“It's always seemed quite obvious that it was about transmen struggling with dysphoria exacerbated by the word breast than about transwomen. Whenever this is pointed out the threads here fly into a rage and become overwhelmed with lurid posts about men secreting chemically-induced toxic pus from their male nipples and becoming sexually aroused from feeding babies. It's really Mumsnet transphobia at its worst.”
What was obvious that it was about female people. when the letter posted included mention of a study about male producing a substance from their nipple?
Seems to me that you are the one who is mistaken. For your point to be consistent with the accurate interpretation of the letter no such study would have been listed and the word female would have been used. After all, we are constantly told people with transgender identities do not deny their sex and can acknowledge such facts.
And the very existence of those lurid posts, which I note you don’t deny relate to very real studies and very real self published anecdotes of male people doing just what was posted, presents enough doubt to show your statement ‘it was obvious’ as being rather doubtful.
Here it has already been kindly posted but just in case you missed it, here it is again.
https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Exchange-Biology-Matters-COTS-Letter.pdf
Or maybe you never read the letter the article referred to and thought to post to shame those who do have the background information and simply disagree with you anyway.
I mean, you declared it was ‘obvious’ when it would only be obvious to someone determined to ignore the evidence in the letter itself.