Sorry, I can't do a sharetoken at the moment, but this is a comment by Kenny Farquharson in the Times. I don' think he understands the issue.
And surely that claim below is wrong, or is that a different judgment where some judge claimed that sex didn't necessarily mean biological sex?
"Dorrian upheld an earlier judgment that trans women should be treated the same way as biological women under legislation to improve gender balance on the boards of public agencies. She rejected the argument that this was incompatible with the Equality Act in which, she accepted, “sex” meant biological sex."
How the trans row will end in compromise (thetimes.co.uk)