Gender GP, Susie Green and their Residential for ‘Trans Kids’

[CopperRosie]

An “amazing weekend held by @think2speak for families and young people”

https://twitter.com/green_susie100/status/1648774304954195974

I'm pleasantly surprised that I've not earned a deletion by my comparison to Waco, @TheBiologyStupid !

Gosh. That's a bold new direction for GenderGP.

I agree it's hugely worrying.

Children with gender issues are often very vulnerable, indeed. They need high quality support and care.

Evidence-based care, from stable, reliable, sensible adults.

Will Cass / the government's implementation of the recommendations shut down this sort of nonsense by private organisations?

I hope an undercover reporter is working on their backstory as we speak. Infiltrating these weekends is all it will take.

I concede It'll be a challenge to write up a weekend of kids expressing themselves through joy, worry, happiness, desperation, specialness, uplifting, teary, soul enriching genocide.

Interpretative dance is the first medium that springs to mind.

Imagine getting a group of very vulnerable kids together and telling them that the Government and most of the public want to 'eradicate' them.

Then tell them and their families that unless they buy expensive, experimental, life-limiting drugs they will probably be suicidal.

How on earth is this legal?

Really interesting idea that, the disproportionate number of people with autism who are attracted to the trans ideology, and the rigidity of thinking/inability to deal with any change, challenge or questioning that we see so often in the ranks of TRAs.
Similarly, someone recently mentioned that narcissistic personality traits tend to map quite well onto the kind of activism we see from TRAs, and that "cult of the self" we see exhibited so often. I know I've had discussions on Twitter with TRAs and trans people whose arguments are almost exclusively about themselves, their own experiences and motivations.

This. Social Services should be onto this.
But they are captured, so they are looking the other way. They won't question the Special Glittery People.

Even questioning the Special Glittery People is seen as fascism, bigotry, evil.

I've been called a Nazi for suggesting kids don't need to be cut up (as have many others). How did we get here?

38 likes. Wow.

Also I wonder if people should report some of those tweets for telling lies to children.

😨

Working with the visionary@HelenWebberley for trans people, fighting for access to timely effective care that refuses to pathologise. (5/14)

'Refuses to pathologise'? So they're not ill then.

An entire generation of young people who have no foreseeable access to desperately needed and life saving healthcare. I am determined to work hard with others to question and challenge this, and provide a viable alternative until the system catches up. But really, WTF? (11/14)

Healthcare is 'desperately needed and life saving' for these children who are not ill.

Susie, if they're not ill then the healthcare can't be 'desperately needed and life saving'. WTF indeed.

It switches from an innate essence, which must be allowed to flower and thrive to something which needs lifelong medication to sustain, so fast, whiplash is guaranteed.

Imagine going back 20 years and stopping the ridiculous GRA in its tracks. We had no idea.

At least it wasn't an exchange trip to Thailand...

😶

It's amazing how fast they go from "stolen land acknowledgement now" to "ackshually, Native people who don't agree that there's a trans genocide are traitorous boot-kissing rats"

I’ve been saying this for years. Schroedinger’s transgenderism. Simultaneously not an illness and in desperate need of “life-saving” healthcare.

It makes me absolutely sick to my stomach that Green, Webberley and all the other zealots and grifters are able to do this, especially to kids..

Indoctrinating vulnerable kids to believe that people, and their government, hate them and want them dead? Fucking hell. I just can't comprehend how they could possibly think that could help those kids.

Unless helping them is less important than boosting their ranks with loyal and desperate followers...? Much like some kind of religious group, often living together, whose beliefs are considered strange by many people

So people with cluster B personality disorders manipulating an army of people with ASD traits and others who lack critical thinking skills or just tend to be easily manipulated…

I really think that the sooner we recognise gender identity as a religious belief and give it the same rights and protections that we give other religious beliefs, no more, no less, the better.

Most of the problems we are facing with it come down to the fact that it is a faith position but it is being pushed by institutions which should know better as irrefutable, settled fact as if we have made a major scientific discovery about the nature of humanity and the world more generally about which there can be no doubt.

Many of us don’t believe that trans identities (having a soul of one sex in the body of the other sex) are real in the same way that atheists don’t believe that deities are real. We don’t want to hurt or disadvantage anyone who believes in gender identity, we just don’t want to be forced to share that belief or have that belief impact on us unnecessarily. Currently we are in the process of restructuring society to favour this one religious belief over all others and over not believing at all, including its core tenet of what we would normally call out as child mutilation. We recognise breast ironing and FGM for what they are. This new religious belief obscures almost identical practices.

To conclude my thoughts, when we are able to treat gender identity as the religious belief it is, I think that it will naturally lose some of its attraction for the people with cluster B personality traits as they will gain less power from it. We will also be able to apply reasonable restraints on its practice where those practices conflicts with the rights of others or what we as a society deem morally acceptable. For example castration and double mastectomy of children we would likely agree is not morally defensible.

At the moment we basically have this new quasi religious belief system, which society elevates to the highest level (without fully understanding those beliefs or their consequences for the rest of us) so that its practitioners cannot be questioned and mustn’t be offended.

That is really, really dangerous in my opinion.

For example castration and double mastectomy of children we would likely agree is not morally defensible.

Indeed - and yet umpteen men are currently on trial for castrating each other, because you can't consent to such harm. You really couldn't make it up.

I'm glad it's getting some exposure, as it were, in the press.

But I bet there's still something of a perception filter going on.

People need to realise that mean subscribe channels where they watch castrations being done, and get sexual gratification from it, as does the person who is having it done to them.

Excellent posts, Pomegranate - thanks!

I wasn't familiar with Cluster B, so here's a link in case I'm not alone:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_disorder#Cluster_B_(dramatic,_emotional_or_erratic_disorders)