Updated boycott list: Pets at Home

[HelenaTranscart]

Another retailer for the boycott list: Pets at Home. Totally captured! I feel so sorry for their staff.
See https://www.jamesesses.com/p/barking-mad-the-ideological-capture

Anyone going to take one for the team and break the news in The Doghouse? 😱

Name Change in order if you do! 🙉🙈🙊

Barking mad

Sorry SidewaysOtter, I can’t find the thread, but I’m pretty sure there was a discussion on here recently suggesting that the veterinary profession has become very TWAW. I’m sure someone posted in agreement saying that they can’t believe what ridiculousness they have to listen to in the staff room, from supposedly intelligent people who work in a science based career.

Except it’s not L and it never is. Pronouns and gender identities have fuck all to do with L. Stuff like this is only ever about TQ+.

I'm not keen on boycotting places, simply because we'd run out of places to shop, there's that many captured. Its depressing.

I switched to zooplus for my regular order this month, even though I was perfectly happy with Pets At Home. The order arrived today and has been equally as good. And it came with a little booklet with vouchers.

Pets at Home - absolute bellends

They really are a disgrace.

Imagine saying that to a staff member who longs for a child and may have miscarriages.

Unthinkable. Or a person whose child has died from cancer / car crash any thing else they don’t give a fck about.
Demonstrates the whole selfishness / wrongness / entitled hypocrisy of this utterly misguided movement.

We all know it’s not about the LGB.

UGG is now at it. Seriously, do these companies not care about their customers?!

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1800290073361219683?s=61

Wait what did Pets@Home do? The link doesn't work for me, it says you need a paid subscription to read. Can someone give a brief explanation please?

Alok is a radical trans activist who said “little girls are k*nky”

Just who the hell thought this was a good idea.

Of course they don't care about their customers. They're captured, they care only about appealing to men who are trying to destroy women's rights and identities and endanger children. It's what marketing is all about these days. Hate crossing Uggs off the list now, they were my treats for very special occasions but they won't be getting a single penny more from me.

Uggs are overpriced nonsense! Go to a Spanish market in your holidays and stock up on lovely sheepskin foot ware for bugger all.

What a horror story he is, and UGGS must be out of their mind.

Apologies if Mint Velvet are already on the boycott list but I've just seen this. He's not even bothered to hide his pronouns!

Not just pronouns he is not hiding

FFS.

Are they kidding us? Why would I buy a skirt that fits a male body?

I actually really like that skirt. But if it fits him there's absolutely no chance it would get past my hips.

It just makes me think that designers are being more open about the fact that women's fashion was always designed with a particular body physique and often with the male gaze in mind.

Ive never thought of Mint Velvet as particularly cutting edge.

Sat through a demonstration of how to clean our new rabbit’s penis at PaH. It was only afterwards we pointed out our rabbit was female