This is something that worries me, as it appears that there may be an institutional medical bias and discrimination against cisgender men and women.
At one point with hormone use for trans people, we were talking about a serious mental health issue and gender dysphoria. So that distress then justified major interventions like surgery and cross sex hormones.
But now, they seem to have lowered the bar, and e.g. non binary people that aren't even supposed to be suffering from mental illness (debatable going off some TikToks), are being, "helped in affirming their gender".
https://www.gendergp.com/non-binary-hormone-use/
OK, so if you have lowered the bar that much, why aren't they also helping cisgender men and women to "affirm their gender"?
Cisgender males could want testosterone for building muscle. That's tied up with their gender identity and gender expression for sure.
That's also true for some cisgender women. It would be a stereotype to think that muscle and strength are only for cisgender men.
Neither can we think that a woman who does that would have to be, "non binary". Of course it can also be part of the gender expression for cisgender women who don't have to conform to traditional gender roles or expectations.
However, I think the best case here, on health grounds, is adult cisgender males.
If your lifestyle involves healthy eating, cardio, weight training, and you were to take limited amounts of testosterone to help you with that, then the risks may not be too high.
(We aren't talking about the black market very high dosage drug cocktails, multiple drugs, taken by some pro bodybuilders here, which is unquestionably dangerous.)
So what I'm thinking, is that it's likely going to be safer to give testosterone to cisgender adult males, than to give it to "non binary" biological females.
So if it's safer, why wouldn't they want to help the cisgender males with their gender expression, if they are willing to help non binary people with gender expression?