Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

So, which side is catholic, and which side protestant ?

170 replies

SerendipityJane · 31/05/2025 11:28

Just browsing a couple of podcasts about the reformation, and I was suddenly struck by the parallels in language and commitment to a world view between the early reformation (crispy catholics etc) and the current spat with TRAs and science.

To the extent that either I am alone in my own little universe (which I am quite happy with, thank you) or someone else must have noticed.

Anyway it does provide for a brief distraction if you want to not only examine the parallels, but suggests which side equates to which.

I guess someone, somewhere is working on a PhD around the western christian manifestation of the current transgender discussions. If not they have have that one on me 😎

OP posts:
Grammarnut · 02/06/2025 17:55

SerendipityJane · 02/06/2025 10:52

If I'm getting it right I think the idea is that back then the invention of a new technology (the printing press) led to huge political, social and religious upheaval including the reformation which played out over decades. The parallel with now is that our new technology is the internet, and it is causing a similar time of upheaval which will change our lives and society so much it will be decades before we can look back and understand it.

But would the Reformation have happened without printing ? Not all religious shifts are prompted by technology. The Christianisation of the Roman Empire for example. Or the development of Islam.

The Reformation probably would have happened. For example, the Lollards were preaching in England in the fourteenth century and Wycliffe translated the Vulgate Bible into English before 1400. This had some currency, mainly among the aristocracy - Wycliffe's patron was John of Gaunt, who was also the patron of the poet Gower a popular poet. There was an upsurge of rebellion following the Black Death, which had removed large swathes of the population and caused economic upheaval. I think the printing press speeded matters up a bit - but translation of the scriptures into vernacular languages had been going on for a while (Alfred the Great had the Gospels translated in English so that people could understand them, for example, and he set up schools to teach boys to read and write) and there had been various breakaway movements. The idea that most people were illiterate and that all books were expensive and precious is not entirely true. Scriveners in England, for example, would produce chap books for ordinary people to read - these were mass produced with each scrivener in a workshop making copies of a particular page, then all the pages were bound together - scriveners were taught a neat, clear hand so the pages would not have looked very different because done by different men. Had there not been a literate population to buy the books - mainly in towns - there would have been no mass production (though of course supply and demand do a mutual dance).

Dwimmer · 02/06/2025 18:38

The main reform idea that came from the printing press was through access to bibles in English (or German). So people could read it for themselves.

The Anglican Church (including Church of England) mimics the Catholic structure in many ways and was probably equally corrupt to RCC apart from its earthly head was someone for whom self-interest was a given rather than corruption (The Monarch). But the Church of Scotland is Presbyterian - run by elected members of congregations - so I wonder if that meant it was much less corrupt? Or just corrupted in different ways? It is probably a toss-up whether the Anglican Church or Presbyterian church is most spiritually corrupt these days.

Grammarnut · 02/06/2025 19:43

SionnachRuadh · 31/05/2025 18:33

It's very common - maybe it's inevitable - that a reform movement will generate a lunatic fringe. Usually the fringe stays fringe, but sometimes it becomes significant in its own right.

So the reformers who started out with a position of "we want to address some of the blatant corruption in the church" might have been more cautious if they'd foreseen, say, Calvin's rule in Geneva.

It's very tempting to say we are the radicals and they are the conservatives, but it doesn't always work, and it blinds people to what happens when reformist or revolutionary movements go wrong.

Perhaps I'm a little sensitive about that because I've known too many people who worshipped the memory of the mass murderer Leon Trotsky.

I used to be married to one of those.

SionnachRuadh · 02/06/2025 20:27

Grammarnut · 02/06/2025 19:43

I used to be married to one of those.

We probably know a bunch of the same people then.

Abhannmor · 02/06/2025 21:44

cptnancyblackett · 02/06/2025 10:17

I remember Mary Harrington a few years ago writing about the idea that we were in a 'new reformation'. It was an idea being kicked around in a few corners of the internet which were trying to understand 'woke' ideas as a godless neo-religion and spawned some interesting ideas and articles.

Unherd has an archive of articles tagged 'reformation' which may lead to some interesting/eccentric rabbit holes: unherd.com/tag/reformation/

If I'm getting it right I think the idea is that back then the invention of a new technology (the printing press) led to huge political, social and religious upheaval including the reformation which played out over decades. The parallel with now is that our new technology is the internet, and it is causing a similar time of upheaval which will change our lives and society so much it will be decades before we can look back and understand it.

I find the idea makes more sense if you take a step back from the idea that gender identity ideology is at the centre, and instead see it as one of many manias which are symptoms of what the new technology has enabled.
Relatedly Lionel Shriver talked about this interestingly on Triggernometry recently - she talks about GI as one of many manias that have managed to jump into the mainstream over the last 15 years, she cites transgenderism, BLM, covid, Metoo, climate change/net zero as examples of our "collective capacity to lose our minds'. Here's the interview -

Poor Lionel thinks that Covid was just a fad and climate change a hoax. But then she called the Irish ' a scummy potato residue' who are trying to stop Brexit from being a wonderful success. I'd resent that more , as an Irish person , if she wasn't such a loolah in general.

Dwimmer · 02/06/2025 21:53

Covid clearly wasn’t a fad, but there were certainly beliefs around it and a lot of actions taken that were divorced from the evidence and had much more political motivation behind it than public health concerns.

cptnancyblackett · 02/06/2025 22:17

Yes exactly @Dwimmer . The examples she cites start off from reasonable ideas but developed into 'manias', with the position and demands are at the extreme end, and severe penalties for dissenters.
Mad ideas are very normal and human, so its interesting to think about what has changed with the checks and balances that up until recently seemed to keep most of them in check, and why so many have accelerated into the mainstream rather than remaining on the fringes.
And (just about returning to the thread topic!) what historical parallels may help us understand whats going on?

Needspaceforlego · 03/06/2025 00:14

Dwimmer · 02/06/2025 21:53

Covid clearly wasn’t a fad, but there were certainly beliefs around it and a lot of actions taken that were divorced from the evidence and had much more political motivation behind it than public health concerns.

Absolutely when it came to covid utter madness.

Lunch before 6pm was safe but Dinner wasn't.
The University pool was safe but school pools weren't.
It's safe to be in a restaurant with three dozen random folk but only 6 folk at your table.
Meanwhile it's not safe for 2 folk to meet in one living room .

Even worse people tried to defend the nonsense!!!

Dwimmer · 03/06/2025 00:38

Or making children wear ‘face coverings’ in school despite evidence of increased cross infection, and all the harms to their learning, because it might increase compliance in the community.

Or sitting drinking coffee and chatting for an hour in a cafe but it being vitally important that you wore your face covering for the ten seconds it took to take the six steps to the door.

Or Nicola Sturgeon making party political broadcasts every day in the year running up to the last Scottish Elections without any chance for other parties to reply.

mathanxiety · 03/06/2025 03:09

Dwimmer · 02/06/2025 15:56

To be fair, the pre-reformation Catholic Church was very corrupt, especially under the likes of the Medici family.

Bob Jones wasn't referring to the Medici popes.

LaLaLaLavaChChChChicken · 03/06/2025 03:19

I have not RTFT but, as I don’t fully understand it; I believe, it would be an ecumenical matter.

theilltemperedqueenofspacetime · 03/06/2025 09:20

LaLaLaLavaChChChChicken · 03/06/2025 03:19

I have not RTFT but, as I don’t fully understand it; I believe, it would be an ecumenical matter.

😂😂😂

(RIP laugh reaction 😢)

PS extra kudos for using the endangered semicolon.

SerendipityJane · 03/06/2025 11:45

Dwimmer · 02/06/2025 21:53

Covid clearly wasn’t a fad, but there were certainly beliefs around it and a lot of actions taken that were divorced from the evidence and had much more political motivation behind it than public health concerns.

No different to the black death or any other past plague then.

OP posts:
Dwimmer · 03/06/2025 12:14

SerendipityJane · 03/06/2025 11:45

No different to the black death or any other past plague then.

Very different to the bubonic plague that killed half the population of Europe.

SerendipityJane · 03/06/2025 12:29

Dwimmer · 03/06/2025 12:14

Very different to the bubonic plague that killed half the population of Europe.

What is ?

OP posts:
Dwimmer · 03/06/2025 12:44

SerendipityJane · 03/06/2025 12:29

What is ?

You said Covid was no different to bubonic plague?

cptnancyblackett · 03/06/2025 12:49

Doesn't OP mean no different in the sense that it led to some mad human beliefs and actions?

Abhannmor · 03/06/2025 13:32

cptnancyblackett · 03/06/2025 12:49

Doesn't OP mean no different in the sense that it led to some mad human beliefs and actions?

It did. And some perfectly sensible ones , like quarantine and cremation instead of burial. I think we all suffer from Presentism to some extent. For example the belief that Britain was a dystopian crap hole in the 70s. Although most people could afford to rent or buy a flat. Maybe its the ghastly fashions. Less understandable is ppl who supported the lockdowns now sneering about it . Oh those silly dupes in 2020! Let it rip. I have a friend who is just recovering from Long Covid. Got it pre vaccine in March 20. He thinks it was deliberately unleashed by big pharma to inflict their dangerous vaccine on us all. But then he has spent 4 years watching loopers on YouTube. Sorry Mr Gove I will still defer to experts.

maximalistmaximus · 03/06/2025 13:33

I feel that what we are going through is very similar to the reformation.

SerendipityJane · 03/06/2025 14:36

Dwimmer · 03/06/2025 12:44

You said Covid was no different to bubonic plague?

No I didn't.

I was addressing the point that the public reaction was the same; in that there was a fringe element who believed all kinds of things about the nature of COVID.

That said, there is a case to be made that the black death and COVID did share some points of interest, so comparisons aren't facile.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread