Andrew Tate and brother leave Romania for US after travel ban lifted

[GreenTeaLikesMe]

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2025/feb/27/andrew-tate-tristan-romania-us?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other. It seems that Trump successfully pressured the Romanian authorities into allowing this.

My beloved home state of Florida is building a case to bring charges against one or more of the Tate brothers: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy9dx5d1g5lo

Remember that Florida was the only jurisdiction that convicted Jeffrey Epstein. He served time (obviously not enough) in the Palm Beach county jail.

You might be OK with violent rapists in your workplace, I'm not so keen.

@Qope, why do you think the women working in the Whitehouse aren't at risk from Trump and his guest rapists?

Sounds like you're suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome yourself.

Unlike vulnerable women in prison under the democrats - if Tate were convicted he would just need to say ‘I identify as a woman’ and he would be offered more victims who would be locked in a cell with him.

What are you wanging on about @AshKeys? The Democrats are not in power. Rapists are being removed from women's prisons in the US. Doesn't mean they should be invited to the Whitehouse, does it?

So you support some of Trumps initiatives? They are being removed from Federal prisons, not state prisons in Democrat states. Of course rapists shouldn’t be invited to the Whitehouse.

Women are women. Men are not women. This is a viewpoint shared by 99% of the world's population. Because I agree with Trump on this simple fact doesn't mean I think he's good for women. He isn't. The Taliban know that men are not women. It doesn't mean the Taliban are good for women.

The Rapist in Chief won't be getting any cookies from me.

So what was the point of your original whataboutery (Democrats. Female prisoners) @AshKeys?

I am not sure what your point is? This is a typical thread of ‘look the person you agree with on some things has done something bad so you must be aligned with that too!’

Rapists are bad, Tate is bad. Trump is bad for welcoming Tate to the White House. Democrats are bad for locking women in cells with rapists.

Now what?

Is Trump bad @AshKeys ? He is a serial sex offender and rapist after all?

What do you think? We’ve just established you agree with him on somethings things so….?

I don't know what your views on Trump are @AshKeys. That's why I asked: do you think Donald Trump is bad? What with him being a rapist and serial sex offender and all?

I'm not sure that we can legally call him that, he was convicted for sexual assault, not rape. It could put MN in a tricky spot.

That's not to say that I believe he's not...

Then report my post. Or ask about it on Site Stuff.

This is FWR where we call a woman a woman, a man a man, and a rapist a rapist. I will not self-censor regarding Trump's sex offending against women.

I see the Tate brothers are back in Romania, at least for the moment.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62xky7rn75o

Well thats a suprise.

I am assuming the UK police will be looking at an international arrest warrent too.

various quotes from this thread:

https://x.com/crayonmurders/status/1908236186755244513?s=46&t=A2fpFNgDRyXF2d6ye97wEA

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: The Tate brothers are now under Federal investigation in the USA.

The investigation is being handled by the DOJ’s Southern District of New York.

For context, the Southern District of New York is the same office that took down Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

Other notable cases include Michael Cohen, El Chapo, Bernie Madoff, and John Gotti, to name a few.

UPDATE: Based on the documents and the US law it references, it appears that at least one offense is human trafficking.

Jane Doe is a victim of human trafficking, and that’s the basis for the US code referenced.

The message in the States right now appears to be that if the Executive won’t do its job the judicial will try. America is fighting with itself.

TooBigForMyBoots · 18/03/2025 22:54

This is FWR where we call a woman a woman, a man a man, and a rapist a rapist. I will not self-censor regarding Trump's sex offending against women.

I think you've misunderstood my point, I'm not wanting to report it. It's a fact that we can say that he's a proven danger to women and that he's been found liable in a case of sexual assault.

He hasn't been convicted of rape, however and it could cross a legal threshold, by calling him a rapist.

As I said, I don't disagree, it's just that, this far, those allegations remain unproven.