I'm going to make a bit of a guess, and say, I don't think most people today, unless they have been following all this stuff very carefully like this board does, or are naturally very contrarian, are able to make the kind of leap to see this as evidence of a safeguarding issue.
Nor do I think they are capable of wondering if these guys were pushing an agenda.
It has been drilled into people, especially anyone under about 40, that there is no connection between sexual fetish, or what they consider different or queer sexualities, and stuff like paedophilia, that they will always read anything like this as a one-off. Something that could happen anywhere and does.
I've talked to young people who refuse to understand that as a group, statistically, gay men are more promiscuous than heterosexual people. They consider that to be a deeply bigoted lie, and it can't be true.
They are not going to wonder if these guys were trying to push certain policies in the organization that could be dangerous, for the same reasons. They have cut off the possibility of making a connection like that.