Cult-captured BBC have still avoided mentioning WARPATH, but could not ignore the JKR event. Before I switched off the radio, I heard the Cult spokesman explaining that the evil one had tweeted horrible things which would incite everyone to be hateful to the 'specials'. JKR had even named some among them, and had said incredibly horrid nastiness about them.
The impression created was that JKR had somehow become an internet troll, writing abuse and fabricating stories, then attaching her falsehoods to real people she had chosen to target. The man was becoming quite convincing, in his outrage and alarm about JKR's monstrous behaviour.
The interviewer did not challenge by pointing out the things JKR tweeted were factual. Instead, this story was broadcast to the nation/world, in the name of the once trusted BBC.
Had the interviewer and the man both somehow contrived NOT to read those fairly short tweets, which simply listed details about the men's crimes, as proved in court? The general public, (not taking much notice,) could have been convinced JKR had really done something wrong.
Meanwhile, the Guardian readers and Party leaders, making determined efforts not to see, hear or think, would not find their fingers-in- ears "la la la" had been dented by hearing any inconvenient truth.
(It's ironic that r pist 'Isla Bryson's' pink tights were the breakthrough, because normal people could not ignore that picture, and even politicians must be needing to work hard at their "la la"-ing)