UK: Former Leader in “Gender Diversity” Organization Pleads Guilty to Live-Streaming Castrations, Distributing Images of Child Child Abse

[NeighbourhoodWatchPotholeDivision]

from Reduxx

A former queer activist from Norway has pleaded guilty in a London court after carrying out castrations and livestreaming the footage as pornography to a paying audience over a span of six years. Marius Gustavson, 46, uploaded recordings of the illicit surgeries to his ‘Eunuch Maker’ website, netting up to £200,000 from subscribers.

Read more at Reduxx

The trouble is that this is so extreme that no-one would believe us if we talk about it. Imagine trying to explain this to friends at work.

This case proves that some surgeons, nurses and trans rights campaigners are motivated by a fetish where they are aroused by children and adults mutilating their genitals.

These men are actively influencing policy. Respected organisations like the WHO, WPATH and even the NHS (who had to remove a link the the WPATH guidance on 'Eunuch gender') have been acting on the advice of these extremists.

Yet women who are talking about safeguarding barely have a voice.

So true.

Artist Mao Sugiyama shocked Twitter ten years ago posting the words 'Please retweet. I am offering my male genitals (full penis, testes, scrotum) as a meal for 100,000 yen… I will prepare and cook as the buyer requests, at his chosen location.'
The price was slashed when it was decided to share the groin-grown grub between a number of people.
Tokyo illustrator Sugiyama honoured the deal and had the genitals cooked up for five people at £160 a head.

WTAF have I just read on
the DM link?

Aye. Wtaf indeed

But Origen was widely condemned at the time and in subsequent ages for misinterpreting that passage. Virginity and celibacy were highly valued by the Church, mutilation was seen as ( I think I remember correctly) rejecting the perfect image of humanity , as being in the image of the Creator. There was also probably the problem of the self castrating cults of Cybele and some other ‘ Oriental’ deities.

The current clergy with their fervent embrace of bodily transformation, either surgically or medically, might do well to remember this.

This is the 'queer' movement Yep.

I keep wondering when the penny is going to drop for most parents that this is the case, it's so obvious with more and more men like this - men who've driven this agenda - revealing themselves to be this way.

And queer theory 'being your authentic self' and 'love is love' bollocks is being taught in many schools. Not all have totally lost the safeguarding plot of course, but many have. Sooner or later there will be a reckoning and it's going to be awful.

The tables are not turning it's the cognitive dissonance of public bodies and the media over this issue.

A few years ago the police stopped a religious castration cult in London, yet at the same time promoted transgender Pride etc.

Everyone is outraged over this, yet if it was dressed up as "gender identity" (with WPATH have tried) then it becomes perfectly acceptable.

I think it really comes down to what is considered "harmful" to men. Castration is rightly seen as harmful, but that fear disappears if people buy into this theory that there are women born in the wrong body.

If this guy dressed it up as "affirmation" would people then be outraged? Or are people not willing to buy his excuses, yet at the same time accept all of transgender theory?

£160 a head is a good joke though.

Depressing, isn't it?

Another incidence of NHS affirming eunuchs as a gender identity:

https://www.institutemh.org.uk/news/1629-professor-jon-arcelus-contributes-to-new-global-guidelines-for-the-care-of-transgender-and-gender-diverse-people

What is so amusing about that is they want everything for free. They think they deserve to have it all given to them on a freaking silver platter. They don't want to play for anything, ever. Just the taxpayers to fund their lifestyle.

An article about this bunch in the Guardian, it's endless. Be warned bits are quite graphic

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/12/man-disability-benefits-leg-amputated-court-marius-gustavson-eunuch-maker

This, I wonder if this manuel had a 'legitimate' use? 🙄😬

The court heard that Arnold gave Gustavson medical advice for procedures and shared a manual with him called “Penile Disassembly Manual: anatomical surgical steps”, which he said was “porn to me”.

What happened to these men? How the fuck do they become so....maimed that this is what they aspire to see, to do?

What. The guardian printed that sentence and they can't see the irony in it? Jfc

Arnold is the one who was a nurse at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. I wonder what motivated this man, who has admitted possessing extreme pornography, to join the nursing profession.

Not usually a fan of “trigger warnings” but if an article ever needed one, it’s this one.

”Bodily modification” = biggest euphemism ever for self harm on a nightmarish scale. I wonder if the Graun will ever join the dots and link this kind of violent self harm with the mastectomies willingly undergone by young women with healthy breasts in the name of “transitioning”? (Rhetorical question 🤦‍♀️)

This is terrifying

I'd also like the Guardian to interrogate how many men there might be, who would view a Breast Tissue Removal Manual: anatomical surgical steps as porn.

The castration fetishists who contributed to the Eunuch chapter of WPATH’s SoC8 fantasise about boys who have been castrated.

If boys with a gender identity arrest puberty at a prepubertal stage, and go on oestrogen and progress to surgery, they end up being adults with the bodies of boys, who have been castrated.

Most people can join the dots. Not the Guardian, though.

”Eunuch maker” - another nightmarish euphemism.

Don't be silly, I'm sure a fetishist's interest in castrating boys is totally irrelevant to their public campaigning for the legalisation and normalisation of castration procedures on boys.

No dots to be joined at all. They genuinely and sincerely believe some boys will have a better life if castrated!

Eunuch gender is considered a perfectly plausible and valid gender according to WPATH.

I don't need to do all the links to the NHS doctors/staff who are high up in WPATH again, do I? We all are aware already yes?