This is so full of 'we're the nice, kind, caring people' and 'those who disagree with us are hateful and nasty'.
It's tremendous gaslighting, when you consider that they are the ones demanding the right for children to have their hormones messed up and their puberty destroyed, often left infertile and with wholly avoidable serious health issues as a direct result.
If you block a child's natural puberty for their sex, it doesn't magically switch it to the puberty of the opposite sex; just like if you chop off a healthy arm, it doesn't grow back as a leg - it's just gone completely.
They claim that most children know what 'gender' they are from the age of 4. More blatant lies: plenty of 4yos want to be cats, dinosaurs, unicorns, Thomas the Tank Engine or whatever; and a lot of them genuinely believe that, if they want it enough, it becomes the truth.
It's downright abusive to seek to put so much responsibility on to such a young child, and to give them so much agency. The big difference with 'non-trans' children is that, whatever they know or think they are, it doesn't change or destroy material fact from happening naturally until they are old enough to appreciate it.
They also push the fallacy that biological men can have HRT, which is demonstrably false. The 'R' stands for 'replacement' - you obviously cannot replace something that was never meant to be there in the first place. It's the equivalent of (actual) women going to their GPs and being given 'replacement testicle surgery' when it's discovered that theirs are somehow missing!!!
Their booklet contained the page where they describe their trans utopia and later discover 'sadly it was all a dream' (what an original literary device); but to me, I thought the rest of the booklet read like a big fairy tale dream, where if you wish hard enough, it will come true. Et in trans Arcadia ego.
It all just comes from an automatic assumption that they are the central characters in this, and that they are entitled to whatever they want and demand as a given. Anybody who doesn't bow down and give them everything they feel entitled to is a 'hater' - and thus gets added to their list to bump up the massive perceived 'hate crimes' index that they are supposedly intolerably suffering from.
It's like saying that Tesco are guilty of a hate crime by refusing to let you take away food that you don't have the money to buy - however hungry you are or however much you want it.