SNP MP, 'feared for his safety' after transwoman threats

[ArabellaScott]

... yet Chris Law voted for self ID, and called it a 'catastrophe' when the GRR Bill was blocked.

Chris would have 'Alannah' use women's spaces, despite 'Alannah' causing him 'fear and alarm'.

Article:

https://archive.is/UaIgO#selection-2395.74-2395.81

Some of Law's tweets on GRR:

https://x.com/chrislawsnp/status/1614377939977605120

https://x.com/ChrisLawSNP/status/1578300602852855808

As Mother in AbFab said

“Just the one, dear?”

What's the point? Please explain.

Indeed Chris. What’s the point?

I can't be bothered to explain it to you Christinapple, have a really good think yourself, re-read the opening post and see if you can join the dots.

.

Right,because no one else has ever been attacked by a man wearing a frock have they?

And those who protest against drag queens or transgender people can't possibly be bad people, right?

www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/neo-nazi-said-he-was-protecting-kids-by-protesting-drag-he-just-got-busted-with-child-porn/ar-BB1npfUZ

Happy to condemn anyone for having images of CSA, no one should justify terrible behaviour, whatever form of abuse that is.

Yes, it's rather telling that one side always defends "their" lot to the hilt, no matter what, but the other is happy to criticise bad actors on theirs. I wonder why that is?

Well,the fact that he's a 'neo Nazi' should give you a clue that he's not a good person.

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/12/nazi-group-sued-by-state-for-disrupting-lgbtq-events-drag-story-hours-with-threatening-protests/

And this.

Weren't there also Nazis at Kellie Jay Keen's anti-trans rallies too?

This is entirely irrelevant to the thread. Just spurious defamatory accusations to try desperately to distract.

Christ on ice,give me strength.

Just like the implication made by this thread?

The links I posted are perfectly valid to the thread.

If you don't want people pointing out some people who protest against trans people and/or drag performers do bad things, then you shouldn't be cherry picking articles where trans people have done bad things to try to make them all look bad.

Eh? The thread is about the MP, Chris Law, being attacked by a transwoman.

What 'implication' is there?

The point of the thread is that Mr Law has campaigned for self ID, and therefore campaigned against single sex spaces, and supported the lie that 'transwomen are not a threat'.

Yet he has declared himself afraid of a transwoman. Why is it Law is allowed to be afraid of transwomen, but women who don't want to share spaces with them are dismissed?

Absolutely hee haw to do with drag queens or nazis.

You could always start another thread if you want to talk about Nazis.

Try to imagine how this post would look if "trans woman" was replaced by almost any other group of people.

(btw note there is a space between trans and woman.)

You can replace 'transwoman' with 'man' if you prefer.

There would only be a space if we were talking about a type of woman. Tall woman, thin woman, quiet woman, happy woman. As transwomen are men, if a space must be added then it would be before the man which gives us transwo man. What do you prefer, transwoman or transwo man?

I've met Chris Law a few years ago and had had a decent conversation about forestry restoration projects and climate resilience (not gender self ID). He's a massive bloke. He was at the time the tallest MP in the House, and given that there's 650 of them, that gives you some idea of how unusually tall he is. Not the sort of individual any sane person would pick a fight with. So if he's frightened, that doesn't bode well for the rest of us!

Well said.

Do you support proper data collection of offending by biological sex so we can see if it's 'just one' or if it's male pattern offending?

Do you expect people to change their views on an entire group of people based on the experience with 1 individual?

But it's not 1 individual. It's male individuals, of which there are billions.