What is a Woman - Wesley Winter

[ArabellaScott]

A very useful compendium of trans activists sharing their views.

I'm not someone who follows fashion. And I've had some dodgy looks in the past. Particularly haircuts and clothes that would get a side eye on the estate where I live. More punk mixed with hippy than anything else though..
As such I'm not one to criticise people's appearances but these protests look like a freak show.
Not a single normal sort of looking person there. Not one. They all pretty much look like they're in the throes of a psychotic crisis to me

When we hear the oft repeated "most vulnerable" it's never broken down is it? What does that mean? Lots of the young gender ideologists are likely very vulnerable. But not in the way that #bekind people and their ilk think.

No, no, you just need to catch Serena on the right day, see! And Rafa on the wrong day, with an achilles injury and a hangover.

Just watched this one too. All power to those counter protectors, so very articulate and sensible. 💪

Every time I hear them say 'they don't want us in public, they don't want us to exist' I want to scream! No one gives a shit as long as you behave decently which means not exposing yourself in public, not threatening people, not entering spaces that aren't for you. Aka womens..
Otherwise exist away!
So sick of these stupid claims.

Oops. This is the one I'm talking about. I'm getting my videos mixed up. I'm going to head over to the other thread now and apologise.
Damn I take a break from FWR for a few days and forget how to behave myself

My comments were about this video. Not the OP's

Not sure why it's still saying it's age restricted . Wesley censored out the topless men and reposted. So it's all pixelated now

Edit- his comment about the fact there's children there. And likely their first time seeing fake breast enhancements. And they're on men! Way to confuse kids eh

Doh I meant protestors not protectors ...

@Iamnotalemming ha! I'm struggling today so I think your little typo is nothing compared to my nonsense posts

I only watched the first few minutes. They sound pretty confused about their own arguments, don't they? I know it works well to just let them talk without contradiction, but it's also infuriating. I just wanted to shout 'A woman is someone who embodies femininity?! Seriously?! So if a biological woman doesn't wear feminine clothes and act girly, she's not a woman?' Fgs.

And, I loved the young GC women on the second video. But it was such a shame to hear one of them say that unlike the others, she had nothing to lose now as she's already been kicked out of a role and branded a terf.
Could she possibly be supported to bring a case against Leeds Uni, if she hasn't already done so? She seems on the ball though so I assume she will have put something in motion

Vulnerable frightened women, don't stomp into London and get their tits out.
That's how you know they are simply narcissistic perverted men.
And to the 'queer' crusty dude who said they are just exposing themselves , making themselves vulnerable to show how vulnerable they are ...see my first comment above

And crucially, vulnerable does not necessarily mean harmless. Sarah Baker is vulnerable. He's also highly unstable with a violent history and repeatedly threatens women.

100% this!
I thought the logic had completely left the scene when Baker came out with that?! A straight admission that they know they are male and knew they wouldn’t be arrested.

I still also don’t get the logic of demonstrating how vulnerable you are by getting your moobs out at Downing Street? To me that action is the polar opposite of vulnerability surely?

I wonder if Starmer has seen this video or heard about it. When Barker was waffling on, it sounded like he was saying he knows Starmer on a personal level. And that he has TIM related sexual skeletons in his closet. Quite a damaging claim really.