Perhaps those reading along are beginning to understand another dynamic at play here too. Because language that is deemed ‘offensive’ around these discussion is now a very complex issue.
If organisations and spokespeople are being lauded for using language that is truly offensive when you consider it, such as “bleeders” and “black birthing bodies” and “cervix havers” and calling vagina’s “front holes” or “bonus holes”, do readers begin to understand that to shock people out of thinking this should be accepted, that one way is to use language that is just as offensive. Because if people accept the use of ‘black birthing bodies’ and celebrate the organisations using this, is anyone going to stop and think about a sentence that reads ‘people who are transgender should access double mastectomies so their bodies fit how they feel they should look’?
I mean, really? After you have just desensitised yourself to accept dehumanising language as normal and in fact, desirable so that some people don’t feel ‘unsafe’, did you even blink and consider the ramifications of :
‘people who are transgender should access double mastectomies so their bodies fit how they feel they should look’?
But reading the shocking and offensive ‘getting their tits chopped off’ did evoke a reaction. It did cause a ‘hang on a minute’ moment.
And the next question should be ‘why the fuck are feminists using this offensive language? What the actual fuck?!!!!’
Maybe, just maybe the message is seeping through that desensitisation coming from the normalisation of this sanitised language that hides the reality of what is happening. And the new normal of willingly accepting that we lie with our language with pronouns etc
The blunt language forces a discomfort response that hopefully leads to seeking more information. It won’t in some people because the programming is too strong for many reasons, including heavy personal investment/cost.
I think the logical question to people who disagree with the language is to ask ‘how do you convey the brutality of these operations in as fewer words as possible to disrupt people’s comfortable bubble and cause further questioning’ ?