06/2025 19:59

Atually I am going to delete my comment, because this poster is clearly not well.

Edited

Now I’m mentally ill?

Coatsoff42 · 19/06/2025 20:05

Tandora · 19/06/2025 20:03

I get what you are saying but being trans is a real thing. honestly, truthfully it is. It is not superficial. It affects a minority of people, but those people do exist and they are not just pretending.

It is a real thing for them. Lots of people would like the world to be a different place and to suit them just how they like it, but sometimes you put society and others first. Sometimes people put you first over their own preferences too.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.